YoloinOhio Posted September 5, 2018 Posted September 5, 2018 (edited) Are any of these guys going to block for Le'Veon when he shows up? Edited November 1, 2018 by YoloinOhio
YoloinOhio Posted September 5, 2018 Author Posted September 5, 2018 steelers OL is going to ball out for Conner
ProcessAccepted Posted September 5, 2018 Posted September 5, 2018 They want to win so they'll do what they have to do. I think it's more a question of how long the Steeler organization puts up with it. 1
KGun12TD Posted September 5, 2018 Posted September 5, 2018 Who cares? Is he a Bills? No? Who cares. Their problem.
Royale with Cheese Posted September 5, 2018 Posted September 5, 2018 I’m actually happy they spoke up. 2
Nick the Greek Posted September 5, 2018 Posted September 5, 2018 (edited) Pay the man. At the end of the day it’s a business, so you better make as much money as you can. Edited September 5, 2018 by Idandria 1 1
teef Posted September 5, 2018 Posted September 5, 2018 looks like you can't unring that bell! right guys?! right?! 3 1
Rico Posted September 5, 2018 Posted September 5, 2018 3 minutes ago, KGun12TD said: Who cares? Is he a Bills? No? Who cares. Their problem. Just me, but I always appreciate reading bad news when it comes to the Steelers. 7 2
26CornerBlitz Posted September 5, 2018 Posted September 5, 2018 Just now, Idandria said: Pay the man. At the end of the day it’s a business, so you better make as much money as you can. Not a hold out since he's not under contract. It's his career and business decision. 1
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted September 5, 2018 Posted September 5, 2018 1 minute ago, Rico said: Just me, but I always appreciate reading bad news when it comes to the Steelers. Not just you. I DESPISE Schittsburgh and their fans. 1
Royale with Cheese Posted September 5, 2018 Posted September 5, 2018 3 minutes ago, teef said: looks like you can't unring that bell! right guys?! right?! No...no you can’t. You are right like wings with ranch.
ColoradoBills Posted September 5, 2018 Posted September 5, 2018 4 minutes ago, Rico said: Just me, but I always appreciate reading bad news when it comes to the Steelers. Go Browns!
teef Posted September 5, 2018 Posted September 5, 2018 1 minute ago, Royale with Cheese said: No...no you can’t. You are right like wings with ranch. why does ranch go so well with chicken fingers, but not wings. have you ever thought of that? !@#$ing have you?! 2
Royale with Cheese Posted September 5, 2018 Posted September 5, 2018 Just now, teef said: why does ranch go so well with chicken fingers, but not wings. have you ever thought of that? !@#$ing have you?! I think about it at least 2.5 times a week. 2
KD in CA Posted September 5, 2018 Posted September 5, 2018 7 minutes ago, Idandria said: Pay the man. At the end of the day it’s a business, so you better make as much money as you can. I was under the impression they've been trying to pay him $70 million dollars. 3
teef Posted September 5, 2018 Posted September 5, 2018 1 minute ago, Royale with Cheese said: I think about it at least 2.5 times a week. that's reasonable. 1
Thurman#1 Posted September 5, 2018 Posted September 5, 2018 (edited) 19 minutes ago, Idandria said: Pay the man. At the end of the day it’s a business, so you better make as much money as you can. 10 minutes ago, KD in CA said: I was under the impression they've been trying to pay him $70 million dollars. Yeah, but he believes he'll get more. Nothing wrong with that. And nothing wrong with the Steelers not wanting to pay him more either ... or the players reacting angrily for that matter. It's all a part of today's game, an interesting situation. And by the way, this is a small point, but worth making ... they aren't trying to pay him $70 million. They're trying to give him a contract which would pay him $70 million if he stays on the team for the duration of the contract. I don't think the details are out there yet on how much he would make if he got a career-ending injury after one year, or if he wore out in two years and was cut. The exact details of contracts are very important, making contracts much more or less inviting than just the final figure. We've all seen back-loaded contract offers like SF's offer for Nate Clements where the final figure was huge but the last year or two had him receiving a large percentage of that big figure. He had never been intended to receive that whole figure and sure enough was cut just before those huge numbers kicked in. Is the Bell contract like that? I have no idea, but we don't know, do we? Edited September 5, 2018 by Thurman#1 2
Recommended Posts