The Real Buffalo Joe Posted August 21, 2018 Posted August 21, 2018 (edited) Of course each player's desires are gonna be different. But assuming they wanted to stay in the game, generally speaking, which do you feel would be best? For arguments sake, all compensation is relatively the same. Edited August 21, 2018 by The Real Buffalo Joe
WhoTom Posted August 21, 2018 Posted August 21, 2018 Commentating would be the least stressful - you work fewer hours and there really aren't any repercussions for mistakes. Whether that's the best post-playing career or not depends on the player, but I choose lower stress unless there's a good reason to take the stressful job.
JoPar_v2 Posted August 21, 2018 Posted August 21, 2018 You can’t generalize this and it’s a waste of time to try 2
Soda Popinski Posted August 21, 2018 Posted August 21, 2018 12 minutes ago, WhoTom said: Commentating would be the least stressful - you work fewer hours and there really aren't any repercussions for mistakes. Whether that's the best post-playing career or not depends on the player, but I choose lower stress unless there's a good reason to take the stressful job. I have seen all the time and prep work Chris Collinsworth puts into his broadcasts, it's probably less than coaches and GMs but it's still 60 hrs a week watching film and conducting interviews on the phone and in person.
WhoTom Posted August 21, 2018 Posted August 21, 2018 2 minutes ago, Soda Popinski said: I have seen all the time and prep work Chris Collinsworth puts into his broadcasts, it's probably less than coaches and GMs but it's still 60 hrs a week watching film and conducting interviews on the phone and in person. I'm sure there's a lot of prep time in broadcasting too. But of the three choices, that's the one I'd pick. 1
Soda Popinski Posted August 21, 2018 Posted August 21, 2018 3 minutes ago, WhoTom said: I'm sure there's a lot of prep time in broadcasting too. But of the three choices, that's the one I'd pick. definitely easier in the offseason and easier to get promotional gigs doing commercials and things like that.
smuvtalker Posted August 21, 2018 Posted August 21, 2018 Me personally, I'd take the commentating job without hesitation. I get to talk about the game I love AND get paid to do so. Granted it may not be as much as some of the higher level coaching positions, but it also doesn't include that stress either. I would also pick commentating over a F/O job, because we've all seen what happens to an organization when they continually stink up the joint and post losing record after losing record. Housekeeping within an organization often times includes a clean sweep of personnel from top to bottom, from the GM to the janitor... Give me the cushy commentating job 1000 times out of 1000 times please.
Gugny Posted August 21, 2018 Posted August 21, 2018 Coaching would probably require the least amount of time being invested. But I think commentating would be the best job.
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted August 21, 2018 Posted August 21, 2018 31 minutes ago, WhoTom said: Commentating would be the least stressful - you work fewer hours and there really aren't any repercussions for mistakes. Whether that's the best post-playing career or not depends on the player, but I choose lower stress unless there's a good reason to take the stressful job. ......good point...probably why many ex-HC's go to the booth and stay there......or even NFLN gigs.......
transient Posted August 21, 2018 Posted August 21, 2018 2 hours ago, Gugny said: Coaching would probably require the least amount of time being invested. I see you're a disciple of the Wrex Ryan coaching philosophy.
Recommended Posts