GoodHands15 Posted September 26, 2018 Posted September 26, 2018 Hey guys. Quick thought to think. Fiscally irrisponsibe to trade for Sam Bradford since JA on rookie deal? SB>NP SB$=AJM$ SbContractLength=1 Plus we could always sell Bradford if someone else needs to buy him. Bad idea? I get Nate Peterman knows x’s and o’s but I’d like to think Bradford could teach. 1 1
Rochesterfan Posted September 26, 2018 Posted September 26, 2018 Not something I want to see. Bradford is not good and very expensive. Rather see a cheap deal for Moore than see them waste a pick and money on Bradford. Huge No Thanks!! 4
Fan in Chicago Posted September 26, 2018 Posted September 26, 2018 4 minutes ago, GoodHands15 said: Bad idea? Yes 4
GoodHands15 Posted September 26, 2018 Author Posted September 26, 2018 (edited) Thought so. I just feel like Nate is unreasonably bad. But you’re right why waste a pick. I wonder if they regret the AJM trade Edited September 26, 2018 by GoodHands15 1
JoeF Posted September 26, 2018 Posted September 26, 2018 1 minute ago, Rochesterfan said: Not something I want to see. Bradford is not good and very expensive. Rather see a cheap deal for Moore than see them waste a pick and money on Bradford. Huge No Thanks!! Moore is refusing try-outs. Rumor from some of the rag-sites on the Internets today is that his arm is shot. https://www.yardbarker.com/nfl/articles/matt_moore_turns_down_titans_workout/s1_14819_27356009
BuffaloRebound Posted September 26, 2018 Posted September 26, 2018 We do need a legit backup QB. Peterman can’t be anything other than a #3 QB. A guy like Matt Moore is probably a better and less expensive option though.
klos63 Posted September 26, 2018 Posted September 26, 2018 16 minutes ago, GoodHands15 said: Hey guys. Quick thought to think. Fiscally irrisponsibe to trade for Sam Bradford since JA on rookie deal? SB>NP SB$=AJM$ SbContractLength=1 Plus we could always sell Bradford if someone else needs to buy him. Bad idea? I get Nate Peterman knows x’s and o’s but I’d like to think Bradford could teach. teach what?
Brianmoorman4jesus Posted September 26, 2018 Posted September 26, 2018 We definitely need a backup qb that can be relied on but Bradford looks like he’s done. There has got to be a guy that we can bring in here for a decent price, if Allen gets dinged up Peterman is going in and I’m not sure how that’s ok.
GoodHands15 Posted September 26, 2018 Author Posted September 26, 2018 6 minutes ago, klos63 said: teach what? Make no mistake. Bradford’s one of the smarter qbs in the nfl imo. He mentored Carson Wentz didn’t he?
BuffaloBillyG Posted September 26, 2018 Posted September 26, 2018 14 minutes ago, BuffaloRebound said: We do need a legit backup QB. Peterman can’t be anything other than a #3 QB. A guy like Matt Moore is probably a better and less expensive option though. Matt Moore just turned down tryouts with the 49ers and Titans. Word is his arm is shot. Bradford is a terrible idea. Give up a pick+ Bad play+expensive= 2 games til hurt. Right now if anyone other than Josh Allen is taking snaps from center we are in deep deep trouble and thats not changing,with anyone thats currently unsigned. 1
Gugny Posted September 26, 2018 Posted September 26, 2018 When you say, "quick thought," does that mean you realize how ridiculous it is before the thought is actually complete? 1 3
BurpleBull Posted September 26, 2018 Posted September 26, 2018 29 minutes ago, GoodHands15 said: Hey guys. Quick thought to think. Fiscally irrisponsibe to trade for Sam Bradford since JA on rookie deal? SB>NP SB$=AJM$ SbContractLength=1 Plus we could always sell Bradford if someone else needs to buy him. Bad idea? I get Nate Peterman knows x’s and o’s but I’d like to think Bradford could teach. Bradford's not a car. 1
BillsFan130 Posted September 26, 2018 Posted September 26, 2018 Bradford sucks. Gets overpaid, gets overrated by fans/analysts, and gets injured every single year 1
GoodHands15 Posted September 26, 2018 Author Posted September 26, 2018 5 minutes ago, BurpleBull said: Bradford's not a car. He’s a human being! 2
Big Gun Posted September 26, 2018 Posted September 26, 2018 34 minutes ago, GoodHands15 said: Hey guys. Quick thought to think. Fiscally irrisponsibe to trade for Sam Bradford since JA on rookie deal? SB>NP SB$=AJM$ SbContractLength=1 Plus we could always sell Bradford if someone else needs to buy him. Bad idea? I get Nate Peterman knows x’s and o’s but I’d like to think Bradford could teach. No
Clyde Smith Posted September 26, 2018 Posted September 26, 2018 Oh heck no, I rather we trade for Larry. 2
GoodHands15 Posted September 26, 2018 Author Posted September 26, 2018 2 minutes ago, billsfan11 said: Bradford sucks. Gets overpaid, gets overrated by fans/analysts, and gets injured every single year Sizzling hot take
Recommended Posts