26CornerBlitz Posted September 7, 2018 Posted September 7, 2018 Just now, Mr. WEO said: No, his teammates said it. None of their business.
Mr. WEO Posted September 7, 2018 Posted September 7, 2018 1 minute ago, 26CornerBlitz said: None of their business. You're veering into Sky Diver territory with this reasoning...lol!
26CornerBlitz Posted September 7, 2018 Posted September 7, 2018 Just now, Mr. WEO said: You're veering into Sky Diver territory with this reasoning...lol! Funny you would say that with your favorite targets like Shady McCoy that you bring up in unrelated threads.
Mr. WEO Posted September 7, 2018 Posted September 7, 2018 (edited) Just now, 26CornerBlitz said: Funny you would say that with your favorite targets like Shady McCoy that you bring up in unrelated threads. huh? like you just did? Edited September 7, 2018 by Mr. WEO
26CornerBlitz Posted September 7, 2018 Posted September 7, 2018 Just now, Mr. WEO said: huh? like you just did? Pointing out your ridiculous incessant targeting like the Alabama fan you just mentioned.
GETTOTHE50 Posted September 7, 2018 Posted September 7, 2018 50 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said: Not even rando's like Alvin Kamala or Kareem Hunt? I think those two listed out of the many that have been drafted are more the exception to the rule than not. Me, personally, I rather pay for a sure thing and address other needs through the draft, like the offensive line, where a guard can step in immediately and perform admirably.
Mr. WEO Posted September 7, 2018 Posted September 7, 2018 Just now, 26CornerBlitz said: Pointing out your ridiculous incessant targeting like the Alabama fan you just mentioned. I was more pointing out the penchant for continuing to flail away in the face of the obvious. But, ok, the players being paved that he hasn't shown up yet has nothing to do with the players being peaved. It's only about money, which players can never argue otherwise. 2 minutes ago, GETTOTHE50 said: I think those two listed out of the many that have been drafted are more the exception to the rule than not. Me, personally, I rather pay for a sure thing and address other needs through the draft, like the offensive line, where a guard can step in immediately and perform admirably. They were 2 in the same draft.
26CornerBlitz Posted September 7, 2018 Posted September 7, 2018 Just now, Mr. WEO said: I was more pointing out the penchant for continuing to flail away in the face of the obvious. But, ok, the players being paved that he hasn't shown up yet has nothing to do with the players being peaved. It's only about money, which players can never argue otherwise. Flail away. You are a funny guy. They can be peaved all they want, but the should have shut up about it. Not their business.
Mr. WEO Posted September 7, 2018 Posted September 7, 2018 11 minutes ago, GETTOTHE50 said: I think those two listed out of the many that have been drafted are more the exception to the rule than not. Me, personally, I rather pay for a sure thing and address other needs through the draft, like the offensive line, where a guard can step in immediately and perform admirably. And what about David johnson? Devontae Freeman? (4th) 8 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said: Flail away. You are a funny guy. They can be peaved all they want, but the should have shut up about it. Not their business. They should not disagree with you on this topic?
Freddie's Dead Posted September 7, 2018 Posted September 7, 2018 The juxtaposition of Bell and Mack is fascinating. Mack was UNDER CONTRACT, didn't show up, no hatred directed toward him at all. Bell, NOT UNDER CONTRACT, doesn't want to play for the tag, will likely show up week 10, is getting crap from all angles.
26CornerBlitz Posted September 7, 2018 Posted September 7, 2018 4 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said: And what about David johnson? Devontae Freeman? (4th) They should not disagree with you on this topic? The topic is the topic, it doesn't make the players who complained right.
YoloinOhio Posted September 7, 2018 Author Posted September 7, 2018 1 minute ago, Freddie's Dead said: The juxtaposition of Bell and Mack is fascinating. Mack was UNDER CONTRACT, didn't show up, no hatred directed toward him at all. Bell, NOT UNDER CONTRACT, doesn't want to play for the tag, will likely show up week 10, is getting crap from all angles. Right or wrong, I think everyone pretty much blames Gruden for the Mack situation 1
Freddie's Dead Posted September 7, 2018 Posted September 7, 2018 Just now, YoloinOhio said: Right or wrong, I think everyone pretty much blames Gruden for the Mack situation Yet the Squeelers magically escape blame and make Bell the villain.
Mr. WEO Posted September 7, 2018 Posted September 7, 2018 Just now, YoloinOhio said: Right or wrong, I think everyone pretty much blames Gruden for the Mack situation Bell has done this repeatedly. What was Gruen supposed to do--donate his salary to cover Mack's guarantee?
Boatdrinks Posted September 7, 2018 Posted September 7, 2018 4 minutes ago, Freddie's Dead said: The juxtaposition of Bell and Mack is fascinating. Mack was UNDER CONTRACT, didn't show up, no hatred directed toward him at all. Bell, NOT UNDER CONTRACT, doesn't want to play for the tag, will likely show up week 10, is getting crap from all angles. One team is serious about winning another Super Bowl. The other team is well, the Raiders.
Wily Dog Posted September 7, 2018 Posted September 7, 2018 Bell is an unique back and deserved to be paid for his uniqueness the first time his contract was up. He is both a runner and receiver and the Steelers opted to try to pay him for just running . They were being disingenuous and Bell had to sign the offer and the "Stillers" got another year out of Bell. The Team knows that if he signs with them this year that they can overwork to the point that next year he will have very little value. that said , i wouldn't bet on the Steelers this year because of the dimension on the team. There will be players who will side with Bell .
Boatdrinks Posted September 7, 2018 Posted September 7, 2018 17 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said: Flail away. You are a funny guy. They can be peaved all they want, but the should have shut up about it. Not their business. I found it refreshing to hear how the players really felt about this, instead of going right to the cliche book. Right or wrong, it was interesting.
26CornerBlitz Posted September 7, 2018 Posted September 7, 2018 Just now, Boatdrinks said: I found it refreshing to hear how the players really felt about this, instead of going right to the cliche book. Right or wrong, it was interesting. Granted.
Wily Dog Posted September 7, 2018 Posted September 7, 2018 (edited) The Steelers will try to blame Tomlin for their screw up.when it is all said and done. Edited September 7, 2018 by Wily Dog sp
The_Dude Posted September 7, 2018 Posted September 7, 2018 (edited) 59 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said: No one says that he isn't within his rights. But this thread exists because his teammates, this time, have taken issue with his failure to play with them. I don't know why you keep denying this is an issue other than money when they are making to very clear for you. The amount the Steelers won't pay him. Are you talking trade compensation or salary? Edited September 7, 2018 by The_Dude
Recommended Posts