Boatdrinks Posted August 27, 2018 Posted August 27, 2018 Getting rid of the ball in a 3, 5 step quick passing game is not the same thing as a “ quick release”. Allen’s release is plenty quick. Why is it assumed that the Bills don’t think Allen can play a quick passing game? The types of passes they’ve called for Allen in the ps appeared to be designed to evaluate his AND the WRs big play potential. Daboll even asked him what kind of routes he wanted called in the CAR game. We know that the quick stuff is the only thing Peterman is capable of. So that’s what he’s been asked to do. Allen hasn’t played , and has a very capable arm. He doesn’t have any established “ game” to be assigned to him. Peterman’s “ game” is assigned to him by his physical limitations. Anyway, the best case to be made for Nate Peterman starting isn’t the style of offense, as I’d suspect they can run that style with Allen as well. Keeping Allen in one piece while they sort out this tire fire of an OL is the case. My bet is the Bills do this, and bring Allen in after the OL has taken on some sort of acceptable form. 1
bdutton Posted August 27, 2018 Posted August 27, 2018 6 minutes ago, quinnearlysghost88 said: What completion rate are you quoting? Vs the Bengals 3rd stringers? You’re out of your mind. C/ATT YDS AVG TD INT SACKS RTG Nathan Peterman 9/10 119 11.9 1 1 0-0 110.0 Against Carolina's starters. http://www.espn.com/nfl/boxscore?gameId=401030946
Figster Posted August 27, 2018 Posted August 27, 2018 1 hour ago, Perry Turtle said: Guys like Jim Kelly, John Elway, and Peyton Manning all played as rookies behind poor offensive lines. They turned out okay. The nature of the draft places the better QB prospects on bad teams. If the prospect is a franchise caliber QB, they elevate the play of the bad team in some way. If the prospect is not truly an elite NFL QB, they fall to the level of the bad players on the team. The sooner a coaching staff knows whether they have a QB that elevates the team, the better. Hiding Allen accomplishes nothing if he is a franchise QB. Its odd Steve Deberg kept coming in to rescue Elway behind the same Oline and managed a 9 - 7 season. Kelly played pro ball in another league. Bad comparisons IMO. with all due respect sir
quinnearlysghost88 Posted August 27, 2018 Posted August 27, 2018 6 minutes ago, bdutton said: C/ATT YDS AVG TD INT SACKS RTG Nathan Peterman 9/10 119 11.9 1 1 0-0 110.0 Against Carolina's starters. http://www.espn.com/nfl/boxscore?gameId=401030946 One drive. And the next an INT. It’s Peterman in a nutshell. I’m excited to read a game’s worth of drive recaps that read “short pass left” “short pass right” 7 minutes ago, bdutton said: C/ATT YDS AVG TD INT SACKS RTG Nathan Peterman 9/10 119 11.9 1 1 0-0 110.0 Against Carolina's starters. http://www.espn.com/nfl/boxscore?gameId=401030946
Buffaloflash Posted August 27, 2018 Posted August 27, 2018 2 hours ago, Baba Booey said: should just trade McCoy now and get draft pick for him. PUT the PIPE down!
bdutton Posted August 27, 2018 Posted August 27, 2018 4 minutes ago, quinnearlysghost88 said: One drive. And the next an INT. It’s Peterman in a nutshell. I’m excited to read a game’s worth of drive recaps that read “short pass left” “short pass right” 1 TD and 1 INT. Second drive was nearing the red zone when the pass from Peterman when through O'Leary's hands. Not Petermans fault IMO. That was his only pick in his 3 game appearances with 41 attempts. I am by no means a Peterman boot licker. I expected AJ to be the starter but through all of the pre-season Peterman has been the best QB both statistically and with his on field presence. I say Peterman has won the job for now. Let Allen work on his weaknesses with the number 2's in practice and eventually put him in when ready.
Buffaloflash Posted August 27, 2018 Posted August 27, 2018 2 hours ago, NewEra said: No. He might die. I’d like our future qb to be breathing going into next season. Sit him for the first 3 weeks minimum. I don’t think he’d learn much from playing in those 3 games because he’d probably be concussed Hahaha,You're probably right, because I thought he was Concussed yesterday after taking that hit that banged his head to the ground! I almost do-doed on myself! 1
Augie Posted August 27, 2018 Posted August 27, 2018 2 hours ago, Gugny said: I voted yes. None of our QBs has looked good with our first string vs. a first string defense. It seems that most here are in agreement that the starting OL hasn't done any of the QBs any favors. Add a couple key drops in yesterday's game, a scramble for (what appeared to be) a first down that should have been challenged, but was not, and some very questionable play-calling by Dabol - and I can't fault Allen much for yesterday's lack of production. I'd say two of the sacks were on him - maybe. Kid had no time. He looked just as good against Cleveland's second string as Peterman looked last night. I feel that if Allen and Peterman are equal, that Allen should get the start because there's no benefit to starting Peterman (he doesn't have much real experience, either). I also feel that Allen and Peterman have both looked better than McCarron. That's why I voted yes. If I had to bet, my money would be on McCarron starting. I do not think Peterman will start unless the other two are injured. Based upon yesterday, I’d change “unless” to UNTIL. Yikes! I’m wonder if they sit around the QB room and say “why don’t you go ahead and start.” “Oh no, by all means, YOU go ahead and start, I’ll look after the clipboard until they get that front straightened out.” 2
Gugny Posted August 27, 2018 Posted August 27, 2018 3 hours ago, Baba Booey said: Our offensive line is going to get someone killed back there. Dont want it to be our future QB. Run game will suffer too, should just trade McCoy now and get draft pick for him. Castillo should be fired and Vlad should never see the field again. If McCoy gets healthy, they should absolutely trade him.
Gugny Posted August 27, 2018 Posted August 27, 2018 This further solidifies my desire to have Allen start: 1
Domdab99 Posted August 27, 2018 Posted August 27, 2018 3 hours ago, ddaryl said: Oh do explain that in full detail.. everything discussed here is pretty civil and very honest And often unknowledgeable ?
Green Lightning Posted August 27, 2018 Posted August 27, 2018 4 hours ago, whatdrought said: Actually, I did say that it was definitely possible that he could have improved. Read my post. As for the argument that he has improved, I think that he has shown some good things. He has also been inconsistent. Every chance he has had to put the nail in the qb competition he has faltered. I think Peterman can be a decent QB in the right situation, but his lack of talent in general is a handicap to this already suffering offense. He is also very mistake prone (Even just looking at this year, and ignoring last) and that is not going to help a bad offense be better. We disagree. Time will tell.
whatdrought Posted August 27, 2018 Posted August 27, 2018 4 minutes ago, Green Lightning said: We disagree. Time will tell. True enough. And I hope that the starter lights it up and that the backup is great and we're set at the position for the next 15 years.
Green Lightning Posted August 27, 2018 Posted August 27, 2018 Just now, whatdrought said: True enough. And I hope that the starter lights it up and that the backup is great and we're set at the position for the next 15 years. And we agree! 1
ddaryl Posted August 27, 2018 Posted August 27, 2018 48 minutes ago, Domdab99 said: And often unknowledgeable ? OK I'm listening, please go on 1
Rockinon Posted August 27, 2018 Posted August 27, 2018 Josh has been pretty good through out the preseason. I like a lot of what he has done. But watching Peterman get rid of the ball so quickly was rather surprising. He was finding open receivers more quickly. Josh is doing a great job, but he still needs to polish up his quick hit reads. I think he has made tremendous strides but just isn't quite there yet. If you would have told me that Peterman would be leading the QB battle at this point a couple of months ago, I probably would have laughed at you. He has been very impressive in all three games so far, though. Sure hope we get our OL straitened out soon. It was down right painful watching JA get blown up before he was even finished dropping back in some cases. Perhaps the OL began to correct some things by the time Peterman came in, but it looked to me like he was also helping himself out by getting the ball out very quickly. Although, it didn't really look like JA was holding the ball that long(That line was terrible), I think he was just a tad slower getting the ball out than NP. I know JA is going to start at some point. I just don't see it happening week 1. I think perhaps Peterman is trusting his receivers to be where they are supposed to be and letting it rip. And maybe Josh isn't quite that far along in the process. At this point I think NP is out in 1st place.
bdutton Posted August 27, 2018 Posted August 27, 2018 Best case scenario: O-Line improves and Peterman gets us to another 9-7 season. Peterman has a good season completing 70% of his passes, 2500 passing yards and a 90-95 passer rating. Trade Peterman for a high 3rd/low 2nd rounder and start Allen next year.
Baba Booey Posted August 28, 2018 Posted August 28, 2018 6 hours ago, Buffaloflash said: PUT the PIPE down! I could See if we were a running back away from being a playoff team but we’re not. Why not get something for mc coy while he’s still healthy.
RocCityRoller Posted August 28, 2018 Posted August 28, 2018 (edited) 10 hours ago, Perry Turtle said: Guys like Jim Kelly, John Elway, and Peyton Manning all played as rookies behind poor offensive lines. They turned out okay. The nature of the draft places the better QB prospects on bad teams. If the prospect is a franchise caliber QB, they elevate the play of the bad team in some way. If the prospect is not truly an elite NFL QB, they fall to the level of the bad players on the team. The sooner a coaching staff knows whether they have a QB that elevates the team, the better. Hiding Allen accomplishes nothing if he is a franchise QB. I can't speak for Elway or Manning, but Jim Kelly came in in 1986 and immediately played behind Kent Hull (C), Jim Richter (G), Tim Vogler (G), Will Wolford (T) and Joe Devlin (T). He had the same line in 1987 when Ballard and Ferrotte were backups.... He also was not a rookie after many seasons in the USFL. That line might as well be the Electric Company compared to this OL. Wolford and Hull are among the best OL in Bills history. Richter, Devlin and Vogler were no bums either. BTW Kelly also had Andre Reed, Jerry Butler, Chris Burkett and Pete Metzelaars to throw to from day one. Compare to Benjamin, Coleman, Kerley and Clay. Comparing the situation Allen is facing vs Kelly is laughable. Despite the OL, WR talent etc, the '86 Bills were 4-12. The '87 Bills were 7-8 in a strike shortened season. A team with Kelly, Reed, Bruce Smith, Kent Hull, Will Wolford and Jim Ritcher went 4-12. They went 7-8 after. Does this fanbase have the gumption to do that? Circle the Wagons and Invest in the future. Edited August 28, 2018 by RocCityRoller 3
RocCityRoller Posted August 28, 2018 Posted August 28, 2018 (edited) I voted Peterman. I want to add I am no Peterman fan boy, he is limited. I think the best Peterman is like Chad Pennington. Chad Pennington can win you games if the rest of the team is solid and the offense is suited to him. Peterman has earned the start, what else can a guy do? Don't make him throw the out LOL. If he is staring down his WR on outs as some have supposed on TBD, fix it. I think it is arm strength, time will tell. I do like his tempo, and ability to read a defense at the line. He reads the middle of the field well and his intermediate passes have some heat. He is smart and has tempo. That could help the RBs and OL until they sort this mess out on offense. I do see Peterman as a long term #2 QB. I view this situation like the McNabb - Pederson situation in Philly in 1999. I was living in Philadelphia at the time. No one questioned sitting McNabb for a while until he was ready, because he was a rough talent. McNabb was drafted #2 overall in 1999. The Philly offense was hot garbage, and they let freaking Doug Pederson take the lumps for 9 games. McNabb started in game 10 when the Eagles were 2-7 and there was nothing left to lose. The Philly offense had Duce Staley at RB and not much else at WR, TE or OL. Sound familiar? I think Peterman is better than Pederson, and McCoy is better than Staley. Benjamin and Clay are better than Philly had at WR and TE. That said Philly had Douglas and Whiting on the DL, Trotter at LB and Dawkins, Vincent, Taylor and Harris at DB. The Bills secondary may be up to the task, but the front 7???? Philly ended the season winning 3 of 5, and ended at 5-11 but had something to build on. I see a similar trajectory here. McNabb went on to take his team to 4 NFC Championship games and a Super Bowl. Allen could be so much more. You do not let a top 10 pick get David Carr'd and killed. Sit Allen for 8-10 games andgive him 8-10 games of real NFL game planning. Have him work with Nathan and AJ in the film room, working on presnap reads and audibles. I think Peterman is very good at this, especially for a 2nd yr QB. Implement the quick strike elements of the offense as the full time offense. Get Allen to practice in the quick tempo, short and medium strike offense the team has looked good with in the preseason. The offense has looked best at this in the pre-season, and Peterman is the best at running it. Have Josh play as the dedicated #2 and scout team QB. Has to play as if to be ready at a moment's notice, and offer something most scout team QBs can't offer. This could also help the defense prepare against big armed and scrambling QBs. At game 8-10 put Allen in if the Bills are 2-6 or so. If not let Peterman play until they are eliminated. Peterman has earned at least that much. With 8-10 games the offense should have some semblance of an identity and a 'go to' play book. Probably up-tempo, short to intermediate strikes, draws and some play action. Bring Josh Allen along with the expectation that he can run that offense in practice. Don't put him in until he gets those presnap reads down and can complete those passes well. Then when Allen does come in you can keep the same offense but add in the wrinkles his mobility and arm offer over Peterman. RPOs, deep outs and the occasional bomb. That adds dynamics to the same offense without a reset or whole different offensive philosophy. It seems the most sound plan to me at this point. Edited August 28, 2018 by RocCityRoller
Recommended Posts