Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Has any QB had a worse start to their career? He has three starts and all under 100 yds passing. Basically all under 50% passing. 7 picks in 42 passes. Has there ever been a worse three starts? 

 

6-14, , 66 yds, 0, td, 5 int

5-10, 57 yds, 1 td, 0 int

5-18, 24 yds, 0 td, 2 int

Posted

I believe his QB rating for today was ZERO.

 

 

6 minutes ago, ngbills said:

Has any QB had a worse start to their career? He has three starts and all under 100 yds passing. Basically all under 50% passing. 7 picks in 42 passes. Has there ever been a worse three starts? 

 

6-14, , 66 yds, 0, td, 5 int

5-10, 57 yds, 1 td, 0 int

5-18, 24 yds, 0 td, 2 int

Those "pros" drafting talent in the NFL really know their stuff, don't they! 

 

I wonder if we had simply taken best QB available from Mel Kiper's draft guide if we would have been better off.

 

 

Posted (edited)

He also already owns two records in only 3 starts:

 

Start 1 - most int's in a half.

Start 3 - Bills worst season opening loss. 

 

Edited by ngbills
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
13 minutes ago, ngbills said:

Has any QB had a worse start to their career? He has three starts and all under 100 yds passing. Basically all under 50% passing. 7 picks in 42 passes. Has there ever been a worse three starts? 

 

6-14, , 66 yds, 0, td, 5 int

5-10, 57 yds, 1 td, 0 int

5-18, 24 yds, 0 td, 2 int

 

Tom Tupa. He became a punter after his first start though. He didn't have a coach that kept pushing him out there even though he was terrible.

Posted
17 minutes ago, ngbills said:

Has any QB had a worse start to their career? He has three starts and all under 100 yds passing. Basically all under 50% passing. 7 picks in 42 passes. Has there ever been a worse three starts? 

 

6-14, , 66 yds, 0, td, 5 int

5-10, 57 yds, 1 td, 0 int

5-18, 24 yds, 0 td, 2 int

You know he’s going to likely get to add to those stats and that’s the scary thing.  It’s impressive - that the coaches and FO could be so clueless as to the talent they have at QB and on the OL.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

I feel bad for the guy. 

 

He's going to be a punchline the rest of his life, and he never should have ever been on the field. 

 

A 5th round pick starting as a rookie and as the starter in his 2nd season. What were our coaches thinking? 

  • Like (+1) 4
Posted
4 minutes ago, jrober38 said:

I feel bad for the guy. 

 

He's going to be a punchline the rest of his life, and he never should have ever been on the field. 

 

A 5th round pick starting as a rookie and as the starter in his 2nd season. What were our coaches thinking? 

 

They have gut feelings instead of using brain power. 

If you bench Tyrod because of that Saints' game performance, you HAVE to bench Peterman. Period.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Elite Poster said:

 

They have gut feelings instead of using brain power. 

And assign more weight to character and cleanliness than talent and skill and production. Character is important but not most important. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Kelly the Dog said:

And assign more weight to character and cleanliness than talent and skill and production. Character is important but not most important. 

 

Pat DiMarco made some major impacts in the game today right? I'm glad he's on the roster and he wears a captain patch to do LITERALLY nothing for this team on the field. 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, jrober38 said:

I feel bad for the guy. 

 

He's going to be a punchline the rest of his life, and he never should have ever been on the field. 

 

A 5th round pick starting as a rookie and as the starter in his 2nd season. What were our coaches thinking? 

That is the most concerning part.  They were obviously convinced enough that they were okay with a raw rookie and a 2nd year guy that had shown nothing in live regular season action to trade away McCarron.  Not that McCarron was a good pickup or would’ve been the best option, but my god Im getting the impression that they can’t assess the position at all.

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted
Just now, Ayjent said:

That is the most concerning part.  They were obviously convinced enough that they were okay with a raw rookie and a 2nd year guy that had shown nothing in live regular season action to trade away McCarron.  Not that McCarron was a good pickup or would’ve been the best option, but my god Im getting the impression that they can’t assess the position at all.

 

As am I.

 

I don't think they have any idea what a good QB prospect looks like. 

Posted
Just now, Ayjent said:

That is the most concerning part.  They were obviously convinced enough that they were okay with a raw rookie and a 2nd year guy that had shown nothing in live regular season action to trade away McCarron.  Not that McCarron was a good pickup or would’ve been the best option, but my god Im getting the impression that they can’t assess the position at all.

I don't get it either. I don't know why McCarron was traded. That was weird. I thought "Stupid move."

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
37 minutes ago, ngbills said:

Has any QB had a worse start to their career? He has three starts and all under 100 yds passing. Basically all under 50% passing. 7 picks in 42 passes. Has there ever been a worse three starts? 

 

6-14, , 66 yds, 0, td, 5 int

5-10, 57 yds, 1 td, 0 int

5-18, 24 yds, 0 td, 2 int

 

 

Well i did read in other threads from the Peterman fan club that his stats aren’t as bad as they seem.  For instance in first game, two or three of the INTs were because of the balls bouncing off the receivers hands.  In second game , Peterman should have been 10-10 because the balls bounced off the chest of the receivers . And in the third game from Today, the receivers either ran horrible routes or didn’t make an effort for the ball .

 

×
×
  • Create New...