78thealltimegreat Posted August 29, 2018 Posted August 29, 2018 Since Sean is an Andy Reid disciple looking at Andy with young qbs his MO going to back to Donovan is sit them at least half a season this was probably the plan all along and a good idea after watching that oline anyway so Nathan good luck in Baltimore...your going to need it
gobills1212 Posted August 29, 2018 Posted August 29, 2018 (edited) You just cant have a wild duck as a pet. Sorry, itll drive you quackers!! Meanwhile, Cam would argue this strategy. Edited August 29, 2018 by gobills1212 1 1
Stenbar Posted August 29, 2018 Posted August 29, 2018 The longer McProcess goes eithout naming his qb the more I think he has a problem with decision making when applied to the qb position. He screwed it up last yr and he needs this to be done already and move on. Also, did he give any reason why he didnt challenge the Allen run on third down. Looked like a first down to me.
Ol Dirty B Posted August 29, 2018 Posted August 29, 2018 10 minutes ago, Stenbar said: The longer McProcess goes eithout naming his qb the more I think he has a problem with decision making when applied to the qb position. He screwed it up last yr and he needs this to be done already and move on. Also, did he give any reason why he didnt challenge the Allen run on third down. Looked like a first down to me. I'm more confused why he didn't go for it. Who cares, it's the preseason. The only reasoning I can think of for him not challenging is if he wanted to save timeouts for a 2 minute drill at the end of the half. I'd prefer they just go for it. 1
78thealltimegreat Posted August 29, 2018 Author Posted August 29, 2018 21 minutes ago, gobills1212 said: You just cant have a wild duck as a pet. Sorry, itll drive you quackers!! Meanwhile, Cam would argue this strategy. I would probably guess but I think he’d probably ask Andy about developing a young qb before he’d goto Ron Rivera since Andy’s been a qb coach going all the way back to some guy named Farve
Stenbar Posted August 29, 2018 Posted August 29, 2018 15 minutes ago, Ol Dirty B said: I'm more confused why he didn't go for it. Who cares, it's the preseason. The only reasoning I can think of for him not challenging is if he wanted to save timeouts for a 2 minute drill at the end of the half. I'd prefer they just go for it. Right on, he went to the locker room with all three timeouts anyways...
MJS Posted August 29, 2018 Posted August 29, 2018 30 minutes ago, Stenbar said: The longer McProcess goes eithout naming his qb the more I think he has a problem with decision making when applied to the qb position. He screwed it up last yr and he needs this to be done already and move on. Also, did he give any reason why he didnt challenge the Allen run on third down. Looked like a first down to me. The decision is made. What does McDermott have to gain by telling you about it? 3
Aussie Joe Posted August 29, 2018 Posted August 29, 2018 33 minutes ago, Stenbar said: The longer McProcess goes eithout naming his qb the more I think he has a problem with decision making when applied to the qb position. He screwed it up last yr and he needs this to be done already and move on. Also, did he give any reason why he didnt challenge the Allen run on third down. Looked like a first down to me. For all you know he made the decision on draft day..
vincec Posted August 29, 2018 Posted August 29, 2018 3 hours ago, MJS said: The decision is made. What does McDermott have to gain by telling you about it? Agree. It has to be made at this point so that the starter can get a few reps.
Captain_Quint Posted August 29, 2018 Posted August 29, 2018 4 hours ago, Aussie Joe said: For all you know he made the decision on draft day..
thenorthremembers Posted August 29, 2018 Posted August 29, 2018 I think it really depends on the situation. Doug Pederson is also from the Andy Reid coaching tree and Wentz started Week 1 of his rookie year. I wouldn't say the issue with Beane and McDermott is right now, they don't have a lot to choose from. The mistake they made dates back to March when they had a chance to sign seasoned quarterbacks who had multiple starts in the league, some with real success, and opted instead to sign a guy who had three starts in the league and immediately put him in a competition with two guys who had one start combined. The Bills should have had a plan on who their projected starter was in March, and then allowed Allen to change their mind if he was lights out in the lead up to the season opener. Their contingency plan was bad. Arizona was in a similar situation and handled it much better. 1
ddaryl Posted August 29, 2018 Posted August 29, 2018 (edited) tI don't think its was firm plan and if somehow Allen was making plays against the Bengals despite the OL he would of gotten he nod week 1.. But the fact is Peterman has looked the best of all 3 QB's and he is going to get the nod week 1. I think the Bills coaches handled this correctly... They had a plan and they let it play out Edited August 29, 2018 by ddaryl
Stenbar Posted August 29, 2018 Posted August 29, 2018 8 hours ago, MJS said: The decision is made. What does McDermott have to gain by telling you about it? Really? How did you come about this info?
gobills1212 Posted August 29, 2018 Posted August 29, 2018 12 hours ago, 78thealltimegreat said: I would probably guess but I think he’d probably ask Andy about developing a young qb before he’d goto Ron Rivera since Andy’s been a qb coach going all the way back to some guy named Farve All speculation none the less. He is his own man, mind you:)
LABILLBACKER Posted August 29, 2018 Posted August 29, 2018 If we had a slightly better oline I'd say sure start him, get the Allen era started. But this line needs more time to shore things up. Put Peterman out there the 1st half of the year. 1
reddogblitz Posted August 29, 2018 Posted August 29, 2018 15 hours ago, Stenbar said: The longer McProcess goes eithout naming his qb the more I think he has a problem with decision making when applied to the qb position. He screwed it up last yr and he needs this to be done already and move on. Also, did he give any reason why he didnt challenge the Allen run on third down. Looked like a first down to me. mAybe because it's pre season and we need to practice punting too? 1
Patrick Duffy Posted August 29, 2018 Posted August 29, 2018 16 hours ago, Ol Dirty B said: I'm more confused why he didn't go for it. Who cares, it's the preseason. The only reasoning I can think of for him not challenging is if he wanted to save timeouts for a 2 minute drill at the end of the half. I'd prefer they just go for it. Agree with this. Head scratching coaching. Should have been challenged 1st of all.Guess it was poor preseason coaching. Doesn't really give me high hopes going forward though. Think they went into the half with all TO's if I recall correctly, but the whole thing didn't make sense IMO.
reddogblitz Posted August 30, 2018 Posted August 30, 2018 3 hours ago, Patrick_Duffy said: Agree with this. Head scratching coaching. Should have been challenged 1st of all.Guess it was poor preseason coaching. Doesn't really give me high hopes going forward though. Think they went into the half with all TO's if I recall correctly, but the whole thing didn't make sense IMO. i think Coach McDermott just wanted to punt. Guys on the bubble make it or don't based on kicking teAms play. Gives him a chance to see them in a game. It's pre season. 1
John from Riverside Posted August 30, 2018 Posted August 30, 2018 14 hours ago, Stenbar said: Really? How did you come about this info? How do you come by yours? You seem to know what he is thinking or even more laughable...think you can do better
Jpsredemption Posted August 30, 2018 Posted August 30, 2018 ...does rookie qbs no favors but letting his ego get in the way and trading up for a 6'5 MLB and not addressing offense until Rd 5 again. Not a good recipe.
Recommended Posts