Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
34 minutes ago, TPS said:

One game doesn’t indicate a trend. After this week’s win, they will make a Lambeau Leap up the charts!

True, but to act as if they did not just win a game against the expected NFC champion on the road and write as if they have been playing consistently badly all year is just, well, lazy, and not a little ridiculous. 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted

These things are a suck-up contest for web views.

 

Redskins, Cowboys, Patriots, et al: get reality+5 bonus positions because they are large market teams. Must get their fan clicks.

 

The Buffalo's and Cleveland's of the league get shuffled to the bottom more than justified...because there are fewer web readers to offend.

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted
12 minutes ago, ShadyBillsFan said:

a counter point if you will 

 

If Cleveland had the better all around team  why were they w/o a W until the JETS and way was Tyrod benched?  

 

they don't pay attention.  They just write the crap that comes to mind w/o any read research.  

 

Biggest point spread blowout in 23 years!!!! 

 

 

Another counter point, they are two missed kicks away from beating both the Steelers AND the Saints (on the road). They have a great defense. 

 

As for Tyrod, the offense wasn't getting it done and Baker gave them a spark. 

 

Also, unlike us, they didn't have two lopsided losses on their ledger.

 

I completely agree it's ridiculous CLE had the bigger jump than BUF. I think Cleveland winning was such a monumental moment (I mean, how can it not be?) that ESPN is overrating that win (by moving the Browns up 5 spots vs the Bills 2) vs the Bills beating the Vikings, the way more impressive win, which warrants a bigger jump than the Browns. Even though the Browns were within inches of winning their first two games. Was Baker the only reason? Hell no. He was one reason. That's a solid team. 

Posted
13 minutes ago, TigerJ said:

ESPN power rankings always demonstrate a certain amount of inertia when it comes to certain teams.  Buffalo is one of those teams.  They are one of the slowest to move the Bills up after the Bills experience some success.  New England is always going to be moved down very slowly when they have losses.  To a certain extent, that can be justified by Bill Belichick's long record of success, which includes years when the Patriots start out struggleing and end up winning the Super Bowl.  If Buffalo beats Green Bay, I could see them moving up in the 26-27 range.  I've seen other power rankings today where the Bills are as high as 26.  

There also might be the factor that in the past, these rankings HAVE actually moved the Bills up for the 5-2 start only to watch them fall hard, so there might be a "won't be fooled again" factor to all of this that persists even after last year when they did collapse, but pulled out of it to become one of the top 12 by playoff status.

Posted
6 minutes ago, thurst44 said:

There also might be the factor that in the past, these rankings HAVE actually moved the Bills up for the 5-2 start only to watch them fall hard, so there might be a "won't be fooled again" factor to all of this that persists even after last year when they did collapse, but pulled out of it to become one of the top 12 by playoff status.

Could be.  If so, then they are being influenced by a past that includes a different coach, mostly different players, different GM, different team president and different owner.  Oh yeah, they still play in the same stadium.  There must be a curse on New Era Field.

Posted (edited)
23 minutes ago, Big C said:

The only power rankings worth reading are Elliott Harrison's at NFL.com 

 

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000966398/article/nfl-power-rankings-week-4-rams-chiefs-rise-above-chaos

 

He's got the Pats at 13 and the Bills up to 27.

imo  a 3-0 team shouldn't be below TWO 1-1-1 teams, one that just blew the biggest upset in 23 years and the other needed Fitz to well be Fitz with 3 first half INT's to get its first W.

 

So as worthy as it is a read, it has flaws 

Edited by ShadyBillsFan
Posted
1 hour ago, EersN'Bills said:

 

Another counter point, they are two missed kicks away from beating both the Steelers AND the Saints (on the road). They have a great defense. 

 

As for Tyrod, the offense wasn't getting it done and Baker gave them a spark. 

 

Also, unlike us, they didn't have two lopsided losses on their ledger.

 

I completely agree it's ridiculous CLE had the bigger jump than BUF. I think Cleveland winning was such a monumental moment (I mean, how can it not be?) that ESPN is overrating that win (by moving the Browns up 5 spots vs the Bills 2) vs the Bills beating the Vikings, the way more impressive win, which warrants a bigger jump than the Browns. Even though the Browns were within inches of winning their first two games. Was Baker the only reason? Hell no. He was one reason. That's a solid team. 

 

I think it has more to do with Buffalo getting blown out the 1st 2 games than it does with comparing wins vs the Vikings and Jets.  Obviously the Viking win is more impressive,  but with a FG kicker the Browns beat the Saints, and possibly the Steelers too. Buffalo wasn't close the 1st 2 weeks.

Posted
5 minutes ago, fergie's ire said:

Answer:

 

zane gonzalez.jpg

You can believe Cleveland is better.   

 

1-31 now 2-31-1     

I don't believe they are better.  jmo 

Bills 1-2 

 

INSERT PICTURE NATE PETERMAN 

13 minutes ago, mattynh said:

"The Bills' offense has gone three-and-out on 54 percent of drives this season, on pace to be the highest rate for any team in the past 15 seasons."  LOL

see above 

Posted
14 minutes ago, ShadyBillsFan said:

You can believe Cleveland is better.   

 

1-31 now 2-31-1     

I don't believe they are better.  jmo 

Bills 1-2 

 

INSERT PICTURE NATE PETERMAN 

see above 

 

How much of that stat was week one alone?

 

Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, joesixpack said:

 

How much of that stat was week one alone?

 

For Buffalo?

 

Zero point Zero QB rating in the first half 

 

The  weather sucked, there was no run game and a rookie cold of the bench  wasn't expected to do much  much less a 35 point comeback 

 

For Cleveland? 

The Steelers got lucky with FITZ's 3 INT's and I hear he Flopped" to get a Roughing the QB penalty.  

 

Saints have a habit of starting slow 

 

Edited by ShadyBillsFan
×
×
  • Create New...