Boycott IN-N-OUT

[Keukasmallies]

3 minutes ago, LABillzFan said:

 

His entire purpose for posting is to get a rise out of people who haven't read his stuff enough to put him on ignore.

 

Just throw him on ignore and let him stew in his own stupidity.

 

Or just throw him.....

[LaDexter]

15 minutes ago, sherpa said:

His disciples didn't "bolt."

 

 

Um, yes they did.  Judas bolted first.  But when the "authorities" showed up to "arrest" Jesus, what did his disciples do?

 

THEY BOLTED

 

The only thing missing was this song....

 

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fXTn2gSG7es

 

 

 

17 minutes ago, sherpa said:

Nowhere is it claimed that Jesus derived anything from these people

 

 

LMFAO!!!!

 

Indeed, there is a 2-300 year delay before Christianity/New Testament find footing.  Judaism was impressed how many people Jesus bilked. Judaism saw Jesus as someone who, with a little make-up and added BS like "Last Supper," could be sold to unChosen idiots who would then be "obligated" to "serve Israel."

 

Christianity, a repackaged load of lies designed to create a group of idiot supporters for Israel.  Version one ended with the Crusades....

 

 

 

18 minutes ago, LABillzFan said:

Just throw him on ignore

 

 

It is easier for sub humans to simply puts sheets over their heads.....

[Nanker]

19 minutes ago, LABillzFan said:

 

His entire purpose for posting is to get a rise out of people who haven't read his stuff enough to put him on ignore.

 

Just throw him on ignore and let him stew in his own stupidity.

Hog boy V. 4.0

[sherpa]

22 minutes ago, LaDexter said:

 

 

Um, yes they did.  Judas bolted first.  But when the "authorities" showed up to "arrest" Jesus, what did his disciples do?

 

THEY BOLTED

 

No they didn't.

And the rest of the story?

 

All, ex John, suffered torturous death affirming Jesus, and John did as well, he just didn't die directly for it.

Did you miss that?

You may be the most misinformed individual to ever post.

Seriously.

2000+ years, and you are not aware?

 

And by the way, as late edit, there is noting anywhere that suggests or even hints that Jesus or his disciples enjoyed any material gifts as part of the Gospel.

 

That seems to be you invention.

Edited September 6, 2018 by sherpa

[IDBillzFan]

3 hours ago, sherpa said:

 

No they didn't.

And the rest of the story?

 

All, ex John, suffered torturous death affirming Jesus, and John did as well, he just didn't die directly for it.

Did you miss that?

You may be the most misinformed individual to ever post.

Seriously.

2000+ years, and you are not aware?

 

And by the way, as late edit, there is noting anywhere that suggests or even hints that Jesus or his disciples enjoyed any material gifts as part of the Gospel.

 

That seems to be you invention.

 

If you're not going to put him on ignore, ask him to cite eight passages from the Bible supporting his claim that Jesus and the disciples enjoyed material gifts they received from the followers, which upset all the followers and made them choose Barabbas over Jesus.

 

He'll run away just like the rest of the leftist nuts who come here to troll with their idiocy.

 

Edited September 7, 2018 by LABillzFan

[/dev/null]

5 hours ago, LaDexter said:

Jesus and his disciples were nothing more than a simple "pyramid scheme" where all the "everything" went into their pockets and their followers got nothing.  That is why so many say Jesus was communist.  He was.  He was the Czar of his followers.

 

Then he ran out of food and money.  His "disciples" bolted.  He got arrested.  He went on trial  

 

Those who were bilked out of "everything" voted for Barabbas....

 

Barabbas did have a catchy slogan: 

 

Make Asher Great Again

[LaDexter]

On 9/6/2018 at 7:39 PM, LABillzFan said:

ask him to cite eight passages from the Bible supporting his claim that Jesus and the disciples enjoyed material gifts they received from the followers, which upset all the followers and made them choose Barabbas over Jesus.

 

 

Of course, which demographic wrote the New Testament?  Yeah, the same one that is the only demographic to observe this guy alive, his demographic, and they reject him, consider him a fraud.  Why does any SUB think they know more about Jesus than those who actually were there observing him?

 

WHERE did the "everything" go?

 

The Bible doesn't say - convenient.... because the objective of the Bible is to sell the re-packaged Jesus to unChosen idiots.  

 

What happened in his trial?

 

Jesus refused to heal people.  Jesus refused to walk on water, or couldn't after the guards threw him in...

 

What did the trial prove?

 

It proved Jesus was just a man, nothing more, and he couldn't heal a hangnail.

 

 

Now, let's go over his popularity.  If he really was healing people left and right, he would have been extremely popular.  He wasn't.  He lost his one popularity contest to a murderer....

 

And the SUB arguing the Disciples stood their ground and stayed with Jesus when Jesus was "arrested," he is laughable.  The whole "Last Supper" hoax was added into the New Testament more than one hundred years later so that idiots could argue that, despite his trial, despite his Disciples bolting on him, he really was blah blah blah.

 

 

Most of the "miracles" only had a few disciples observing.  That they bolted on Jesus is all the proof any rational person needs to see the obvious...

Edited September 10, 2018 by LaDexter

[B-Man]

...............Lunchtime !

 

 

.

[LaDexter]

Why did Jews reject Jesus?

 

Is it because many/most Jews know the Old Testament is also a fraud, that Moses was really a Midianite who was offed by Joshua and the Levites on top of Mt Sinai and replaced with a Levite priest who needed 40 days to grow a beard?  Is that why there were laws against claiming to be a "relative" of that which the Rabbis know doesn't exist?

 

What kind of response do you get in Israel if you hand out the New Testament?

 

 

http://www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/meast/05/28/bible.burning/index.html

 

News accounts in Israel have quoted Uzi Aharon, the deputy mayor of Or-Yehuda, as saying he organized students who burned several hundred copies of the New Testament. The deputy mayor gave interviews to Israeli radio and television stations after word of the incident surfaced about two weeks ago.

 

 

 

And then UZI got re-elected for being a Bible burner....

[Koko78]

58 minutes ago, LaDexter said:

Of course, which demographic wrote the New Testament?

 

The Byzantines.

[sherpa]

1 hour ago, LaDexter said:

 

 

Of course, which demographic wrote the New Testament?  Yeah, the same one that is the only demographic to observe this guy alive, his demographic, and they reject him, consider him a fraud.  Why does any SUB think they know more about Jesus than those who actually were there observing him?

 

WHERE did the "everything" go?

 

The Bible doesn't say - convenient.... because the objective of the Bible is to sell the re-packaged Jesus to unChosen idiots.  

 

What happened in his trial?

 

Jesus refused to heal people.  Jesus refused to walk on water, or couldn't after the guards threw him in...

 

What did the trial prove?

 

It proved Jesus was just a man, nothing more, and he couldn't heal a hangnail.

 

 

Now, let's go over his popularity.  If he really was healing people left and right, he would have been extremely popular.  He wasn't.  He lost his one popularity contest to a murderer....

 

And the SUB arguing the Disciples stood their ground and stayed with Jesus when Jesus was "arrested," he is laughable.  The whole "Last Supper" hoax was added into the New Testament more than one hundred years later so that idiots could argue that, despite his trial, despite his Disciples bolting on him, he really was blah blah blah.

 

 

Most of the "miracles" only had a few disciples observing.  That they bolted on Jesus is all the proof any rational person needs to see the obvious...

 

You are truly troubled.

There is no "everything," because they didn't have anything.

Your "trial" recreation is total fiction.

He was initially tried by the Jewish leadership at the time, illegally, as they were afraid of his popularity destroying their financial scheme.

The Sanhedrin, knowing that Jews had no capital punishment option under Roman rule turned him over to Pilate, who found no reason to convict him, so turned him over to Herod, who was a goof and interested in having Jesus perform tricks, which he wouldn't do.

Herod soon turned him back to Pilate, who still wanted him released, but appeased the Jewish leadership and condemned him.

 

Pilate's only concern was preventing an uprising during Passover, where multiple times the number of Jews would have been in Jerusalem.

 

Anyway, if you are going top offer views on this, you ought to be knowledgeable of the basics.........And you aren't.

[BeginnersMind]

2 hours ago, LaDexter said:

Why did Jews reject Jesus?

 

Is it because many/most Jews know the Old Testament is also a fraud, that Moses was really a Midianite who was offed by Joshua and the Levites on top of Mt Sinai and replaced with a Levite priest who needed 40 days to grow a beard?  Is that why there were laws against claiming to be a "relative" of that which the Rabbis know doesn't exist?

 

....

 

 

 

 

[Nanker]