oldmanfan Posted September 16, 2018 Posted September 16, 2018 3 minutes ago, MAJBobby said: In that case why did we sign Star to a 50M contract. Or Trade for KB or sign Newhouse and Bodine or Bring back Zay and if he turns into a problem he is cut no harm. See how easy that is Which of them had multiple suspensions? You draw comparisons that have no basis in reality. And if he turns into a problem and you cut him who would be first in line blasting management for signing him? A guy named MAJBobby.
NoSaint Posted September 16, 2018 Posted September 16, 2018 Just now, oldmanfan said: Which of them had multiple suspensions? You draw comparisons that have no basis in reality. And if he turns into a problem and you cut him who would be first in line blasting management for signing him? A guy named MAJBobby. Unless they gave a high pick of guaranteed dollars, I don’t mind a short leash. I’d hope it a reasonable length though (realistic expectations and all).
cle23 Posted September 16, 2018 Posted September 16, 2018 (edited) 11 minutes ago, MAJBobby said: Yeah I did. Sure as hell wasnt watching the Bills game. He was open alot. And TT well we no cant throw inside the numbers Again all speculative He has been suspended more games than he has played in his career. There is nothing speculative there. Edited September 16, 2018 by cle23
MAJBobby Posted September 16, 2018 Posted September 16, 2018 2 minutes ago, QuoteTheRaven83 said: LOL. Yet somehow Jarvis got 108 yds and 7 receptions...Odd. Gordon should be used to playing 5 games a season and having a full year or 2 off to get in shape on his own. Yet he managed to do fairly well in previous years considering he plays about a quarter of a full season. Again. You want to give money or waste a draft pick for a player who never plays? Sure...Whatever floats your boat, but thank god you're not running this team. Yep why not theh are giving over 50M to players that really never plays. Compared to your mythical never plays (even if he had 68 snaps last week) 2 minutes ago, oldmanfan said: Which of them had multiple suspensions? You draw comparisons that have no basis in reality. And if he turns into a problem and you cut him who would be first in line blasting management for signing him? A guy named MAJBobby. Where did I bash management for Trading for Coleman. Have fun trying to find that
oldmanfan Posted September 16, 2018 Posted September 16, 2018 1 minute ago, NoSaint said: Unless they gave a high pick of guaranteed dollars, I don’t mind a short leash. I’d hope it a reasonable length though (realistic expectations and all). My feeling is he'd make promises and just get in trouble again.
MAJBobby Posted September 16, 2018 Posted September 16, 2018 1 minute ago, cle23 said: He has been suspended more games than he has played in his career. There is no speculative there. Sure it is speculative saying anything about a relapse with no failed test. Just like it is speculative saying Martavis Bryant is getting suspended (hasnt happened yet has it)
Peter Posted September 16, 2018 Posted September 16, 2018 31 minutes ago, billsgpr88 said: Hmm, Philip Seymour Hoffman (Rochester native btw) had an accomplished, prolific career for over 20 years.. But I see what you're saying; there are about 50 famous musicians who fall into this category, and as it was for Hoffman, heroine is usually the vice that causes it. Clearly, PSH was much more accomplished. I just hate to see people's lives ruined because of an addiction that is so strong that it can suck you back in like this. 1
oldmanfan Posted September 16, 2018 Posted September 16, 2018 2 minutes ago, MAJBobby said: Yep why not theh are giving over 50M to players that really never plays. Compared to your mythical never plays (even if he had 68 snaps last week) Where did I bash management for Trading for Coleman. Have fun trying to find that What in the hell are you talking about now? This is in response to your Star/JB/ Newhouse etc tirade. Just now, Peter said: Clearly, PSH was much more accomplished. I just hate to see people's lives ruined because of an addiction that is so strong that it can suck you back in like this. Couldn't agree more 1
MAJBobby Posted September 16, 2018 Posted September 16, 2018 (edited) 1 minute ago, oldmanfan said: What in the hell are you talking about now? This is in response to your Star/JB/ Newhouse etc tirade. Guy said if you want to pay money to have someone NOT play. Well this FO does that alot with record dead cap. Try to follow along will ya i know talented WRs go against the blue collar 1960s football this fan base loves so much Edited September 16, 2018 by MAJBobby
NoSaint Posted September 16, 2018 Posted September 16, 2018 Just now, oldmanfan said: My feeling is he'd make promises and just get in trouble again. Unless you think it’s within the first week or two... I have to ask... so what? would you be upset if they traded a 7 and got 8 games 600 yards and 5 touchdowns from him? The discussion isn’t for Gordon to be the long term answer. It’s whether he can help take a little pressure off allen for 3 months. 1
BuffaloBillsGospel Posted September 16, 2018 Posted September 16, 2018 3 hours ago, HamSandwhich said: That can't be it. No way they spend all that time and this is what broke the camels back. That's what happens with a GM with a no nonsense policy, it's a team sport and there always has to be an example.
oldmanfan Posted September 16, 2018 Posted September 16, 2018 Just now, MAJBobby said: Guy said if you want to pay money to have someone NOT play. Well this FO does that alot with record dead cap. Try to follow along will ya The response to my post. What are you smoking tonight? No wonder you're a Gordon guy.
eanyills Posted September 16, 2018 Posted September 16, 2018 (edited) I’m a huge Josh Gordon superfan, I have been since his breakout year in Clevo. He’s got elite talent and could have been a top-5 receiver in the league if he could have kept his head on straight. I watched Gordon last year with Kizer and last week with Tyrod. He should have had 3 TD’s last week (one called back on a penalty, one underthrown INT). He’s still got it. I could see the Browns throwing shade on him (with that “not himself” line) if the release is only for the injury/lateness. From a PR standpoint, it makes sense. They did the same thing with Coleman. I can’t imagine this situation is going to help Gordon’s mental health, though.The guy’s on the verge of falling off the tracks and receiving a lifetime ban. I wish him well, wherever he goes.It’s worth the risk for some team but that team isn’t Buffalo. Edited September 16, 2018 by eanyills
Dopey Posted September 16, 2018 Posted September 16, 2018 3 hours ago, One Buffalo said: "Was not himself"... They should have given him a Snickers. 1
oldmanfan Posted September 16, 2018 Posted September 16, 2018 1 minute ago, NoSaint said: Unless you think it’s within the first week or two... I have to ask... so what? would you be upset if they traded a 7 and got 8 games 600 yards and 5 touchdowns from him? The discussion isn’t for Gordon to be the long term answer. It’s whether he can help take a little pressure off allen for 3 months. I think it would be in the first week or two.
MAJBobby Posted September 16, 2018 Posted September 16, 2018 2 minutes ago, oldmanfan said: The response to my post. What are you smoking tonight? No wonder you're a Gordon guy. You quoted my multipe quote thread. One to the other guy about paying players that wont play. Now the response to your was where did I bash management for trading for Coleman. Good luck finding it. So see what I mean to try and follow along. 4 minutes ago, BuffaloBillsGospel said: That's what happens with a GM with a no nonsense policy, it's a team sport and there always has to be an example. Or you have a GM that wants his guys anyway so the older regime players have to walk on eggshells. See last year in Buffalo 6 minutes ago, Dopey said: "Was not himself"... They should have given him a Snickers. Yeah because you know having a bad day or “not yourself” is always a red flag for substance abuse. According to some here
cle23 Posted September 16, 2018 Posted September 16, 2018 3 minutes ago, MAJBobby said: Or you have a GM that wants his guys anyway so the older regime players have to walk on eggshells. See last year in Buffalo Why wouldn't he have cut him before training camp, or after he missed training camp, if that was the case?
BuffaloBillsGospel Posted September 16, 2018 Posted September 16, 2018 2 minutes ago, MAJBobby said: You quoted my multipe quote thread. One to the other guy about paying players that wont play. Now the response to your was where did I bash management for trading for Coleman. Good luck finding it. So see what I mean to try and follow along. Or you have a GM that wants his guys anyway so the older regime players have to walk on eggshells. See last year in Buffalo That's with any job, if you're made the boss you bring in guys you trust (coaches) and you bring in employees you hand pick (players) to make the place run how you see fit correct? I don't think The coach or GM here got rid of players just because they were Whaley's players I think he got rid of them because they either didn't fit their scheme (Darby/the ILB that went to KC) or because of personality and overpayment (WR Woods, WR Watkins, DT Dareus), just my opinion though.
MAJBobby Posted September 16, 2018 Posted September 16, 2018 Just now, cle23 said: Why wouldn't he have cut him before training camp, or after he missed training camp, if that was the case? Because he didnt mess up. He wasnt late. Saturday he was late and Dorsey cut him. Why did Dareus get traded into the season?
NoSaint Posted September 16, 2018 Posted September 16, 2018 1 minute ago, cle23 said: Why wouldn't he have cut him before training camp, or after he missed training camp, if that was the case? He likely gave him a one strike rule and coming in late with an injury that annoyed them was that strike.
Recommended Posts