NewEra Posted August 19, 2018 Posted August 19, 2018 Because Andrew Luck is their starter and he isn’t entirely reliable 2
Gugny Posted August 19, 2018 Posted August 19, 2018 Looks like trouble in paradise. This is a head-scratcher.
Fixxxer Posted August 19, 2018 Posted August 19, 2018 maybe because the Seahawks OL will eventually get Wilson on IR.
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted August 19, 2018 Posted August 19, 2018 On 8/19/2018 at 2:19 PM, YoloinOhio said: Why and why Expand by Ryan Wilson -CBS SPORTS- Apr 21, 2018 Back in February, new Colts coach Frank Reich didn't sound like he was interested in parting ways with the 24-year-old. "There was a lot of evidence of winning football from Jacoby," he said, via Kevin Bowen of 1070 TheFan. "... I'm very encouraged and thankful he's on the roster." And last month a source told the Indianapolis Star's Chris Wade that the Colts had rebuffed two trade offers for Brissett, lending credence to Reich's original remarks. Also lending credence to Brissett staying put? General manager Chris Ballard's remarks on Friday when asked about keeping the young quarterback in Indy for the long haul. "He's committed, he's a great teammate, he's got juice, he holds people accountable, he holds himself accountable. I love Jacoby," Ballard said. "Jacoby Brissett is going to play in this league a long time. If I learned anything last year, it was the value of a backup quarterback who can get it done, and I think Jacoby can do that."
Doc Posted August 19, 2018 Posted August 19, 2018 On 8/19/2018 at 2:21 PM, NewEra said: Because Andrew Luck is their starter and he isn’t entirely reliable Expand I was looking at it more like "why would the Seahawks be will willing to trade a mid-2nd rounder for a QB when they have Wilson and tons of other needs?" 7
2020 Our Year For Sure Posted August 19, 2018 Posted August 19, 2018 I'd get good laffs if Brissett and Garoppolo both became FQBs and the Patsies are unable to find anyone for awhile once TB calls it quits 6
4merper4mer Posted August 19, 2018 Posted August 19, 2018 On 8/19/2018 at 2:29 PM, 2018 Our Year For Sure said: I'd get good laffs if Brissett and Garoppolo both became FQBs and the Patsies are unable to find anyone for awhile once TB calls it quits Expand True but it makes you wonder if this Danny Elfman guy they just drafted might be good too.
Clyde Smith Posted August 19, 2018 Posted August 19, 2018 Well they can have one of ours besides Allen for a second, I’ll be cool with that.
Green Lightning Posted August 19, 2018 Posted August 19, 2018 On 8/19/2018 at 2:29 PM, 2018 Our Year For Sure said: I'd get good laffs if Brissett and Garoppolo both became FQBs and the Patsies are unable to find anyone for awhile once TB calls it quits Expand That would be sweet.
Sammy Watkins' Rib Posted August 19, 2018 Posted August 19, 2018 On 8/19/2018 at 2:21 PM, NewEra said: Because Andrew Luck is their starter and he isn’t entirely reliable Expand Yeah, but why would Seattle even offer up a second rounder for Brissett? Guy isn't that good. Plus Wilson has been pretty durable. 1
NewEra Posted August 19, 2018 Posted August 19, 2018 On 8/19/2018 at 2:28 PM, Doc said: I was looking at it more like "why would the Seahawks be will willing to trade a mid-2nd rounder for a QB when they have Wilson and tons of other needs?" Expand Ahh my bad. Good question. Don’t have any idea
BillsFan130 Posted August 19, 2018 Posted August 19, 2018 On 8/19/2018 at 2:21 PM, NewEra said: Because Andrew Luck is their starter and he isn’t entirely reliable Expand Still though. They got what, 4 wins with brissett last year? If Andrew luck is out they are screwed either way. 1
/dev/null Posted August 19, 2018 Posted August 19, 2018 On 8/19/2018 at 2:28 PM, Doc said: I was looking at it more like "why would the Seahawks be will willing to trade a mid-2nd rounder for a QB when they have Wilson and tons of other needs?" Expand On 8/19/2018 at 2:55 PM, Sammy Watkins' Rib said: Yeah, but why would Seattle even offer up a second rounder for Brissett? Guy isn't that good. Plus Wilson has been pretty durable. Expand Very good question My guess is that with all the recent turnover in Seattle they are either A - looking for some insurance against the league keying on their franchise QB B - looking for some insurance against the possibility that the rest of the team carried Wilson
Over 29 years of fanhood Posted August 19, 2018 Posted August 19, 2018 On 8/19/2018 at 2:19 PM, YoloinOhio said: Why and why Expand Why and why indeed.... ?
HappyDays Posted August 19, 2018 Posted August 19, 2018 This is a story that gives both Colts and Seahawks fans a reason to be concerned. 1
ALF Posted August 19, 2018 Posted August 19, 2018 The good news is Garoppolo and Brissett are no longer in NE**
Augie Posted August 19, 2018 Posted August 19, 2018 On 8/19/2018 at 2:29 PM, 2018 Our Year For Sure said: I'd get good laffs if Brissett and Garoppolo both became FQBs and the Patsies are unable to find anyone for awhile once TB calls it quits Expand I think Belichick might just be laughing along with you (while throwing a single digit salute to Mr Kraft). 1
Recommended Posts