Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Yes, we could be the worst team in the NFL. Time will tell, but hear me out a little. 

 

Last year against the saints our starting qb went 9/18 for 56 yards. Our defense gave up 280 yards rushing. We lost the game 47-10, and had a late 4th quarter td by none other than nate Peterman. Ironically had Peterman not come in late in the 4th, the final score would've probably been 47-3, at home. 

 

Yes, yesterday was horrendous, and a terrible way to start the season, but I don't believe what we saw yesterday is gonna be what we see all season. It'll be really interesting to see how the bills respond next week at home 

  • Like (+1) 8
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Posted

Good post.  Let's watch the game on Sunday and I think we'll be in better position on how to assess things.  By the end of Sunday, we'll see:

- Allen start a game (hopefully)

- The team play at home

- How they respond to a bad loss (last year, they responded quite well)

- What adjustments the coaching staff makes after seeing their personnel in regular season action 

 

Next week could very well be a disaster too, but let's at least watch the game, see how it plays out and be in a more educated position to make assessments about where we're headed.

Posted

One thing in our favor is that we don't yet know just how good the Ravens are, this year.

 

That changes a lot in the NFL from year to year and who knows, maybe they will be one of the stronger teams in the east this year.

 

Having said that, I suspect they are NOT a powerhouse this year and in fact they represent the easier end of the competition we will face.  I am not saying we will get a string of franchise worst defeats this year, but we aren't going to win many games.

 

 

 

Posted

If Peterman remains the starter yesterday isn't a fluke. It's going to be a rough year. But I think this season will be a fluke. In time Bills fans will realize this was a tank season, to prepare for the long term.

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
15 minutes ago, Steptide said:

Yes, we could be the worst team in the NFL. Time will tell, but hear me out a little. 

 

Last year against the saints our starting qb went 9/18 for 56 yards. Our defense gave up 280 yards rushing. We lost the game 47-10, and had a late 4th quarter td by none other than nate Peterman. Ironically had Peterman not come in late in the 4th, the final score would've probably been 47-3, at home. 

 

Yes, yesterday was horrendous, and a terrible way to start the season, but I don't believe what we saw yesterday is gonna be what we see all season. It'll be really interesting to see how the bills respond next week at home 

so, your saying it's gonna get worse?

Posted
23 minutes ago, Steptide said:

Yes, we could be the worst team in the NFL. Time will tell, but hear me out a little. 

 

Last year against the saints our starting qb went 9/18 for 56 yards. Our defense gave up 280 yards rushing. We lost the game 47-10, and had a late 4th quarter td by none other than nate Peterman. Ironically had Peterman not come in late in the 4th, the final score would've probably been 47-3, at home. 

 

Yes, yesterday was horrendous, and a terrible way to start the season, but I don't believe what we saw yesterday is gonna be what we see all season. It'll be really interesting to see how the bills respond next week at home 

 

Unfortunately we play tough teams and a lot of them are away games. I honestly think were looking at 0-8 or 1-7

Posted

You may be right, we'll see after the Chargers/Vikings/Packers games....wait, maybe we'll revisit this after the Tex-er Colt...maybe after tha-CRAP Patriots....Bears/Jets/Jaguars......

 

Not getting blown out might be the fluke game this year.  

Posted (edited)
30 minutes ago, Steptide said:

Yes, we could be the worst team in the NFL. Time will tell, but hear me out a little. 

 

Last year against the saints our starting qb went 9/18 for 56 yards. Our defense gave up 280 yards rushing. We lost the game 47-10, and had a late 4th quarter td by none other than nate Peterman. Ironically had Peterman not come in late in the 4th, the final score would've probably been 47-3, at home. 

 

Yes, yesterday was horrendous, and a terrible way to start the season, but I don't believe what we saw yesterday is gonna be what we see all season. It'll be really interesting to see how the bills respond next week at home 

 

Except that Taylor is a better QB than Peterman and the OL wasnt missing 5 Pro Bowls across it through 3 starters no longer here.  Anyone who thinks Peterman is better than TT should never post again.  It was time for a change and I think Allen has a great future, so glad we traded TT and got back that 3rd round pick.  But Peterman is not an NFL QB, period. Big difference.  

Edited by Alphadawg7
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
17 minutes ago, HappyDays said:

If Peterman remains the starter yesterday isn't a fluke. It's going to be a rough year. But I think this season will be a fluke. In time Bills fans will realize this was a tank season, to prepare for the long term.

 

Agreed.  And the way they did it is pretty clever (i.e. having $54 million in dead cap).  

 

McD can save face and say they tried their hardest with what they had to work with. 

 

Getting rid of bad contracts and players that didn't fit their system for draft capital AND subtly setting up your tank by handicapping your team for a season with all that dead money?  Double-whammy right there.  

Edited by Capco
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted

Hate to break it to you.  Yesterday was no fluke.  We are very young at LB except Lorax; we knew going into the season that we get manhandled in the interior of the OL.  We knew this.  We knew Juan was going nowhere.  We knew the Ravens would stack the box and press up on the receivers.  We knew they would have trouble getting open.  We knew Peterman scares the bejebus out of everyone when he throws to the perimeter.  We knew all of this.  Some may have refused to believe it, but we knew it.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted (edited)

blowouts of that magnitude are kind of an anomaly anymore in a league that has a bunch of parity. so I'd say based off the odds alone, it was flukey. though I do think that if Peterman keeps playing those odds of similar games go up considerably 

Edited by Stank_Nasty
Posted

I appreciate the optimism but that wasn’t a fluke. This team is not good and has WAY more holes than last year. The saving grace will be Allen’s development. If he becomes a good QB the record this year won’t matter. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Kirby Jackson said:

I appreciate the optimism but that wasn’t a fluke. This team is not good and has WAY more holes than last year. The saving grace will be Allen’s development. If he becomes a good QB the record this year won’t matter. 

 

To me that's all I can hope for now.  If we go 2-14 or worse but I see Allen develop and has command of the offense; goes out and actually makes great reads and throws and shows he's got this, I'll accept that because then you know what you have to do after that.  You have the QB, now just build around him.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

I agree. One game does not decide the season. I think the thing I learned is that the Ravens are for real this year. They spent a lot of money revamping the offense and it appears to have worked for them. And Flacco is healthy and really playing well. They could be a playoff contender.

 

The Bills are a team that can't contend with the big dogs, but are well prepared and coached up to beat the mediocre and bad teams most of the time, at least that's how they were last year.

×
×
  • Create New...