transplantbillsfan Posted August 27, 2018 Posted August 27, 2018 So that when Peterman gets knocked out of the game in week 1, McCarron can step in so that Allen gets maybe another week or two of the OL trying to find ANY answer before he's inevitably thrust in as the starter when McCarron is then knocked out of the game in week 2, 3, or 4.
BuffaloBillyG Posted August 27, 2018 Posted August 27, 2018 19 minutes ago, Hebert19 said: none. As I stated in the email about peterman being trade bait I believe its McCarron that is...first team that loses their starter will be calling. Yes, they will be calling. The Jets. For Bridgewater.
Boatdrinks Posted August 27, 2018 Posted August 27, 2018 31 minutes ago, Sky Diver said: AJ May start. He may have to eventually. This OL is putrid.
Direhard Fan Posted August 27, 2018 Posted August 27, 2018 I must add that Josh looked lost and held the ball to long. It wasn't all on the line. Not saying they didn't stink but he has to get rid of the ball and not take sacks. He should have had an int. also. Peterman should start. He looked poised and has shown promise.
reddogblitz Posted August 27, 2018 Posted August 27, 2018 1 hour ago, Rocbillsfan1 said: Because in back to back weeks our starting qb has had to leave the game due to getting hurt behind a horrible online. I’m pretty sure all 3 will play this year. all 3 played last year and we had a better O Line. And if our 3rd guy didn't step up in the clutch, we'd be sitting on 18 now.
Formerly Allan in MD Posted August 27, 2018 Posted August 27, 2018 With our very offensive line, we need as much insurance as possible behind center. In our next game, I don't want to see any of these three guys play. Actually, other teams (Redskins etc.) are bringing in cannon fodder quarterbacks for this week's games.
boater Posted August 27, 2018 Posted August 27, 2018 7 minutes ago, Direhard Fan said: I must add that Josh looked lost and held the ball to long. It wasn't all on the line. Not saying they didn't stink but he has to get rid of the ball and not take sacks. He should have had an int. also. Peterman should start. He looked poised and has shown promise. Peterman can float a good ball to the sidelines, which looks good in pre-season play against a vanilla defense. Play a regular season game, against a tricked out D, and Petermen's skills will fade into nothing. Petermen's ceiling against regular season-D's is low. Allen's ceiling is higher.
dollars 2 donuts Posted August 27, 2018 Posted August 27, 2018 2 hours ago, ******* said: If peterman starts what is the point of keeping AJ? Showcase him on Thursday then trade him I believe Sal mentioned it would cost the Bills about 3 plus million dollars to get rid of him. In other words unless you are so worried about the extra roster spot it would be a wash to get rid of him, as much as just keeping him.
Over 29 years of fanhood Posted August 27, 2018 Posted August 27, 2018 Because we really don’t know anything until a few games in. panthers didn’t rush or blitz in gm 1. so we’ve yet to see if Nate fixed his happy feet. He looked poor under pressure v Cleveland. Vs Cincinnati’s twos they dropped into cover what looked like cover four and no blitzes. A fresh aggressive defense will be the real litmus test. And i say once more. Wow what a difference between Cleveland and cincis 1s and 2s. O line was just abused 1
Bleeding Bills Blue Posted August 27, 2018 Posted August 27, 2018 2 hours ago, ******* said: If peterman starts what is the point of keeping AJ? Showcase him on Thursday then trade him Trade him for what?
BuffaloBillies Posted August 27, 2018 Posted August 27, 2018 I'd trade him. I'd trade Clay. I'd even trade McCoy. If can't get OL help this year through the trades, start stock-piling draft picks. OL is a disaster. This year is gonna be rough, start planning for next year. 1
reddogblitz Posted August 27, 2018 Posted August 27, 2018 (edited) 35 minutes ago, Direhard Fan said: I must add that Josh looked lost and held the ball to long. It wasn't all on the line. Not saying they didn't stink but he has to get rid of the ball and not take sacks. He should have had an int. also. Peterman should start. He looked poised and has shown promise. I agree. The line was bad, but so was he. I was very disappointed when in the 1st quarter, he had 2 plays in a row where he could have done something, but made horrid passes instead. I'm talking about the one where he rolled out out of pressure to the right and had time and had Clay deep, but horribly under threw him. I was told with that cannon arm he would never under throw anyone. Luckily it wasn't a pick. The next play he had time and looked like some open guys but he just rifled it out there between them all. I'm not sure who he was throwing to. Another punt. He did make some nice short passes which I was glad to see. Edited August 27, 2018 by reddogblitz
Pirate Angel Posted August 27, 2018 Posted August 27, 2018 We may need like 5 QBs dressed for gameday
ddaryl Posted August 27, 2018 Posted August 27, 2018 2 hours ago, Dr. Who said: The o-line appears so bad . . . not sure two qbs is enough to get through the season. seriously we might want to start scouring the waivers for a 4th and possible 5th option
Recommended Posts