Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

 

16 minutes ago, joesixpack said:

 

And, on top of your sterling academic credentials, you actually BELIEVE the government of the IRI.

 

Which makes you even MORE qualified, amirite?

\

No you retard, my academic credentials (BS Biochemistry SUNY Geneseo) make me aware of the differences between the uranium enrichment levels used in the generation of stable nuclear power (say 10% enrichment), and that necessary to produce nuclear weapons (90%) and that you absolutely can test for the difference.

 

And while you can use stable nuclear power over time as a way to achieve weapons grade fissionable matter, it absolutely can be tested. Because weapons grade plutonium does not just magically appear because you want it.

 

And guess what, tests were done. There was no sign of it. As far as I know, every independent test done said that Iran was playing my the rules. And 45 eff-ed them over anyway. So now they have no reason to live up to their end of the agreement. And guess what, once you have a framework for stable nuclear power, it is quite possible to develop nuclear weaponry (though it takes time and equipment)

 

If we had any sign, any whatsoever that they were betraying their deal, then it would have been warranted. 

 

Jesus, here I am, explaining nuclear chemistry to people who think it's pronounced Nu-CU-lur

15 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

 

The EU isn't much more than a banking cabal who desperately seek to destroy the concept of the European nation state, and the individual cultures they protect.

 

To those ends their long term strategy has been to flood Europe with refugees from the Middle East, Northern Africa, and Asia to break down the understanding of what it means to be German, Spanish, Italian, etc. as a people lacking a true national identity are more easily swayed into accepting a single government covering all of Europe.

 

An oppressive theocratic regime in Iran, and the instability they cause in the region is central to those policy goals, so of course the EU was trying to salvage the deal.

 

 

Wow. Excuse me, I need to adjust your tin foil hat. 

 

How do you get to a computer between screaming at your genitals on a street corner?

Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, WhitewalkerInPhilly said:

Jesus, here I am, explaining nuclear chemistry to people who think it's pronounced Nu-CU-lur

Wow. Excuse me, I need to adjust your tin foil hat. 

 

How do you get to a computer between screaming at your genitals on a street corner?

 

What, exactly, do you believe the EU to be?

 

What is it's purpose, and how was it organized?

 

Further, how do you reconcile your dismissal with the realities of current EU immigration policies, and the effect they've had on the nation states, and the citizens, of European member states?

Edited by TakeYouToTasker
Posted
2 minutes ago, WhitewalkerInPhilly said:

If we had any sign, any whatsoever that they were betraying their deal, then it would have been warranted. 

 

We had plenty of signs. You ignore them because you live in an echo chamber of your own creation. 

 

We had plenty of signs of not only noncompliance, but of the insidious lengths the former administration took to assure the deal (which wouldn't prevent Iran from developing WMD in the first place) got signed. 

 

You claim to know what you're talking about, yet you keep demonstrating you don't. Your use of non-progfascists sanctioned invectives like "retard" would get you thrown off the the island by the way. 

Posted
1 minute ago, WhitewalkerInPhilly said:

If we had any sign, any whatsoever that they were betraying their deal, then it would have been warranted. 

 

So you have absolute concrete proof that every secret enrichment and test site had the doors flung wide open to international inspectors and that the IRI just willingly gave up everything needed to enrich uranium?

 

Sorry, I don't believe the IRI. I also don't believe the deal at the time was the right thing to do. Obama capitulated to the EU on the deal (like he did countless other times over his tenure). The Eurotrash were able to pistol-whip the ever-effete Obama into doing ANYTHING they desired.

 

Posted
Just now, Kelly101 said:

It seems that the left has collectively turned into the joker...they just want to see the world burn...

as long as they get trump.

 

Correct. The prog-fascsts (who are still the minority - just the vocal minority - on the left) have taken the reins and moderate "liberals" are too scared of being called "racists" to take the reins back. 

Posted
10 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

 

What, exactly, do you believe the EU to be?

 

What is it's purpose, and how was it organized?

 

Further, how do you reconcile your dismissal with the realities of current EU immigration policies, and the effect they've had on the nation states, and the citizens, of European member states?

 

 

 

Haven't  you seen Whitewalker's card ?

 

wile-e-coyote-genius-business-card-featu

  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted
1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

(For WhiteWalker)

 

You know what I find interesting? Alavi's been shadowbanned.

 

Shows you where twitter's allegiances lie. Time for antitrust legislation against twitter.

 

Posted
2 hours ago, westside said:

Why do you want to see American soldiers killed in a war?

 

That question was stupid and offensive. Clearly not worth consideration. 

Posted
9 minutes ago, The_Dude said:

 

That question was stupid and offensive. Clearly not worth consideration. 

 

Hardly.

 

It's more than valid, especially given your penchant for war mongering and open disdain for peace.

Posted
25 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

 

Hardly.

 

It's more than valid, especially given your penchant for war mongering and open disdain for peace.

 

I imply a question was both stupid and offensive and you come running to state otherwise. Shocking. Just shocking. 

Posted
Just now, The_Dude said:

 

I imply a question was both stupid and offensive and you come running to state otherwise. Shocking. Just shocking. 

 

You didn't imply it, you outright stated it, so I guess we can add at least one more thing you're wrong about.

 

The truth, Dude, is that you don't handle scrutiny of your positions very well, because often times when those positions come under scrutiny, it demonstrates either what a poor job you've done reasoning through your position, or how morally bankrupt it is.

 

This is one of those times.

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
5 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

 

You didn't imply it, you outright stated it, so I guess we can add at least one more thing you're wrong about.

 

The truth, Dude, is that you don't handle scrutiny of your positions very well, because often times when those positions come under scrutiny, it demonstrates either what a poor job you've done reasoning through your position, or how morally bankrupt it is.

 

 

Or how stoned he is.

  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted
1 hour ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

 

You didn't imply it, you outright stated it, so I guess we can add at least one more thing you're wrong about.

 

The truth, Dude, is that you don't handle scrutiny of your positions very well, because often times when those positions come under scrutiny, it demonstrates either what a poor job you've done reasoning through your position, or how morally bankrupt it is.

 

This is one of those times.

 

My position is you’re a pompous twat. 

Posted
10 minutes ago, The_Dude said:

 

My position is you’re a pompous twat. 

Lol!

You have a lot of nerve. You can't debate him so you resort to name calling? 

 

Try being better than that. Have a great rest of your day ?

×
×
  • Create New...