Fadingpain Posted September 12, 2018 Posted September 12, 2018 I guess Josh Allen suddenly went from "not ready" to "ready" in 72 hours, mostly because Nate Peterman sucks. McD doesn't have a F-ing clue.
Roundybout Posted September 12, 2018 Posted September 12, 2018 4 minutes ago, Fadingpain said: I guess Josh Allen suddenly went from "not ready" to "ready" in 72 hours, mostly because Nate Peterman sucks. McD doesn't have a F-ing clue. Or he wanted to test the o-line in a real game. But yeah, let's overreact some more. 2
mabden Posted September 12, 2018 Posted September 12, 2018 The Dow Jones Industrials are up 88 points since McDermott announced Josh Allen starting on Sunday!!!! Go Josh! 2
Heitz Posted September 12, 2018 Posted September 12, 2018 3 minutes ago, Fadingpain said: I guess Josh Allen suddenly went from "not ready" to "ready" in 72 hours, mostly because Nate Peterman sucks. McD doesn't have a F-ing clue. You make it sound like Peterman was "95% ready" and Allen was "25% ready", maybe they're both 85% ready but Peterman "won TC and the preseason" so he got the start. So yeah, Peterman sucked in game one so Allen, who is potentially almost as ready, gets the start. 1
ColoradoBills Posted September 12, 2018 Posted September 12, 2018 44 minutes ago, Kaenon said: Use the run to set up the pass. 7 attempts for Shady last weekend. Ravens had 8-9 in the box. No way a running game works with that. If the Bills are starting JA then you play him like a NFL QB. They need to attempt a balanced attack. IMO
Fadingpain Posted September 12, 2018 Posted September 12, 2018 (edited) 8 minutes ago, BillsEnthusiast said: Or he wanted to test the o-line in a real game. But yeah, let's overreact some more. Overreact? Peterman is, statistically, one of the 3 worst QBs to play in the new century. Allen is raw and not ready. We just suffered the second worst beat-down in franchise history. Yes, suggesting the coaching staff is in bit over their beads must surely be the product of wild speculation and knee-jerk overreaction. 8 minutes ago, Heitz said: You make it sound like Peterman was "95% ready" and Allen was "25% ready", maybe they're both 85% ready but Peterman "won TC and the preseason" so he got the start. So yeah, Peterman sucked in game one so Allen, who is potentially almost as ready, gets the start. Josh Allen is, by far, the most important asset this organization possesses right now. This coaching staff just told you 72 hours ago that he was not ready to start an NFL game. That fact hasn't changed simply b/c Nate Peterman is beyond terrible. And yet Allen will now be started. If he can start this Sunday, he should have started last Sunday. If he couldn't start last Sunday, he is not going to be ready to start Week 2. This coaching staff looks like idiots right now, however much you want to defend them. Edited September 12, 2018 by Fadingpain 1
Kirby Jackson Posted September 12, 2018 Posted September 12, 2018 15 minutes ago, Fadingpain said: I guess Josh Allen suddenly went from "not ready" to "ready" in 72 hours, mostly because Nate Peterman sucks. McD doesn't have a F-ing clue. When you only have 1 NFL QB on the roster he has to play. That was evident before last week. The Bills can try to add an NFL QB to help mentor Allen but this is (and was) going to be his team at some point. That was inevitable. If they had even a McCarron they could have brought Allen along slower. They don't have that luxury.
atlbillsfan1975 Posted September 12, 2018 Posted September 12, 2018 I want to believe this was the plan all along. That Beane, Mcdermott, and Daboll all knew that Allen would start due to it being a necessity. Reason i kind of think this might be the case is Tyrod being traded, AJ being traded, and only having Peterman as the 'vet'. Basically the staff and Beane made this happen. If Tyrod was still here he would be Tyrod. Do just enough to keep you around in a game but never take a game over and win it. AJ would of had games like Tyrod did. Show he can be a competent back up and even win some games, albeit not by his doing going for 300+ yards and 3 touchdowns. More like a serviceable starter . With Peterman looking as terrible as he did there is no way the Bills start him unless they have no choice. Like i said i want to believe this. Otherwise it means Beane, McDermott, and Daboll got fooled by Peterman in preseason. Give me your opinion. I am honestly looking for the other side of it.
yungmack Posted September 12, 2018 Posted September 12, 2018 31 minutes ago, Boatdrinks said: The Chiefs had Alex Smith. That decision was an easy one. McDermottt and Beane have boxed themselves in with no credible alternative at QB to turn to. That’s on them. Starting Nathan Peterman in another game would be an embarrassment ; an amateurish move that would finish their careers. Trading McCarron has compounded the situation. There is no chance he would look as incompetetent as Peterman. Sure , a truly seasoned vet should have been brought in but AJM could have held the fort down and gave Allen the redshirt year he probably needs. You are absolutely correct that the blueprint should have been the same as Mahomes, but they half stepped on a placeholder QB. Edit: best veteran options out there right now are probably D Anderson, M Moore, smokin J Cutler. They’d take a few weeks to get up to speed. What do you do? Once Allen goes in you can’t take him out except for injury, simple as that. And the Bills had Tyrod, they had AJ, and McD decided he was good to go with a rookie project and a highly suspect Peterman. If Allen gets hurt - I fear that more than him sucking - Holy McDermott, this season will be an historic wreck.
Roundybout Posted September 12, 2018 Posted September 12, 2018 10 minutes ago, Fadingpain said: Overreact? Peterman is, statistically, one of the 3 worst QBs to play in the new century. Allen is raw and not ready. We just suffered the second worst beat-down in franchise history. Yes, suggesting the coaching staff is in bit over their beads must surely be the product of wild speculation and knee-jerk overreaction. Josh Allen is, by far, the most important asset this organization possesses right now. This coaching staff just told you 72 hours ago that he was not ready to start an NFL game. That fact hasn't changed simply b/c Nate Peterman is beyond terrible. And yet Allen will now be started. If he can start this Sunday, he should have started last Sunday. If he couldn't start last Sunday, he is not going to be ready to start Week 2. This coaching staff looks like idiots right now, however much you want to defend them. Admit it, Peterman looked more than decent in preseason. As many have said here, if this was a 'true' competition, then Peterman won it fair and square. Apparently, that was a mirage, and that is why Allen is now thrust into the role. 17 games in! 1
26CornerBlitz Posted September 12, 2018 Posted September 12, 2018 24 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said:
ColoradoBills Posted September 12, 2018 Posted September 12, 2018 8 minutes ago, Fadingpain said: Overreact? Peterman is, statistically, one of the 3 worst QBs to play in the new century. Allen is raw and not ready. We just suffered the second worst beat-down in franchise history. Yes, suggesting the coaching staff is in bit over their beads must surely be the product of wild speculation and knee-jerk overreaction. Josh Allen is, by far, the most important asset this organization possesses right now. This coaching staff just told you 72 hours ago that he was not ready to start an NFL game. That fact hasn't changed simply b/c Nate Peterman is beyond terrible. And yet Allen will now be started. If he can start this Sunday, he should have started last Sunday. If he couldn't start last Sunday, he is not going to be ready to start Week 2. This coaching staff looks like idiots right now, however much you want to defend them. I will continue to support Beane/McDermott but the bolded is a fact. The all screwed the pooch on this one. How the team goes forward with this is the real question. Time will tell.
dubs Posted September 12, 2018 Posted September 12, 2018 11 minutes ago, Fadingpain said: Overreact? Peterman is, statistically, one of the 3 worst QBs to play in the new century. Allen is raw and not ready. We just suffered the second worst beat-down in franchise history. Yes, suggesting the coaching staff is in bit over their beads must surely be the product of wild speculation and knee-jerk overreaction. Josh Allen is, by far, the most important asset this organization possesses right now. This coaching staff just told you 72 hours ago that he was not ready to start an NFL game. That fact hasn't changed simply b/c Nate Peterman is beyond terrible. And yet Allen will now be started. If he can start this Sunday, he should have started last Sunday. If he couldn't start last Sunday, he is not going to be ready to start Week 2. This coaching staff looks like idiots right now, however much you want to defend them. Ummmm....you may want to up your dosage of meds. You really need to chill out. 2
John from Riverside Posted September 12, 2018 Posted September 12, 2018 We really need to temper our expectations here..... Josh Allen is not going into a perfect scenario for his start......this is probably going to be a rough year...... but this train has left the station......the Josh Era begins 2
K-9 Posted September 12, 2018 Posted September 12, 2018 10 minutes ago, Fadingpain said: Overreact? Peterman is, statistically, one of the 3 worst QBs to play in the new century. Allen is raw and not ready. We just suffered the second worst beat-down in franchise history. Yes, suggesting the coaching staff is in bit over their beads must surely be the product of wild speculation and knee-jerk overreaction. Josh Allen is, by far, the most important asset this organization possesses right now. This coaching staff just told you 72 hours ago that he was not ready to start an NFL game. That fact hasn't changed simply b/c Nate Peterman is beyond terrible. And yet Allen will now be started. If he can start this Sunday, he should have started last Sunday. If he couldn't start last Sunday, he is not going to be ready to start Week 2. This coaching staff looks like idiots right now, however much you want to defend them. Of course Allen isn’t miraculously any more ready than he was last week, but that’s really not the point, is it? Are you familiar with the term, “ready or not?” Because that’s the situation when there is no other QB to turn to that is any MORE ready. Idiots or not, the coaching staff has no other option. I haven’t heard any of them proclaim Allen is “any more ready”, either. Like us, they see the situation for what it is: dire. 1
ColoradoBills Posted September 12, 2018 Posted September 12, 2018 4 minutes ago, BillsEnthusiast said: Admit it, Peterman looked more than decent in preseason. As many have said here, if this was a 'true' competition, then Peterman won it fair and square. Apparently, that was a mirage, and that is why Allen is now thrust into the role. 17 games in! It's as simple as that.
K-9 Posted September 12, 2018 Posted September 12, 2018 5 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said: Time can mean more than just this season? Who knew?! That said, time will mean no more than two miserable series for half the idiots out there. 1
njbuff Posted September 12, 2018 Posted September 12, 2018 Cut Peterman and sign a veteran QB. Peterman should never see an NFL field again. Neither should 4/5’s of the OL, but that’s another story. 3
Recommended Posts