Tiberius Posted September 3, 2018 Author Share Posted September 3, 2018 8 minutes ago, Chris farley said: LOL. what evidence? I am well aware of the details. you seem to have went from emotional rant, to ad hominem responses. So instead of trying to insult, articulate your argument or present said Evidence. if possible. I won't tell you about the evidence, because you should know about it already. I will just insult your ignorance when you say there is no evidence. Do some reading, you can learn something, unless, of course, you are afraid to learn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
outsidethebox Posted September 3, 2018 Share Posted September 3, 2018 53 minutes ago, Tiberius said: I won't tell you about the evidence, because you should know about it already. I will just insult your ignorance when you say there is no evidence. Do some reading, you can learn something, unless, of course, you are afraid to learn. Feelings, woah woah woah feelings...... 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keukasmallies Posted September 3, 2018 Share Posted September 3, 2018 1 hour ago, Tiberius said: I won't tell you about the evidence, because you should know about it already. I will just insult your ignorance when you say there is no evidence. Do some reading, you can learn something, unless, of course, you are afraid to learn. _____________________________________ This from Captain Imperious. What a joke, this guy is at least as bad as Trump with his major in obfuscation, innuendo and plain ignorance. Finally, he lays on us that he is the keeper of all knowledge, a Delphic syndrome if ever there was one. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Callahan Posted September 3, 2018 Share Posted September 3, 2018 1 hour ago, Tiberius said: I won't tell you about the evidence, because you should know about it already. I will just insult your ignorance when you say there is no evidence. Do some reading, you can learn something, unless, of course, you are afraid to learn. lol Why is it, Every message board has at least one "you" on it. So right of the bat, if we have evidence for what you state. ONLY Mueller would know. Not you. its why you cant provide said evidence, only Mueller knows. and have no worries. Mueller will get to the bottom of it. Just remember how good of a job he did with the 9/11 commission. He verified everything was on the up and up. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted September 3, 2018 Author Share Posted September 3, 2018 1 hour ago, Tiberius said: I won't tell you about the evidence, because you should know about it already. I will just insult your ignorance when you say there is no evidence. Do some reading, you can learn something, unless, of course, you are afraid to learn. _____________________________________ This from Captain Imperious. What a joke, this guy is at least as bad as Trump with his major in obfuscation, innuendo and plain ignorance. Finally, he lays on us that he is the keeper of all knowledge, a Delphic syndrome if ever there was one. LOL, I'm still right! lol Why is it, Every message board has at least one "you" on it. So right of the bat, if we have evidence for what you state. ONLY Mueller would know. Not you. its why you cant provide said evidence, only Mueller knows. and have no worries. Mueller will get to the bottom of it. Just remember how good of a job he did with the 9/11 commission. He verified everything was on the up and up. Trump should have to testify. He is at the center of this major investigation over a foreign power interfering in our elections and if our commander in chief knows anything, he should let us know. You can moan and complain all you want, it don't change what's right 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted September 4, 2018 Author Share Posted September 4, 2018 Quote The months-long dance between President Trump’s lawyers and Robert Mueller over a voluntary presidential interview has yet to bear fruit, raising the question of whether the special counsel will subpoena the president to testify as part of his Russia probe. Those who know Mueller professionally say he would not hesitate to compel Trump to testify under oath before a grand jury if he considered it critical that his investigation include testimony from the commander in chief. Still, such a move would carry risks for both sides, agitating tensions between the White House and the special counsel’s office and potentially triggering a legal battle that could lead all the way to the Supreme Court. http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/404598-will-mueller-subpoena-trump-move-carries-risks-for-both-sides Do it! I mean just for the historical record. Future generations should get to see just how foolish this jerk is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted September 5, 2018 Author Share Posted September 5, 2018 Mueller willing to allow written responses from president. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/mueller-tells-trumps-legal-team-that-he-will-accept-written-answers-on-campaign-questions/2018/09/04/63673368-b090-11e8-aed9-001309990777_story.html?utm_term=.b7cbd1657c20 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snafu Posted September 5, 2018 Share Posted September 5, 2018 58 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Mueller willing to allow written responses from president. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/mueller-tells-trumps-legal-team-that-he-will-accept-written-answers-on-campaign-questions/2018/09/04/63673368-b090-11e8-aed9-001309990777_story.html?utm_term=.b7cbd1657c20 Wait, wut? Thats not anything like testifying under oath. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted September 5, 2018 Author Share Posted September 5, 2018 5 minutes ago, snafu said: Wait, wut? Thats not anything like testifying under oath. I guess they would be official answers, sworn to be truthful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snafu Posted September 5, 2018 Share Posted September 5, 2018 13 minutes ago, Tiberius said: I guess they would be official answers, sworn to be truthful. Yep. Biff: Hey, McFly! [both George and Marty turn around] What do you think your doing?Marty: [to himself] Biff.Biff: Hey, I'm talking to you McFly, you Irish bug!George: Oh, hey, Biff. Hey, guys. How are you doin'?Biff: Do you got my homework finished, McFly?George: Well, I figured since it wasn't due till Monday -Biff: Hello? Hello? Anybody home, huh, Think, McFly! Think! I gotta have time to recopy it. Do you realize what what would happen if I handed in my homework in your handwriting? I'll get kicked out of school. You wouldn't want that to happen would ya? WOULD YA?!George: Of course not, Biff. Now I wouldn't want that to happen. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted September 13, 2018 Author Share Posted September 13, 2018 70% of Americans now believe the buffoon should have to testify under oath http://cdn.cnn.com/cnn/2018/images/09/11/rel8c.-.russia,.cohen,.impeachment.pdf 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted September 13, 2018 Share Posted September 13, 2018 On 8/31/2018 at 8:39 AM, Tiberius said: This silly argument that a sitting president can't take time away from his "busy schedule" of watching Fox and Friends is a dud. This is a serious criminal investigation into whether our national election was influenced by a foreign power, if there was obstruction of justice and all sorts of corruption, like where did all the money go from Trump's inauguration committee. The people Trump appointed to the court should have to recuse themselves from this decision. A huge majority of Americans want to know what the hell happened and if Trump knows anything he should have to explain himself. i agree in principal. no one is/should be above the law. however, let me say unequivocally, you are an idiot. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts