26CornerBlitz Posted August 26, 2018 Posted August 26, 2018 4 hours ago, ChasBB said: Yes, remember last year, Peterman was (I'm fairly certain) the ONLY QB that Belichick took a serious look at pre 2017 draft - that SAYS something and I don't care what anyone says. Peterman is a starting talent in the NFL and I want him on the Bills for the long term - to back up Josh or to start when needed - whatever - we need to keep him. He's a very good QB and Buffalo needs to keep him. I rate the QBs 1. Josh, 2. Peterman, 3. McCarron - and if Peterman ends up starting a few games while Josh develops a bit more, he'll do fine and probably excel. However, Josh is looking very good. https://patriotswire.usatoday.com/2017/04/11/what-to-make-of-patriots-decision-to-work-out-pitt-qb-nathan-peterman/ Belichick took a look at him yet passed on him multiple times. From the Patriot's wire link: "And he’s probably interested in the Pitt draft class. He’s just doing his due diligence, while messing with the other 31 teams and the media at the same time. That’s Belichick’s specialty." Until proven otherwise, Peterman simply is not starting caliber as the evidence has shown regardless of what you think. Your thinking that "he'll do fine and probably excel" certainly isn't based on what he has shown on the field in actual regular season competition with the same demonstrated flaws still present from his rookie season.
BullBuchanan Posted August 26, 2018 Posted August 26, 2018 3 hours ago, ChasBB said: Hey, that's almost exactly what AG Sessions is saying on his Twitter page!! https://twitter.com/AGJefffSessionsI trust both plans - McDermott's & Sessions'. You know that's fake, right?
BullBuchanan Posted August 26, 2018 Posted August 26, 2018 (edited) 58 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said: Belichick took a look at him yet passed on him multiple times. From the Patriot's wire link: "And he’s probably interested in the Pitt draft class. He’s just doing his due diligence, while messing with the other 31 teams and the media at the same time. That’s Belichick’s specialty." Until proven otherwise, Peterman simply is not starting caliber as the evidence has shown regardless of what you think. Your thinking that "he'll do fine and probably excel" certainly isn't based on what he has shown on the field in actual regular season competition with the same demonstrated flaws still present from his rookie season. Are those Josh Allen's college stats? Edited August 26, 2018 by BullBuchanan
Johnny Hammersticks Posted August 26, 2018 Posted August 26, 2018 16 hours ago, SWATeam said: Are they built for speed or comfort? They’re definitely not big enough for either yet, but I’m working on it.
The Red King Posted August 26, 2018 Posted August 26, 2018 1 hour ago, wppete said: Oh please, oh please, oh please...
Prickly Pete Posted August 26, 2018 Posted August 26, 2018 How about reaching out to teams with O-linemen? 2
Saint Doug Posted August 26, 2018 Posted August 26, 2018 19 hours ago, ChasBB said: Yes, remember last year, Peterman was (I'm fairly certain) the ONLY QB that Belichick took a serious look at pre 2017 draft - that SAYS something and I don't care what anyone says. Peterman is a starting talent in the NFL and I want him on the Bills for the long term - to back up Josh or to start when needed - whatever - we need to keep him. He's a very good QB and Buffalo needs to keep him. I rate the QBs 1. Josh, 2. Peterman, 3. McCarron - and if Peterman ends up starting a few games while Josh develops a bit more, he'll do fine and probably excel. However, Josh is looking very good. https://patriotswire.usatoday.com/2017/04/11/what-to-make-of-patriots-decision-to-work-out-pitt-qb-nathan-peterman/ Im pretty sure this was just to make Bills fans freak out and trick the Bills FO to draft him.
billspro Posted August 26, 2018 Posted August 26, 2018 1 hour ago, OJ Tom said: How about reaching out to teams with O-linemen? We need a pass rush and an oline.
stuvian Posted August 26, 2018 Posted August 26, 2018 this either has legs or it doesn't. I'm starting to think it's the latter
Elite Poster Posted August 26, 2018 Posted August 26, 2018 If LaConfora reporting it, chances are it's false. 1
Prickly Pete Posted August 27, 2018 Posted August 27, 2018 1 hour ago, billspro said: We need a pass rush and an oline. Yeah, but not having a pass rush won't get your 1st round rookie QB (or journeyman backup) killed.
Soda Popinski Posted August 27, 2018 Posted August 27, 2018 I am not as big a fan of this idea as I was before our entire Oline looked like they couldn't block a 5th grader from coming through in a game of red rover. We need to use draft picks and free agent dollars on the oline. It's bad. 1
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted August 27, 2018 Posted August 27, 2018 2 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said: I'm of the mind that a 1 and 2 is a BARGAIN for Mack, but one trade Beane won't make.
Gugny Posted August 27, 2018 Posted August 27, 2018 1 minute ago, joesixpack said: I'm of the mind that a 1 and 2 is a BARGAIN for Mack, but one trade Beane won't make. I agree. Anything less than two firsts is a steal .............. for a team that's one pass rusher away from being a contender. I think the Bills still have too many holes to justify trading early picks.
T master Posted August 27, 2018 Posted August 27, 2018 This doesn't really surprise me any good GM would want to fish a bit to see what it would take especially with the amount of cap room they will have next year ! But they have a lot more pressing issues on the table right now Bean might just be sowing the seed in Macks mind to let him know that the Bills would be interested if he can't get a longterm deal done this year with the Raiders .
Recommended Posts