Peterman will never live down the 5-pick half . . .

[Green Lightning]

1 hour ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

I knew it was just a matter of time before someone brought that up.    Brady never panicked like that even in his early days as a game manager. Are you predicting a Brady level career for Peterman? 

How about we play some games and see what he does instead of all this built up bile. I guess in your world nobody can ever grow and improve.

1 hour ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

Edited August 29, 2018 by Green Lightning

[26CornerBlitz]

1 minute ago, Green Lightning said:

How about we play some games and see what he does instead of all this built up bile. I guess in your world nobody can ever grow and improve.

How about we play some games and see what he does instead of all this built up bile. I guess in your world nobody can ever grow and improve.

 

1 hour ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

We'll see when he's next between the white lines in real game action that could be in Baltimore on 9/9. 

 

How about reading that I already stated that. 

[Green Lightning]

2 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

 

How about reading that I already stated that. 

You did, between multiple posts denigrating him.

[26CornerBlitz]

1 minute ago, Green Lightning said:

You did, between multiple posts denigrating him.

 

Denigrate? I described what occurred and/or pointed out his demonstrated flaws. Sorry if you can't handle it. 

Edited August 29, 2018 by 26CornerBlitz

[Green Lightning]

1 minute ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

Denigrate? I described what occurred and/or pointed out his demonstrated flaws. Sorry if you can't handle it. 

Sorry you just so touchy when someone disagrees with you.

[26CornerBlitz]

1 minute ago, Green Lightning said:

Sorry you just so touchy when someone disagrees with you.

 

The one getting touchy is you with the built up bile description. 

Edited August 29, 2018 by 26CornerBlitz

[Green Lightning]

Just calling it like it is 26.

[26CornerBlitz]

Just now, Green Lightning said:

Just calling it like it is 26.

 

No. You're providing your opinion and nothing more just as I am. 

[Ol Dirty B]

2 hours ago, Success said:

Didn’t Peyton Manning have a 6 pick game?

 

 

Yea, but he's Peyton Manning. Not Nathan Peterman. Also Peyton probably did that in a full game, not a half.

 

He won't live it down, nor should he when it comes to discussing him as a football player. He played I think the worst I've ever seen a qb play. Because he's a Bill I'm supposed to ignore that?

[Green Lightning]

3 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

No. You're providing your opinion and nothing more just as I am. 

Maybe so, but with a little less bile!

[Sig1Hunter]

What is the definition of a crusade? Is it injecting your (well known,  already) beliefs in every discussion about Peterman so that it ruins the possibility of any positive discourse in the thread? 

 

We get it.  You don't think he's a good QB. 

[Ol Dirty B]

52 minutes ago, Needle said:

A situation like that can sometimes fuel a person's drive to work harder or focus more. 

 

I dont think Peterman needs to be Brady in order to be satisfied with his career.

 

Half wits need him to fail, so they can congratulate themselves on a message board.

 

 

That's not it at all. We just don't think he's good. It does me nothing but good things for him to succeed in a Bills jersey.

 

Some of us have just seen this crap go down over and over again and know better. Start with Flutie, JP, Holcomb, Trent, Fitz, Tuel. These back up qbs aren't coveted for a reason. Remember when everyone wanted Volek? 

[26CornerBlitz]

3 minutes ago, Green Lightning said:

Maybe so, but with a little less bile!

 

 It's odd how marginally talented QBs garner so much support among cetain Bills' fans and if they are criticized people get defensive.  

[Ol Dirty B]

2 minutes ago, Sig1Hunter said:

What is the definition of a crusade? Is it injecting your (well known,  already) beliefs in every discussion about Peterman so that it ruins the possibility of any positive discourse in the thread? 

 

We get it.  You don't think he's a good QB. 

 Aren't we here to discuss our opinions? Is someone supposed to change their opinions because you want positive discourse?

 

You say this in a way that you don't even want a debate, you just want praise heaped upon a guy for no reason. I'll give him that he has played well in the pre season, perhaps I'm more shell shocked than him. Every time he drops back I'm bracing for an interception. Especially on the out routes.

[26CornerBlitz]

6 minutes ago, Sig1Hunter said:

What is the definition of a crusade? Is it injecting your (well known,  already) beliefs in every discussion about Peterman so that it ruins the possibility of any positive discourse in the thread? 

 

We get it.  You don't think he's a good QB. 

 

Now that is weak. If you have positives then counter with a convincing fact based argument in support of Peterman. 

[Dr.Sack]

Let’s be honest: Peterman at 23 sucked. Peterman at 24 is better. Allen at 22 is looking serviceable. Allen at 23, 24 we don’t know. I like Allen, but I’m willing to admit to this point Peterman is slightly better in 2018. All of that aside the question is does McD & Beane think playing Allen in 2018 help his development more than developing Peterman? You have to wonder if watching the tape of every Peterman out route & hitch demonstrate his physical limitations to the point they are willing to take the Allen rookie growing pains? I believe when the dust settles they will select Allen as their starter. 

[Sig1Hunter]

9 minutes ago, Ol Dirty B said:

 Aren't we here to discuss our opinions? Is someone supposed to change their opinions because you want positive discourse?

 

You say this in a way that you don't even want a debate, you just want praise heaped upon a guy for no reason. I'll give him that he has played well in the pre season, perhaps I'm more shell shocked than him. Every time he drops back I'm bracing for an interception. Especially on the out routes.

No. I'm all for you,  me,  and anyone with an opinion expressing that. It's tiresome to hear certain posters (not you) repeat the same thing in every thread.  And,  not just once in the thread.... but polluting each thread with 10 or 15 posts.  

Edited August 29, 2018 by Sig1Hunter

[Ol Dirty B]

1 minute ago, Dr.Sack said:

Let’s be honest: Peterman at 23 sucked. Peterman at 24 is better. Allen at 22 is looking serviceable. Allen at 23, 24 we don’t know. I like Allen, but I’m willing to admit to this point Peterman is slightly better in 2018. All of that aside the question is does McD & Beane think playing Allen in 2018 help his development more than developing Peterman? You have to wonder if watching the tape of every Peterman out route & hitch demonstrate his physical limitations to the point they are willing to take the Allen rookie growing pains? I believe when the dust settles they will select Allen as their starter. 

 

I really think your point on physical limitations is what ultimately hinders him.

 

By all accounts, he's a good guy, hard worker, smart. Yet I just don't think he has the arm. He'll probably hang around the league.

[Prickly Pete]

He blows.

[Sig1Hunter]

Just now, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

Now that is weak. If you have positives then counter with a convincing fact based argument in support of Peterman. 

 So that you can continue to brow beat and talk down to me like you do with anyone else who shares a non-negative opinion about Peterman? 

 

Here's my opinion: Peterman has looked pretty darn good in the preseason.   The best out of all three QBs.  I believe he's shown significant growth from his rookie year.  He probably should start. I'd throw out his preseason stats,  but others have already done that in other threads and you immediately dismiss it with "it's just preseason". I don't really feel like debating with a wall. So,  I'll just leave my opinion at that.