Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
21 minutes ago, Kelly the Dog said:

Good point. 

 

I think we should sign one guy to a nine million dollar contract. Or else nine million guys to a one dollar contract and let them fight it out. Or else something somewhere in between. 

 

Oh NO! I think you just found your way into the “non-football people” list! 

 

Unless there’s something they feel strongly about, they roll it over. 

Posted

Perhaps a trade, but more likely they'll sit on it; wait to see if they want to use any of it on extensions for Groy, Benjamin, or Davis.

 

They may also choose to carry a good amount of it over to 2019, when they're projected to be among the league leaders in cap space.

Posted
4 minutes ago, thebandit27 said:

Perhaps a trade, but more likely they'll sit on it; wait to see if they want to use any of it on extensions for Groy, Benjamin, or Davis.

 

They may also choose to carry a good amount of it over to 2019, when they're projected to be among the league leaders in cap space.

Heard this a couple times. Why do we want to roll it over if we already have plenty of cap?    Not opposed to the idea just confused

Posted
3 minutes ago, YattaOkasan said:

Heard this a couple times. Why do we want to roll it over if we already have plenty of cap?    Not opposed to the idea just confused

I really dont like the word tank.....but Im thinking they might want to go with what they have because they dont see anyone significantly better at this point

Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, YattaOkasan said:

Heard this a couple times. Why do we want to roll it over if we already have plenty of cap?    Not opposed to the idea just confused

 

More cap in more meaningful season > less cap in the year we get to watch NP.

Edited by GoodHands15
Posted
10 minutes ago, thebandit27 said:

Perhaps a trade, but more likely they'll sit on it; wait to see if they want to use any of it on extensions for Groy, Benjamin, or Davis.

 

They may also choose to carry a good amount of it over to 2019, when they're projected to be among the league leaders in cap space.

 

You think they would have their minds made up about Groy.

If they want him next year I like the idea of locking him up instead of letting him go to market.

Posted (edited)
57 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said:

Buddy just woke up with that one!

Please, no...I don't think I can bear another of Cornpone's hayseed tinged player evaluations.

Edited by Ridgewaycynic2013
Posted
2 minutes ago, ColoradoBills said:

 

You think they would have their minds made up about Groy.

If they want him next year I like the idea of locking him up instead of letting him go to market.

Why? He's just not very good, even as a backup. He can play all 3 interior positions, but even while OL talent is in short supply he could easily be replaced.

Posted

roll it over to 2019. we need an infusion of free agent talent.

 

no one on current roster who is a 2019 free agent  worth extending this season with the exception on kelvin Benjamin and I would rather wait on him.

Posted
8 minutes ago, GreggTX said:

Why? He's just not very good, even as a backup. He can play all 3 interior positions, but even while OL talent is in short supply he could easily be replaced.

 

That's why I said if they want him back.  If they don't Bills got these guys signed for next year.

Sure hope there are enough 2019 UFAs wanting to come to Buffalo.

 

Dawkins

McDermott

 

Ducasse

Teller

 

Bodine

Posted
21 minutes ago, John from Riverside said:

I really dont like the word tank.....but Im thinking they might want to go with what they have because they dont see anyone significantly better at this point

 

20 minutes ago, GoodHands15 said:

 

More cap in more meaningful season > less cap in the year we get to watch NP.

After last year I still get the yearn to be competitive from these guys. I think they will look to make a move if it’s there. I don’t really think there is a great move out there anyway though. 

Posted
45 minutes ago, YattaOkasan said:

Heard this a couple times. Why do we want to roll it over if we already have plenty of cap?    Not opposed to the idea just confused

 

Not sure to be honest--unless they plan to make a big push for some offensive linemen and/or pass rushers

Posted
5 minutes ago, thebandit27 said:

 

Not sure to be honest--unless they plan to make a big push for some offensive linemen and/or pass rushers

I'd be curious to the ROI for these teams. Does using that $9mm really generate a positive effect in net?  Of course, it depends on how they spend it; signing a Doug Flutie type vs a flyer on someone else that never panned out.

 

The NFL is still a business

Posted
1 hour ago, YattaOkasan said:

Heard this a couple times. Why do we want to roll it over if we already have plenty of cap?    Not opposed to the idea just confused

Possibly better options to spend it on.

×
×
  • Create New...