Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 hours ago, PetermanThrew5Picks said:

NO BECAUSE HE THROWS A STATISTICALLY IMPROBABLE NUMBER OF PICKS WITH AN EVEN CRAPPIER OFFENSE. HOW ABOUT WR BRING BACK JEFF TUEL. TOTAL PROCESS PLAYER RIGHT???

I could coordinate against Peterman. They want the Bills to start him because he David fales.. Bills version

Picks

I mean Levi Brown and Jeff TUEL are process players.. and they threw less picks. BRING THEM BACK

 

I'm not sure what you do for a living, but imagine if your entire career was judged by your first 30 minutes on the job.

 

Doesn't seem fair, does it?  Or smart.

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted
1 hour ago, pop gun said:

Or maybe the online looked better in front of him because he gets rid of the ball quick.

 

Or he wasn't facing any team's starting front 7 except for a sliver of preseason game 1.

Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, PetermanThrew5Picks said:

NO BECAUSE HE THROWS A STATISTICALLY IMPROBABLE NUMBER OF PICKS WITH AN EVEN CRAPPIER OFFENSE. HOW ABOUT WR BRING BACK JEFF TUEL. TOTAL PROCESS PLAYER RIGHT???

I could coordinate against Peterman. They want the Bills to start him because he David fales.. Bills version

Picks

I mean Levi Brown and Jeff TUEL are process players.. and they threw less picks. BRING THEM BACK

 

Give the kid a shot at redemption.  

 

Thats what the Bills FO is doing 

 

If you don’t like it ......  that's on you

 

 

Edited by ShadyBillsFan
Inappropriate (nonverbal) language
Posted
5 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said:

 

Or he wasn't facing any team's starting front 7 except for a sliver of preseason game 1.

Pay attention because that's what was said about the online looking good only against Carolina with Peterman under center. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, pop gun said:

Pay attention because that's what was said about the online looking good only against Carolina with Peterman under center. 

 

Not really. 

Posted
7 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said:

 

Or he wasn't facing any team's starting front 7 except for a sliver of preseason game 1.

 

He cant control who he goes up against. He was by the far the best QB during the preseason.

Posted
Just now, Bangarang said:

 

He cant control who he goes up against. He was by the far the best QB during the preseason.

 

 

That misses the point that he was not challenged in the was JA was.  So he wasn't undergoing the same evaluation process.  He played 2 varsity series all preseason and hten he coasted the rest of the way against scrubs exclusively.  In the only meaningful preseason  game (week 3) they wouldn't let him into the huddle until the Bengals sat their starters.  Then he came in and Scrimmaged with the 2-3-4s and padded his stats.  He's faced no pressure since last season, when that pressure resulted in 5 picks.

 

My guess is that, if he had to play that first half against the Bengals starters, hw would not be the Bills starter coming this Sunday. 

Posted
22 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said:

 

 

That misses the point that he was not challenged in the was JA was.  So he wasn't undergoing the same evaluation process.  He played 2 varsity series all preseason and hten he coasted the rest of the way against scrubs exclusively.  In the only meaningful preseason  game (week 3) they wouldn't let him into the huddle until the Bengals sat their starters.  Then he came in and Scrimmaged with the 2-3-4s and padded his stats.  He's faced no pressure since last season, when that pressure resulted in 5 picks.

 

My guess is that, if he had to play that first half against the Bengals starters, hw would not be the Bills starter coming this Sunday. 

 

What do you mean he wasn’t challenged the same way Allen was or didn’t go under the same evaluation process? That literally makes no sense.

 

Are you just sad Allen didn’t come out and clearly win the competition? He will get his shot eventually.

 

Allen also went up against backups just like Peterman did and still wasn’t able to consistently look as good or pad his stats like you’re bashing Peterman for. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
5 hours ago, PetermanThrew5Picks said:

A username that had a stat? Lmao.

 

I'm blackout rn so I'll apologize tomorrow. But Peterman threw 5 picks in one half. It Happened.. saying otherwise is being a flat earther you branwashed idiot

I'm a pissed off bills fan because we have pick6 Pete. Until he stops throwing interceptions every average 5 drop backs.. he's probably the best quarterback we have. And that's why I miss Tyrod lol. He averaged a lot less picks per snap. But nope. Not a bills fan you got me. I haven't bought the process because we are horrible.

 

Btw you should be a guest on our podcast seriously. We need Peterman defenders to laugh at

 

You suck fridge. Everybody says you're overrated

 

Fridge please give me an argument that is solid and doesn't say the friggin process. And we can. Proceed to civilized conversation. Because if pick 6 Pete is the process.. we're going to have a bad time

 

Good luck with your podcast.

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Bangarang said:

 

What do you mean he wasn’t challenged the same way Allen was or didn’t go under the same evaluation process? That literally makes no sense.

 

Are you just sad Allen didn’t come out and clearly win the competition? He will get his shot eventually.

 

Allen also went up against backups just like Peterman did and still wasn’t able to consistently look as good or pad his stats like you’re bashing Peterman for. 

Bang,     Remember when EJ only got to practice with the 3's and it was called a fair competition?   

 

I do.  

(yes there is sarcasm there and not directed at you) 

 

-----------------------------

imo from what I have witnessed 

McDermott isn't one to play a rookie QB unless he's sure (or has outside pressure - more than that of an OC) 

Josh started out as the 3 as the FO intended and had to clearly earn the start.

He got the start in week 3 of the PS and while he played admirable, but he under performed.

 

I will apologize in advance if I have the wronging wrong 

and Josh admitted that he wasn't quite ready for what he faced in that  semi-real NFL game. 

 

 

Edited by ShadyBillsFan
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, fridge said:

 

Good luck with your podcast.

Touche. I was blackout drunk. Sorry. Peterman threw 5 picks tho. That's all the name means. Trust me I'll change it to PetermanThrew5TDs when it happens lol

 

I seriously wanna have a crappy Peterman debate episode Stephen A Smith style. And I'll be civilized lol, ask Buffaloenthusiast. He's on the show more than anyone and we always start arguing Peterman

Edited by PetermanThrew5Picks
Posted
1 minute ago, PetermanThrew5Picks said:

Touche. I was blackout drunk. Sorry. Peterman threw 5 picks tho. That's all the name means. Trust me I'll change it to PetermanThrew5TDs when it happens lol

 

Maybe you should reserve PetermanThrewUp.  :unsure:

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted

I don't think Peterman is nearly as bad as he is perceived to be.  He would probably have a W under his belt if he completed the Indy snow game.  He was throwing well in that game, much better than the Indy QB...and had the Bills up 7-0.  

This Ravens game will be tough.  I hope the coaching staff keeps it simple and Nate can get through the game without having it turn into a nightmare.  If he can manage the game, keep the chains moving, stay out of trouble, that will go a long way towards confidence.   Because of his past, The Ravens will be looking to jump every out route.  Those DB's are going to try and feed off the LA Chargers film.  Maybe our OC can dial up some plays where Peterman can burn the DB's, knowing they will be looking to jump up.  Maybe some hitch and go routes or something...

Posted
Just now, BeefCurtns said:

Except Fitz was able to scramble. Not sure If Peterman could move as well.

 

He does a surprisingly good job with his legs from time to time.

×
×
  • Create New...