26CornerBlitz Posted September 8, 2018 Posted September 8, 2018 Buffalo Bills QB Nathan Peterman will be 'human pinata' behind bad offensive line, says NFL analyst Bucky Brooks By Matt Parrino mparrino@nyup.com NFL network analyst Bucky Brooks thinks Buffalo Bills quarterback Nathan Peterman is in big trouble after being named the team's starting quarterback and edging out rookie first-round pick Josh Allen. "You're the human pinata. That's what (Peterman) is," Brooks said on his "Move The Sticks" podcast this week. "He's the human pinata. He's going to get beat to a pulp; They're gonna sacrifice him for four games before Josh Allen goes in. And man, those defenses. If he had a problem with the Chargers last year that first game. I'm not saying he'll throw five picks but it's gonna be tough." Brooks' co-host Daniel Jeremiah thinks the Bills will struggle to protect Peterman or Allen this season behind a poor offensive line. "Congratulations on winning the job. Your offensive line stinks and you get to play the Ravens, the Chargers, the Vikings and the Packers," Jeremiah said. "(Peterman has) played great in the preseason - I don't want to get that lost - (but) it's the preseason. When you look at their offensive line, it's not good up front. I don't know how they're going to be able to block these teams." 1
BuffaloRush Posted September 8, 2018 Posted September 8, 2018 Bucky Brooks....one of the biggest busts in Bills history. Enough said. In all reality, it’s a fair take though I think the are forgetting that Peterman gets the ball out quick to negate the rush. Plus the Bills coaches have to know how bad the line is at pass blocking. Expect lots of game planning
26CornerBlitz Posted September 8, 2018 Author Posted September 8, 2018 Just now, BuffaloRush said: Bucky Brooks....one of the biggest busts in Bills history. Enough said. In all reality, it’s a fair take though I think the are forgetting that Peterman gets the ball out quick to negate the rush. Plus the Bills coaches have to know how bad the line is at pass blocking. Expect lots of game planning Silly point to make. Enough said. 4 1
teef Posted September 8, 2018 Posted September 8, 2018 His little world might get messed up on Sunday. I’m cheering for him though. !@#$ them up Nate. 2 2
BuffaloRush Posted September 8, 2018 Posted September 8, 2018 2 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said: Silly point to make. Enough said. Silly point? It’s 100% true
26CornerBlitz Posted September 8, 2018 Author Posted September 8, 2018 (edited) 2 minutes ago, BuffaloRush said: Silly point? It’s 100% true It's irrelevant to his capabilities as an NFL analyst and his opinion of the 2018 Bills. As a 2nd round pick, he's not even close to one of the biggest busts in Bills' history. Regardless, it's not germane to the discussion. Edited September 8, 2018 by 26CornerBlitz 5 3
WMDman Posted September 8, 2018 Posted September 8, 2018 I love Bucky and I think he’s right here unfortunately 1
TSOL Posted September 8, 2018 Posted September 8, 2018 I'm sure this cheesecloth patchwork ragtag group of 3rd string mercenary offensive linemen mcbeane has gathered together will do just fine .. 2 1
MJS Posted September 8, 2018 Posted September 8, 2018 Eric Wood told a story on OBL yesterday about how a few years ago they had a similar preseason with the offensive line. Everyone dumped on them and the narrative all around the league was about how bad the oline in Buffalo was. Then they went on to lead the league in rushing and gave up among the fewest sacks in the NFL. His point was that preseason can be very different from the regular season. We may have a bad oline or may not, but it has nothing to do with how they performed in the preseason. 5 1
Augie Posted September 8, 2018 Posted September 8, 2018 I just hope he lasts through those first four games. I pray they don’t have to scrape him off the turf in the second quarter if the FIRST game. 1 1
The_Dude Posted September 8, 2018 Posted September 8, 2018 That’s how I see it. He’s getting hung out to dry while we wait to build the line we need for our future.
row_33 Posted September 8, 2018 Posted September 8, 2018 Nathan better put on his fleet of foot shoes made from angel wings
MILFHUNTER#518 Posted September 8, 2018 Posted September 8, 2018 34 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said: Buffalo Bills QB Nathan Peterman will be 'human pinata' behind bad offensive line, says NFL analyst Bucky Brooks By Matt Parrino mparrino@nyup.com NFL network analyst Bucky Brooks thinks Buffalo Bills quarterback Nathan Peterman is in big trouble after being named the team's starting quarterback and edging out rookie first-round pick Josh Allen. "You're the human pinata. That's what (Peterman) is," Brooks said on his "Move The Sticks" podcast this week. "He's the human pinata. He's going to get beat to a pulp; They're gonna sacrifice him for four games before Josh Allen goes in. And man, those defenses. If he had a problem with the Chargers last year that first game. I'm not saying he'll throw five picks but it's gonna be tough." Brooks' co-host Daniel Jeremiah thinks the Bills will struggle to protect Peterman or Allen this season behind a poor offensive line. "Congratulations on winning the job. Your offensive line stinks and you get to play the Ravens, the Chargers, the Vikings and the Packers," Jeremiah said. "(Peterman has) played great in the preseason - I don't want to get that lost - (but) it's the preseason. When you look at their offensive line, it's not good up front. I don't know how they're going to be able to block these teams." Ohhhh BOY! Peterman's in BIIIIGGGGG TROUBLE GUYS! What do we do, Bucky, WHAT DO WE DO?!? 1
26CornerBlitz Posted September 8, 2018 Author Posted September 8, 2018 7 minutes ago, MJS said: Eric Wood told a story on OBL yesterday about how a few years ago they had a similar preseason with the offensive line. Everyone dumped on them and the narrative all around the league was about how bad the oline in Buffalo was. Then they went on to lead the league in rushing and gave up among the fewest sacks in the NFL. His point was that preseason can be very different from the regular season. We may have a bad oline or may not, but it has nothing to do with how they performed in the preseason. It certainly isn't based just on the preseason as many predicted the OL would struggle this season with the talent (or lack thereof) on hand after the offseason departures.
1st Ammendment NoMas Posted September 8, 2018 Posted September 8, 2018 By tomorrow the world will know. I'm hoping the scheme can minimize the damage. With all the new bull **** rules we may pick up a few "roughing" penalties. I think we all hope for the best and plan for the worst. It will be interesting to see if any of the vet OL out there have been contacted. If Ducasse can hold up and Miller can minimize the penalties we may survive. I think Nate is better than what the experts give him credit for. Not top 15 but not bottom 5 either. He will be an upgrade over Tyrod. It will be interesting to see how TT does with all those weapons in CLE. TT. 16-31 211 yds 1TD 6 Rushes for 41. 2 sacks NP 21-28 284 2TDs 1 INT 2 rushes for 7 yds. 4 sacks 2
thurst44 Posted September 8, 2018 Posted September 8, 2018 8 minutes ago, MJS said: Eric Wood told a story on OBL yesterday about how a few years ago they had a similar preseason with the offensive line. Everyone dumped on them and the narrative all around the league was about how bad the oline in Buffalo was. Then they went on to lead the league in rushing and gave up among the fewest sacks in the NFL. His point was that preseason can be very different from the regular season. We may have a bad oline or may not, but it has nothing to do with how they performed in the preseason. Exactly. Logic says the line will be bad, but how often does football follow logic. Look at last year to see how predictably units play week-to-week. After the 3-game-dive in the middle of the season, there was no reason to think our line could block anyone or our defense had a clue how to tackle, then the following week in KC, they played well. Our line (as well as other teams' lines) has been deemed "terrible" many times in the past only to take the field and do just fine. The opposite is true as well. We'll get the first glimpse tomorrow. Hopefully, we'll all be pleasantly surprised, even if we have no reason to expect that.
LeGOATski Posted September 8, 2018 Posted September 8, 2018 Two tight ends and a full back all day... I see you, Greg Roman 1
billspro Posted September 8, 2018 Posted September 8, 2018 15 minutes ago, MJS said: Eric Wood told a story on OBL yesterday about how a few years ago they had a similar preseason with the offensive line. Everyone dumped on them and the narrative all around the league was about how bad the oline in Buffalo was. Then they went on to lead the league in rushing and gave up among the fewest sacks in the NFL. His point was that preseason can be very different from the regular season. We may have a bad oline or may not, but it has nothing to do with how they performed in the preseason. I remember this, they were brutal last preseason too. I’m interested to see how they play against Baltimore. Peterman gets the ball pit quick so I wouldn’t be surprised if the line held up.
Coach Tuesday Posted September 8, 2018 Posted September 8, 2018 24 minutes ago, MJS said: Eric Wood told a story on OBL yesterday about how a few years ago they had a similar preseason with the offensive line. Everyone dumped on them and the narrative all around the league was about how bad the oline in Buffalo was. Then they went on to lead the league in rushing and gave up among the fewest sacks in the NFL. His point was that preseason can be very different from the regular season. We may have a bad oline or may not, but it has nothing to do with how they performed in the preseason. It’s possible the Bengals did them a huge favor. It’s our only hope.
aristocrat Posted September 8, 2018 Posted September 8, 2018 Not every team has a great defense so there will be weeks we dominate
Recommended Posts