3rdnlng Posted August 31, 2018 Share Posted August 31, 2018 1 minute ago, Koko78 said: Well, gator just admitted that they have nothing without Trump testifying. Everything goes when #resisting the actual literal super mecha-Hitler. Of course that whole probable cause/due process/bill of rights nonsense doesn't apply. Why? Making him look stupid relieves boredom. Boyst has a point. Posting in one of Gleeful Gator's threads is sort of silly, right Boyst? On the other hand, mocking the moron who couldn't figure out how many weeks in a year is similar to watching the fourth quarter of the 4th preseason game. Not very important, but once in a blue moon can be satisfying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted August 31, 2018 Share Posted August 31, 2018 30 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: Boyst has a point. Posting in one of Gleeful Gator's threads is sort of silly, right Boyst? On the other hand, mocking the moron who couldn't figure out how many weeks in a year is similar to watching the fourth quarter of the 4th preseason game. Not very important, but once in a blue moon can be satisfying. No. Not responding (directly) is MUCH more satisfying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
njbuff Posted August 31, 2018 Share Posted August 31, 2018 (edited) Hey look, another day, another Trump-hating thread started by Fib. What a shock. That noose is starting to tighten on your beloved Democratic Party, isn't it? Don't let Bruce Ohr answer any more questions, because he is going to fold like a dollar bill. Edited August 31, 2018 by njbuff Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keepthefaith Posted August 31, 2018 Share Posted August 31, 2018 16 minutes ago, njbuff said: Hey look, another day, another Trump-hating thread started by Fib. What a shock. That noose is starting to tighten on your beloved Democratic Party, isn't it? Don't like Bruce Ohr answer any more questions, because he is going to fold like a dollar bill. Must be a bonus paid for starting threads. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
njbuff Posted August 31, 2018 Share Posted August 31, 2018 4 minutes ago, keepthefaith said: Must be a bonus paid for starting threads. What's the cost for starting FAILING threads? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted September 1, 2018 Share Posted September 1, 2018 Should Obama have to testify under oath about his knowledge of Hiliary Clinton's unsecured email server? Or his involvement in the state sanctioned surveillance of political opposition? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted September 1, 2018 Author Share Posted September 1, 2018 17 hours ago, Doc said: Yeah, no. Going on a fishing expedition so you can nail him for something completely unrelated isn't "substance" (and that was my problem with the Whitewater investigation). Let him find something, anything, showing there was collusion and then he should have to talk. Until then...crickets. Hillary testified, they didn't find anything. Trump is scared for a reason. Mueller has found plenty already, but Trump needs to talk. And his own hand picked judges shouldn't be able to say he doesn't have to. 10 hours ago, /dev/null said: Should Obama have to testify under oath about his knowledge of Hiliary Clinton's unsecured email server? Or his involvement in the state sanctioned surveillance of political opposition? What do you think? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted September 1, 2018 Share Posted September 1, 2018 5 hours ago, Tiberius said: What do you think? I asked you first Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted September 1, 2018 Share Posted September 1, 2018 4 minutes ago, /dev/null said: I asked you first You asked if he thinks? You're an idiot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted September 1, 2018 Share Posted September 1, 2018 22 hours ago, njbuff said: What's the cost for starting FAILING threads? Our sanity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted September 1, 2018 Share Posted September 1, 2018 17 minutes ago, Chef Jim said: Our sanity. Most of us lost that years ago 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted September 2, 2018 Author Share Posted September 2, 2018 18 hours ago, /dev/null said: I asked you first Those are not even close to the same things, so no. Stupid comparison on your part. Do do you think Obama should have to testify? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted September 2, 2018 Share Posted September 2, 2018 2 hours ago, Tiberius said: Those are not even close to the same things, so no. Stupid comparison on your part. Do do you think Obama should have to testify? How are they not the same thing? Both are suspected to be complicit in some form of malfeasance. So why should one be compelled to testify under oath but the other exempt? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted September 2, 2018 Author Share Posted September 2, 2018 11 minutes ago, /dev/null said: How are they not the same thing? Both are suspected to be complicit in some form of malfeasance. So why should one be compelled to testify under oath but the other exempt? So you agree with me Trump should testify. I don't agree Obama should of had to, totally different situation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keukasmallies Posted September 2, 2018 Share Posted September 2, 2018 (edited) Why bother? Given the OP's proclivity to focus only on his own points of view and to ignore widely accepted facts; he most assuredly wouldn't accept anything Trump said. OK, most of us wouldn't either, but OP would just drag out his disdain to a degree even he hasn't yet approached. Edited September 2, 2018 by Keukasmallies 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
njbuff Posted September 2, 2018 Share Posted September 2, 2018 22 minutes ago, /dev/null said: How are they not the same thing? Both are suspected to be complicit in some form of malfeasance. So why should one be compelled to testify under oath but the other exempt? No, you forgot that Obama's Presidency was scandal free. How dare you compare The Golden Child to a dirtbag like Trump. How dare you. ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted September 3, 2018 Author Share Posted September 3, 2018 22 hours ago, /dev/null said: How are they not the same thing? Both are suspected to be complicit in some form of malfeasance. So why should one be compelled to testify under oath but the other exempt? Because Obama had nothing to do with the email thing. Right? Trump should testify because cause he is directly connected to his campaign which probably conspired with the Russians. He is a central figure in the act (Russia, if you are listening...) and the cover up. You seriously can't see the difference? Lol, really? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Callahan Posted September 3, 2018 Share Posted September 3, 2018 LOL for what exactly? what charge? 8 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Because Obama had nothing to do with the email thing. Right? Trump should testify because cause he is directly connected to his campaign which probably conspired with the Russians. He is a central figure in the act (Russia, if you are listening...) and the cover up. You seriously can't see the difference? Lol, really? So you think he should testify, cause you believe he probably conspired. based on no evidence. lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted September 3, 2018 Author Share Posted September 3, 2018 2 minutes ago, Chris farley said: LOL for what exactly? what charge? So you think he should testify, cause you believe he probably conspired. based on no evidence. lol But there is evidence. Have you had your head in the sand? You can't state any evidence? Why are you posting here if you are completely ignorant of any facts? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Callahan Posted September 3, 2018 Share Posted September 3, 2018 LOL. what evidence? I am well aware of the details. you seem to have went from emotional rant, to ad hominem responses. So instead of trying to insult, articulate your argument or present said Evidence. if possible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts