Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, Jauronimo said:

I prefer McVay over McShay.  Not to be confused with Lockport native and die hard Bills fan Tim McVeigh.    

Haha you got that one. Posting half asleep probably not a great idea. 

Edited by billsherd
Posted

A grown man named Booger? 

You pick your nose when you're 8 and you're Booger for the rest of your life?

 Growing up in S Buffalo I knew a guy named Mad Dog. I ran into him in a bar while visiting a couple years ago and asked him how he got his nickname. He shook his head and said: " you bite a kid in the face when you're 10 and you're 'Mad Dog' for the rest of your life.

Posted

Hey! After Carr's horrible performance tonight, maybe we can convince Chucky that he'd be better off with Peterman! He loves him some Nate. 

Posted (edited)
8 hours ago, Jauronimo said:

It took them 3 quarters to get anything resembling a rhythm going.  They did sign Cooks to replace Watkins and hes proving to be not much of a decoy.

 

Yeah, it's called actually producing.  McVay said he let Sammy walk because he felt he was too one-dimensional.

 

And what a tale of two halves.  Looked like the Rams made adjustments and the Raiders didn't.

Edited by Doc
Posted
2 hours ago, Doc said:

 

Yeah, it's called actually producing.  McVay said he let Sammy walk because he felt he was too one-dimensional.

 

And what a tale of two halves.  Looked like the Rams made adjustments and the Raiders didn't.

Cooks caught 5 passes for 87 yards! Decoys are supposed to be seen but not heard.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Doc said:

 

Yeah, it's called actually producing.  McVay said he let Sammy walk because he felt he was too one-dimensional.

 

And what a tale of two halves.  Looked like the Rams made adjustments and the Raiders didn't.

 

Did he really say that?  

Posted
2 minutes ago, Royale with Cheese said:

Did he really say that?  

 

That's what they said on MNF when discussing Cooks replacing Sammy.

Posted
15 minutes ago, Jauronimo said:

Cooks caught 5 passes for 87 yards! Decoys are supposed to be seen but not heard.

Also drew a 50+ yard pass interference call, now that I think about it may have been twice that he got loose for a bomb and the corner didn’t turn around and got a PI.

 

Goff didn’t connect on any deep shots but his ball did look improved from last year. 

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Doc said:

 

That's what they said on MNF when discussing Cooks replacing Sammy.

It sounded more like McFarlands opining on the matter rather than a quote. I didn’t hear him attribute that to McVay at all; perhaps I heard it wrong. Cooks is smaller/ quicker maybe, I’m not even sure about the last part. Anyway, the Rams bowed out on a bidding war and got a different player. I didn’t see him do anything spectacular and Watkins would likely get lambasted for the same stat line in a game. Not trying to change anyone’s mind here, but I’d still take Watkins on the Bills all day long. 

Edited by Boatdrinks
Posted
56 minutes ago, Boatdrinks said:

It sounded more like McFarlands opining on the matter rather than a quote. I didn’t hear him attribute that to McVay at all; perhaps I heard it wrong. Cooks is smaller/ quicker maybe, I’m not even sure about the last part. Anyway, the Rams bowed out on a bidding war and got a different player. I didn’t see him do anything spectacular and Watkins would likely get lambasted for the same stat line in a game. Not trying to change anyone’s mind here, but I’d still take Watkins on the Bills all day long. 

 

Cooks caught 5 passes for 87 yards.  That's a pretty good outing.  And IIRC, it was the guy announcing who said that, not McFarland.

Posted
10 hours ago, Doc said:

 

Cooks caught 5 passes for 87 yards.  That's a pretty good outing.  And IIRC, it was the guy announcing who said that, not McFarland.

It was McFarland 

×
×
  • Create New...