Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

This is playing out perfectly for Bell.  Show up week 10, get your year of service, then become a FA.  No way the Steelers tag him again.  BTW, if he doesn't show up, the Steelers automatically have him tagged next year at no increase to them.  He will show in week 10.

Posted
7 minutes ago, Freddie's Dead said:

This is playing out perfectly for Bell.  Show up week 10, get your year of service, then become a FA.  No way the Steelers tag him again.  BTW, if he doesn't show up, the Steelers automatically have him tagged next year at no increase to them.  He will show in week 10.

 

If he doesn't report this year, they may also just choose to not tag him this offseason and say good riddance since both sides seem more than satisfied with a divorce.

Posted
7 minutes ago, Freddie's Dead said:

This is playing out perfectly for Bell.  Show up week 10, get your year of service, then become a FA.  No way the Steelers tag him again.  BTW, if he doesn't show up, the Steelers automatically have him tagged next year at no increase to them.  He will show in week 10.

 

What if they cut him in week 9?  Take the cap hit.  He's screwed a bit more.

 

But he really just screwed himself with this holdout.  He's proving to the next team he'll take less money than the Steelers already tried to give him---and that he's worth less than they were going to pay him (given his age and the the status of his replacement).

 

Just dumb.

Posted
10 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said:

 

What if they cut him in week 9?  Take the cap hit.  He's screwed a bit more.

 

But he really just screwed himself with this holdout.  He's proving to the next team he'll take less money than the Steelers already tried to give him---and that he's worth less than they were going to pay him (given his age and the the status of his replacement).

 

Just dumb.

 

So he should have risked injury to play under the tag for the 2nd year in a row?  How did that work for Earl Thomas?

Posted (edited)
7 hours ago, Freddie's Dead said:

 

So he should have risked injury to play under the tag for the 2nd year in a row?  How did that work for Earl Thomas?

tell him to go cry to the NFLPA as they negotiated and players ratified the cba that expressly lays out how and when franchise tags and transition tags can be used.

 

 

Bell is clearly a high roller taking these chances.

Edited by cba fan
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
10 hours ago, Freddie's Dead said:

 

So he should have risked injury to play under the tag for the 2nd year in a row?  How did that work for Earl Thomas?

 

Oh no he may make a few less million. Let me wipe this tear from my eye.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
9 hours ago, cba fan said:

tell him to go cry to the NFLPA as they negotiated and players ratified the cba that expressly lays out how and when franchise tags and transition tags can be used.

 

 

Bell is clearly a high roller taking these chances.

 

Lickspittle!  Bureaucrat!

Posted
19 hours ago, YoloinOhio said:

I think a lot of it is their OL tbh

 

Bell is clearly very talented, but a swiss cheese line would not allow him to hesitate in the backfield as much as he does.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
19 hours ago, Mr. WEO said:

 

What if they cut him in week 9?  Take the cap hit.  He's screwed a bit more.

 

But he really just screwed himself with this holdout.  He's proving to the next team he'll take less money than the Steelers already tried to give him---and that he's worth less than they were going to pay him (given his age and the the status of his replacement).

 

Just dumb.

Sean Gilbert begs to differ. 

Posted
On ‎11‎/‎2‎/‎2018 at 2:57 PM, dave mcbride said:

Sean Gilbert begs to differ. 

 

Why?

 

When he was tagged a second time, he was allowed to take it to arbitration.  Players now can be tagged 3 times. 

 

Bell will never get a contract for more than the one the Steelers offered him.  Why would any team pay more for a RB (who's not Todd Gurley).

×
×
  • Create New...