Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Be nice if your OLine could play 2nd and 3rd team players all year. Think Ducasse sees a little difference between Geno Atkins and whoever his backups are?

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Magnetar said:

Peterman is superior to Allen with the same crap OL. Ramsey is correct, Allen is trash...

Jesus !@#$ing Christ you people are idiots.

  • Like (+1) 4
  • Sad 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Brianmoorman4jesus said:

Peterman has run THIS offense better then any other qb on the roster all preseason and it’s not even close. I wanted to see Allen win this thing today but at this point, you have to start Nate. The kid has put the work in. He looks a little like a mixture of Cousins and Pennington to me. Not as good as either but not to bad.

 

Yeah and he gets rid of the ball faster which is good with this o-line. I'm still worried against a real defense his arm strength will lead to picks but you can't really argue that he hasn't won the job.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, Magnetar said:

Peterman is superior to Allen with the same crap OL. Ramsey is correct, Allen is trash...

Just maybe he is, but it is an absolute that your take on him from this game is premature and is worth less than nothing. Consider that.

Posted
1 minute ago, Magnetar said:

Peterman is superior to Allen with the same crap OL. Ramsey is correct, Allen is trash...

Put down the crack pipe. Simply wait until the opener with Peterman starting...

Posted
3 minutes ago, Formerly Allan in MD said:

He probably will start but not because you your arrogant self says so.

Replying to this guy just makes you a fish on a hook. He is trolling. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, x-BillzeBubba said:

why is the OL suddenly protecting their  man?

Because the Bengals starting Dline (namely Atkins) is on the bench

 

Posted
Just now, LABILLBACKER said:

Start Peterman week 1. But play the 2nd string oline.

Um, that's the line that played the first half. 

Posted
Just now, 26CornerBlitz said:

Keep in mind the Bills are now working against a 2nd team D. 

 

When Peterman played well with the 1s in the first pre season game people tried to claim the other QBs were at a disadvantage because they had to play with less talented players.

 

How the narrative shifts every week to try and discredit Peterman.

 

I want Allen to start as much as anybody but only if he earns it. Peterman has played better. I have no doubt Allen will be the better player eventually but he hasn’t shown he’s the better player this pre season.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, Formerly Allan in MD said:

Unfortunately

 

Same story last week when McCarron was getting hammered in Cleveland.  The OL is putrid against 1st team DLs.

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted

The quick release and decisiveness is what endeared so many on this board to Peterman last year. He still has that and a better command of the offense overall. No reason why he shouldn't be our starter or why he can't be successful. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, davefan66 said:

 

Allen has the physical tools, needs the game to slow down a bit. 

 

Needs some time to sit and learn.  Albeit, the o-line did him no favors with a few of the jailbreaks.  He did cause some of the blocking issues with the slow release.

What evidence do you have to support the assertion that a quarterback improves by sitting and learning?

 

 

 

 

Posted

I don’t think Allen should start day 1. 

 

He was playing today like he is still adjusting to the speed of the NFL, which is 100% expected. Things haven’t slowed down for h8m yet and that is perfectly ok. 

 

 

Nate doesn’t have nearly the talent Allen does, but you can tell there is a noticeable difference in his ability to quickly process what he is seeing. 

 

Let Allen sit and learn. Start Nate or AJ. That’s my opinion. 

 

You really only get 1 chance to start Allen, and starting him week 1 would look like they are rushing it, IMO. 

  • Like (+1) 2
×
×
  • Create New...