Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
  On 8/29/2018 at 3:11 AM, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

I knew it was just a matter of time before someone brought that up.  :lol:  Brady never panicked like that even in his early days as a game manager. Are you predicting a Brady level career for Peterman? 

Expand  

How about we play some games and see what he does instead of all this built up bile. I guess in your world nobody can ever grow and improve.

  On 8/29/2018 at 3:11 AM, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

Expand  
Edited by Green Lightning
Posted
  On 8/29/2018 at 4:23 AM, Green Lightning said:

How about we play some games and see what he does instead of all this built up bile. I guess in your world nobody can ever grow and improve.

How about we play some games and see what he does instead of all this built up bile. I guess in your world nobody can ever grow and improve.

Expand  

 

  On 8/29/2018 at 3:23 AM, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

We'll see when he's next between the white lines in real game action that could be in Baltimore on 9/9. 

Expand  

 

How about reading that I already stated that. 

Posted
  On 8/29/2018 at 2:35 AM, Success said:

Didn’t Peyton Manning have a 6 pick game?

 

Expand  

 

Yea, but he's Peyton Manning. Not Nathan Peterman. Also Peyton probably did that in a full game, not a half.

 

He won't live it down, nor should he when it comes to discussing him as a football player. He played I think the worst I've ever seen a qb play. Because he's a Bill I'm supposed to ignore that?

Posted

What is the definition of a crusade? Is it injecting your (well known,  already) beliefs in every discussion about Peterman so that it ruins the possibility of any positive discourse in the thread? 

 

We get it.  You don't think he's a good QB. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
  On 8/29/2018 at 3:49 AM, Needle said:

A situation like that can sometimes fuel a person's drive to work harder or focus more. 

 

I dont think Peterman needs to be Brady in order to be satisfied with his career.

 

Half wits need him to fail, so they can congratulate themselves on a message board.

 

Expand  

 

That's not it at all. We just don't think he's good. It does me nothing but good things for him to succeed in a Bills jersey.

 

Some of us have just seen this crap go down over and over again and know better. Start with Flutie, JP, Holcomb, Trent, Fitz, Tuel. These back up qbs aren't coveted for a reason. Remember when everyone wanted Volek? 

Posted
  On 8/29/2018 at 4:41 AM, Sig1Hunter said:

What is the definition of a crusade? Is it injecting your (well known,  already) beliefs in every discussion about Peterman so that it ruins the possibility of any positive discourse in the thread? 

 

We get it.  You don't think he's a good QB. 

Expand  

 Aren't we here to discuss our opinions? Is someone supposed to change their opinions because you want positive discourse?

 

You say this in a way that you don't even want a debate, you just want praise heaped upon a guy for no reason. I'll give him that he has played well in the pre season, perhaps I'm more shell shocked than him. Every time he drops back I'm bracing for an interception. Especially on the out routes.

Posted
  On 8/29/2018 at 4:41 AM, Sig1Hunter said:

What is the definition of a crusade? Is it injecting your (well known,  already) beliefs in every discussion about Peterman so that it ruins the possibility of any positive discourse in the thread? 

 

We get it.  You don't think he's a good QB. 

Expand  

 

Now that is weak. If you have positives then counter with a convincing fact based argument in support of Peterman. 

Posted

Let’s be honest: Peterman at 23 sucked. Peterman at 24 is better. Allen at 22 is looking serviceable. Allen at 23, 24 we don’t know. I like Allen, but I’m willing to admit to this point Peterman is slightly better in 2018. All of that aside the question is does McD & Beane think playing Allen in 2018 help his development more than developing Peterman? You have to wonder if watching the tape of every Peterman out route & hitch demonstrate his physical limitations to the point they are willing to take the Allen rookie growing pains? I believe when the dust settles they will select Allen as their starter. 

Posted (edited)
  On 8/29/2018 at 4:46 AM, Ol Dirty B said:

 Aren't we here to discuss our opinions? Is someone supposed to change their opinions because you want positive discourse?

 

You say this in a way that you don't even want a debate, you just want praise heaped upon a guy for no reason. I'll give him that he has played well in the pre season, perhaps I'm more shell shocked than him. Every time he drops back I'm bracing for an interception. Especially on the out routes.

Expand  

No. I'm all for you,  me,  and anyone with an opinion expressing that. It's tiresome to hear certain posters (not you) repeat the same thing in every thread.  And,  not just once in the thread.... but polluting each thread with 10 or 15 posts.  

Edited by Sig1Hunter
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
  On 8/29/2018 at 4:49 AM, Dr.Sack said:

Let’s be honest: Peterman at 23 sucked. Peterman at 24 is better. Allen at 22 is looking serviceable. Allen at 23, 24 we don’t know. I like Allen, but I’m willing to admit to this point Peterman is slightly better in 2018. All of that aside the question is does McD & Beane think playing Allen in 2018 help his development more than developing Peterman? You have to wonder if watching the tape of every Peterman out route & hitch demonstrate his physical limitations to the point they are willing to take the Allen rookie growing pains? I believe when the dust settles they will select Allen as their starter. 

Expand  

 

I really think your point on physical limitations is what ultimately hinders him.

 

By all accounts, he's a good guy, hard worker, smart. Yet I just don't think he has the arm. He'll probably hang around the league.

Posted
  On 8/29/2018 at 4:49 AM, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

Now that is weak. If you have positives then counter with a convincing fact based argument in support of Peterman. 

Expand  

 So that you can continue to brow beat and talk down to me like you do with anyone else who shares a non-negative opinion about Peterman? 

 

Here's my opinion: Peterman has looked pretty darn good in the preseason.   The best out of all three QBs.  I believe he's shown significant growth from his rookie year.  He probably should start. I'd throw out his preseason stats,  but others have already done that in other threads and you immediately dismiss it with "it's just preseason". I don't really feel like debating with a wall. So,  I'll just leave my opinion at that.  

  • Like (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...