Trade for Sam Bradford?

[Drunken Pygmy Goat]

30 minutes ago, Jauronimo said:

It was the greatest mentorship the NFL has known since Kevin Kolb taught a young EJ Manuel about water safety.

 

IDK...AJMac did mentor a "project" into a "superman" 

1 minute ago, LOVEMESOMEBILLS said:

No thank you

 

Fixed it for ya? And everyone else

[Lfod]

I think the idea of a better back up isn't a bad one. I just think it will be a no name emergency type thing. 

[LOVEMESOMEBILLS]

1 minute ago, Drunken Pygmy Goat said:

 

IDK...AJMac did mentor a "project" into a "superman" 

 

Fixed it for ya? And everyone else

Nope. That doesn't come close to properly reflecting how I feel. Why would anyone want Sam I suck so bad Bradford to come here? Didn't want him in the offseason and certainly don't want him now. It's like watching paint dry while someone repeatedly rakes their fingers down a chalkboard and screams J-E-T-S  JETS, JETS, JETS at you over and over again with a megaphone from two feet away. Ef that.

[GreggTX]

Not even remotely interested in paying his salary or giving away draft picks. NO!!!

[Drunken Pygmy Goat]

8 minutes ago, LOVEMESOMEBILLS said:

Nope. That doesn't come close to properly reflecting how I feel. 

 

Clearly...

 

8 minutes ago, LOVEMESOMEBILLS said:

It's like watching paint dry while someone repeatedly rakes their fingers down a chalkboard and screams J-E-T-S  JETS, JETS, JETS at you over and over again with a megaphone from two feet away. Ef that.

 

If there's a hell on earth, this may be it.

 

10 minutes ago, Lfod said:

I think the idea of a better back up isn't a bad one. I just think it will be a no name emergency type thing. 

 

Peterman/Fales just has a fitting sound to it.

Edited September 26, 2018 by Drunken Pygmy Goat

[Dr.Sack]

Kaepernick & Allen would be a good mix. Cut Peterman.

[MJS]

I don't want a super expensive backup QB who has recently been playing like crap and has a novel sized injury history.

 

Seriously, Bradford has extorted more money out of this league than any player I can remember.

[Warcodered]

 

[kota]

There is something called a salary cap.

[danc]

3 hours ago, Drunken Pygmy Goat said:

Nah. Ride or die this season with Allen. This isn't a contending team, so keep the draft picks. If Allen gets hurt, we may be subjected to more NP, and a street FA will be signed, but it will likely result in a better draft position. 

 

IMO a team should trade away picks for immediate, "impactful" help at QB only if the team has a shot at conteding. 

I think this is the way Bills management is going.  Allen or bust! If Allen gets hurt pick up a FA and see if he is worth keeping next season.  We need the draft picks. 

[Buffalo Barbarian]

No, we need those picks to rebuild . If Allen goes down we bring in Moore or Anderson.

 

 

[Fadingpain]

Most teams are structured in such a manner that if the starting QB goes down for an appreciable amount of time, the season is forfeited.  And most teams seem OK with that arrangement. 

 

We could still benefit from a better backup however.

 

Peterman is not really a backup caliber player.  He is more of a #3.

 

 

 

 

[Doc Brown]

If we didn't draft EJ Manuel, would we people here be floating his name as a backup upgrade over Peterman?  My guess is yes.

[Pbomb]

4 hours ago, GoodHands15 said:

 

Make no mistake. Bradford’s one of the smarter qbs in the nfl imo.

 

He mentored Carson Wentz didn’t he?

 

Carson wentz started right away.  I think this whole “mentoring thing” is a little overrated, that is what coaches are for 

[nucci]

5 hours ago, GoodHands15 said:

Hey guys. Quick thought to think.

 

Fiscally irrisponsibe to trade for Sam Bradford since JA on rookie deal?

 

SB>NP

SB$=AJM$

SbContractLength=1

 

Plus we could always sell Bradford if someone else needs to buy him.

 

Bad idea?

 

I get Nate Peterman knows x’s and o’s but I’d like to think Bradford could teach.

Why would any other team want him....why would the Bills want him......do you watch him play....he is awful

[GunnerBill]

No, no, no, no. 

 

Of course Sam Bradford is better than Nathan Peterman. There are QBs who have been retired a decade who are better than him. 

 

But can we stop proposing giving up assets for sticking plasters? It is not a good idea at wide receiver, nor at Quarterback. 

 

I would bring a guy off the street to replace Nate - even if Matt Moore is done there are other guys out there - hell Bryce Petty is an upgrade on Nathan Peterman. 

 

But keep our assets. They are vital for building this team around Josh and the other young pieces we have. 

[ganesh]

5 hours ago, Rochesterfan said:

Not something I want to see.  Bradford is not good and very expensive.  Rather see a cheap deal for Moore  than see them waste a pick and money on Bradford.

 

Huge No Thanks!!

 

At this point I would like to just bring in Derek Anderson to support the rookie QB. 

[Kmart128]

Doesn't he getbpaud like 20 million the year. Not only would that make it a horrendous deal I don't think we can afford him.

[OldTimeAFLGuy]

6 hours ago, GoodHands15 said:

Hey guys. Quick thought to think.

 

Fiscally irrisponsibe to trade for Sam Bradford since JA on rookie deal?

 

SB>NP

SB$=AJM$

SbContractLength=1

 

Plus we could always sell Bradford if someone else needs to buy him.

 

Bad idea?

 

I get Nate Peterman knows x’s and o’s but I’d like to think Bradford could teach.

 

....shipped in three boxes......assembly required...............

[Pine Barrens Mafia]

6 hours ago, GoodHands15 said:

 

Sizzling hot take

 

Perfectly reasonable take