Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
5 minutes ago, MAJBobby said:

 

How many NFL teams have a FB. And does that hurt them EVER??? Jist goes right in line with the 1960s Thinking of football from this fanbase and regime 

 

How many fans go crazy about a journeyman WR that had 2 catches for 7 yards?

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, MAJBobby said:

 

How many NFL teams have a FB. And does that hurt them EVER??? Jist goes right in line with the 1960s Thinking of football from this fanbase and regime 

 

You should get off this forum for a while. It's been a few hours. Maybe get some air. 

Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, White Linen said:

 

How many fans go crazy about a journeyman WR that had 2 catches for 7 yards?

 

Again are you starting a Rookie QB?  Doesnt it make sense to have Weapons for your Rookie QB. I mean football speaking as you say. Specially when one of your WRs is coming off an INJ and has not practiced Fully yet since camp

 

And if you wanted your 4th DT maybe cut Lacy a LBer that does Nothing for you instead of cutting in a super weak position Already. And leave your Rookie QB with all the weapons you can get him you know FOOTBALL SPEAKING as you say

Edited by MAJBobby
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
15 minutes ago, MAJBobby said:

 

Ok then he better have over 10 snaps whats do you think those odds will be?

Depends on the Offense they are playing against.
not a stat i judge by. Context,

 Every offense and defense Bills go up against are game planned for. whether Bills run heavy sets. spread em out. Go deep and over the top.chunk plays, horizontal. good teams change each week.
If Coaches could have more specialized package players they would. Yes player flexibility is very important !
But Star was brought in to stop the runners and eat them. He is not a penetrating rusher like Kyle is.

12 minutes ago, ScottLaw said:

Eventually people will realize McBeane aren't some geniuses with a "plan" and are just some inexperienced guys making a lot of mistakes as they try and figure this thing out. 

 

Its what you get when your inexperienced owner who doesn't know the sport too well is easily swayed during the interview process. 

because i love you

you are likely full on correct with your perspective. except the bolded. I do not think The Pegulas will ever make the Rex mistake again.

Hi  Russ  !

Edited by 3rdand12
Posted
3 hours ago, Steptide said:

Genius! We don't need any reciever help

Much like our two youngsters at QB who were both clearly "ready" based on preseason performance, it has been proven that our young receiving corps is not in need of any veteran presence at all.

Posted
1 minute ago, 3rdand12 said:

Depends on the Offense they are playing against.
not a stat i judge by. Context,

 Every offense and defense Bills go up against are game planned for. whether Bills run heavy sets. spread em out. Go deep and over the top.chunk plays, horizontal. good teams change each week.
If Coaches could have more specialized package players they would. Yes player flexibility is very important !
But Star was brought in to stop the runners and eat them. He is not a penetrating rusher like Kyle is.

 

Then he was way overpaid bit not going to get into this here. But fine you NEED a 4 DT ok I get it. Do you NEED Lacy? 4 OTs? 4 OGs? 2 C? A FB that gives you nothing. A RB that does the same?

 

There are so many OTHER Players to cut instead of stripping a weapon from your Rookie QB in his first start when you have a WR that hasnt had a full go practice since camp. 

 

Posted
13 minutes ago, dabills21 said:

What if I am?  Still doesn't change the fact that we need 4 healthy DTs to rotate and Kerley isn't changing the outcome if we have success passing the football tomorrow...

 

News flash, Josh Allen will still be the one throwing passes to equally as talented receivers 

 

Then why did they release Washington in the first place?  If they felt that they had to do this, then why didn't they just promote Thomas from the PS in the first place?

 

10 minutes ago, White Linen said:

 

We didn't get into the good and smart decisions.  We just debated the bad one's on offense.  To be clear, I'm not a homer and I'm not totally defending them.  They've made mistakes, they've made good decisions and there's a ton of incomplete grades.  I'm nervous but I'm also not ready to say they can't get this done either.  

 

What "good decisions" would those be, especially on offense?   Trading away Darby for  Matthews wasn't a good move.  Neither was letting EJ Gaines walk away.  Trading away Watkins who was the only speed receiver the Bills had and who could catch anything near him for a draft pick and then using a draft pick to get Kelvin, a much less talented receiver with chronically bad knees and apparently stone hands doesn't look particularly good either. 

 

 

Posted
12 minutes ago, MAJBobby said:

 

How many NFL teams have a FB. And does that hurt them EVER??? Jist goes right in line with the 1960s Thinking of football from this fanbase and regime 

i am pleased you have included your self here amongst us.

 or have you ?

Posted (edited)
20 minutes ago, dabills21 said:

1. we need Wrs to fill out the training camp roster

2. he was signed Before the draft

3. he provides veteran guidance to a young wr core

4. he likely wouldn't have made final cuts if Ray Ray wasn't injured

 

Releasing Kerley doesn't dictate or even directionally measure the overall plan that Beane and McDermott have.  He was a fringe player, not someone they were counting toward their future "core"

That Fringe player was starting.  It seems a vet would help a guy like Allen.  Seems there were better options to let go of.  No, Kerley isn't the future, but that was the case when they signed him and when they started him last week.  Ray Ray hasn't practiced fully this week.  I don't know if his status had anything to do with Kerley.

Edited by purple haze
Posted
3 minutes ago, MAJBobby said:

 

Again are you starting a Rookie QB?  Doesnt it make sense to have Weapons for your Rookie QB. I mean football speaking as you say. Specially when one of your WRs is coming off an INJ and has not practiced Fully yet since camp

 

And if you wanted your 4th DT maybe cut Lacy a LBer that does Nothing for you instead of cutting in a super weak position Already. And leave your Rookie QB with all the weapons you can get him you know FOOTBALL SPEAKING as you say

 

You're question has been responded to and you won't hear it.  You're stuck on that it's a stupid move and won't consider another thought.  

 

Several of us have said on the surface it doesn't make sense so let's try to discuss why it would make sense to THEM that are running the team.  Responses have been given but if we don't agree that they're stupid and you know better - then we're dumb too.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

I don't understand the move myself.  The DT I get.  I wonder if they see better matchups with the TEs vs. WRs tomorrow.

 

Be interesting to see the inactive tomorrow.  If Lee sits again I'll be scratching my head.

Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, oldmanfan said:

I don't understand the move myself.  The DT I get.  I wonder if they see better matchups with the TEs vs. WRs tomorrow.

 

Be interesting to see the inactive tomorrow.  If Lee sits again I'll be scratching my head.

Khari you mean ?
I think they like he and Croom and have some hope. Thomas is a bit of a hybrid so they need to make use of him. But they ALL need to learn how to block and quick !!

 

: ) 

Edited by 3rdand12
Grammar
Posted
Just now, 3rdand12 said:

Khari you mean ?
I think they like him and Croom and have some hope. Thomas is a bit of a hybrid so they need to make use of him. But they ALL need to learn how to block and quick !!

 

: ) 

Yeah Khari.  He's their blocking TE.  Given they let a WR go andvthe state of the line I will be stunned if he sits tomorrow.

Posted
2 minutes ago, oldmanfan said:

I don't understand the move myself.  The DT I get.  I wonder if they see better matchups with the TEs vs. WRs tomorrow.

 

Be interesting to see the inactive tomorrow.  If Lee sits again I'll be scratching my head.

Will the Chargers be stacking the box ? and force the throwing game ?

Posted
1 minute ago, QCity said:

Hysterics over Jeremy Kerley. 

 

Seriously?

Earlier this week there was hysteria over a RT from the practice squad, so this shouldn't becsurprising.  Not that I understand the Kerley move.

Posted
Just now, oldmanfan said:

Yeah Khari.  He's their blocking TE.  Given they let a WR go andvthe state of the line I will be stunned if he sits tomorrow.

Very good point then.
Lets hope Dimarco gets some reps as well then !

 MAJbobby and others might be placated some what..

Posted
1 minute ago, 3rdand12 said:

Will the Chargers be stacking the box ? and force the throwing game ?

We'll see.  I like everyone am very interested to see how Allen does.   I hope they let him loose -and don't try to coddle him.  Of course it would help if the line and guys like Benjamin decide to play.

Posted
Just now, oldmanfan said:

We'll see.  I like everyone am very interested to see how Allen does.   I hope they let him loose -and don't try to coddle him.  Of course it would help if the line and guys like Benjamin decide to play.

They sure need to make a solid effort to help the kid out. Daboll as well.

×
×
  • Create New...