26CornerBlitz Posted August 17, 2018 Author Posted August 17, 2018 4 minutes ago, CuddyDark said: I said "OR." Did you miss I said or? I'm not too bright but or is a conjunction joining two things, anyway I think it is. Like I said I'm not too bright on those kind of things. A conjunction joins two independent thoughts. I never said I don't believe he did not send them. So that I'm really clear I believe McCoy sent them. I don't know if they went for free or if he paid them is what I said in the earlier post. No. What you posted is "McCoy met this woman. He purchased a house with or for or because of this woman. He moved in said House with woman, as a couple. He purchased jewelry for said woman at the same time woman says they discussed marriage. He paid or sent goons to remove jewelry from said woman while also beating said woman. All facts."
CuddyDark Posted August 17, 2018 Posted August 17, 2018 Just now, 26CornerBlitz said: No. What you posted is "McCoy met this woman. He purchased a house with or for or because of this woman. He moved in said House with woman, as a couple. He purchased jewelry for said woman at the same time woman says they discussed marriage. He paid or sent goons to remove jewelry from said woman while also beating said woman. All facts." Yes that's what I believe. He paid or sent goons. I never said I don't believe that.
26CornerBlitz Posted August 17, 2018 Author Posted August 17, 2018 Just now, CuddyDark said: Yes that's what I believe. He paid or sent goons. I never said I don't believe that. You said it was a fact. It is not.
Royale with Cheese Posted August 17, 2018 Posted August 17, 2018 8 minutes ago, CuddyDark said: I said "OR." Did you miss I said or? I'm not too bright but or is a conjunction joining two things, anyway I think it is. Like I said I'm not too bright on those kind of things. A conjunction joins two independent thoughts. I never said I don't believe he did not send them. So that I'm really clear I believe McCoy sent them. I don't know if they went for free or if he paid them is what I said in the earlier post. You specifically stated that HE did. You specifically stated it was a fact. How in the world can you not keep up with your own words? 2 minutes ago, CuddyDark said: Yes that's what I believe. He paid or sent goons. I never said I don't believe that. You said it was a fact and not just believe. I screen shot it for you because you seem to be very confused of your own words.
CuddyDark Posted August 17, 2018 Posted August 17, 2018 Just now, Royale with Cheese said: You specifically stated that HE did. You specifically stated it was a fact. How in the world can you not keep up with your own words? He sent them. Or paid them. Yes. The only thing taken at gunpoint was jewelry McCoy asked for previously.
Royale with Cheese Posted August 17, 2018 Posted August 17, 2018 Just now, CuddyDark said: He sent them. Or paid them. Yes. The only thing taken at gunpoint was jewelry McCoy asked for previously. So how is this a fact then?
CuddyDark Posted August 17, 2018 Posted August 17, 2018 (edited) 6 minutes ago, Royale with Cheese said: So how is this a fact then? So you're arguing I don't know if he paid them or if they went out of loyalty? Edited August 17, 2018 by CuddyDark
Foxx Posted August 17, 2018 Posted August 17, 2018 (edited) 18 minutes ago, CuddyDark said: I said "OR." Did you miss I said or? I'm not too bright but or is a conjunction joining two things, anyway I think it is. Like I said I'm not too bright on those kind of things. A conjunction joins two independent thoughts. ... you listed three items. two seperated by commas and the third item by the conjunction, 'or'. the way it reads, "I don't care if he gets away with it, if he did it, or if he does 20 years." implies that you don't care if any of those things happen. in the context of the way the sentence is structured, there is no delination of, 'if he did it then he should get 20 years'. in fact the context of the sentence structure implies just the opposite. anyhoo, i'm not trying to pile on you here. my suggestion was merely one of help. your burying yourself pretty good and it is usually good to stop before you are buried alive. just my two satoshi, take them for what they are worth. albeit not as much these days, lol.... 6 minutes ago, CuddyDark said: So you're arguing I don't know if he paid them or if they went out of loyalty? okay, now i'm piling on. you can't be that dense, can you? Edited August 17, 2018 by Foxx
Royale with Cheese Posted August 17, 2018 Posted August 17, 2018 Just now, CuddyDark said: So you're arguing I don't know if he paid them or if them went out of loyalty? No....no that's not what I'm arguing. Geezus. You claimed it was a fact he sent the goons. A fact meaning that it's indisputable. What you believe doesn't make something a fact. It could be a theory, speculation, an opinion etc.... Here's an example of a fact. Babe Ruth hit 714 homeruns. You can't argue that, it's fact. Saying Babe Ruth is the greatest hitter of all time isn't fact, it's an opinion. It's what you believe and there isn't one correct answer. When you say McCoy sent those goons and state it's fact, then you're saying it's not your belief, it's 100% confirmed he did. Do you now the differentce between fact and non-facts? 5 minutes ago, Foxx said: okay, now i'm piling on. you can't be that dense, can you?
Foxx Posted August 17, 2018 Posted August 17, 2018 5 minutes ago, Royale with Cheese said: ... Here's an example of a fact. Babe Ruth hit 714 homeruns. You can't argue that, it's fact. ... i dunno... it has been rumored that the Babe actually hit 715...... it's a crying shame when you don't know if you can even believe the record books.....
The Red King Posted August 17, 2018 Posted August 17, 2018 In CuddyDark's mind it's fact because the victim said so. See my prior post on white knight syndrome.
Royale with Cheese Posted August 17, 2018 Posted August 17, 2018 11 minutes ago, Foxx said: i dunno... it has been rumored that the Babe actually hit 715...... it's a crying shame when you don't know if you can even believe the record books..... You're going to make me come up with another example on a Friday afternoon? Fine. Fact. Michael Jordan won 6 NBA titles with the Chicago Bulls.
Foxx Posted August 17, 2018 Posted August 17, 2018 (edited) 13 minutes ago, Royale with Cheese said: You're going to make me come up with another example on a Friday afternoon? Fine. Fact. Michael Jordan won 6 NBA titles with the Chicago Bulls. lol. jus' screwing wit' ya. Edited August 17, 2018 by Foxx
26CornerBlitz Posted August 17, 2018 Author Posted August 17, 2018 Not arrested yet by Cuddy despite the iron clad facts that implicate him. Whew!
Doc Posted August 17, 2018 Posted August 17, 2018 4 hours ago, Mr. WEO said: They don't understand who the "most likely" culprit is. Help them, doc...! And right on cue... But since you asked, here’s a hint: “a little guy.”
BillsFan4 Posted August 17, 2018 Posted August 17, 2018 1 hour ago, CuddyDark said: He sent them. Or paid them. Yes. The only thing taken at gunpoint was jewelry McCoy asked for previously. 1 hour ago, CuddyDark said: So you're arguing I don't know if he paid them or if they went out of loyalty? Why does that automatically mean that McCoy sent and/or paid them? Why is that the only possible explanation? What if the girl was bragging about how much this jewelry was worth to the wrong person, or the wrong person overheard her talking about it and they decided to rob her? What if it was one of her own friends or acquaintances who set her up? What if it was just a random robbery and she is lying about what this robber said in order to try and capatilize monetarily on this situation? What if if one of mccoy’s acquaintances knew about the jewelry and set up this robbery without McCoy having any knowledge of it? I mean, guys buy jewelry for girls all the time and if they break up, many times want that jewelry back. That is pretty standard stuff. It in no way automatically means McCoy set her up. He may or may not have. We simply do not know. But as of now there seems to be little to no proof that he did, otherwise he’d have been charged already.
Mr. WEO Posted August 18, 2018 Posted August 18, 2018 4 hours ago, Doc said: And right on cue... But since you asked, here’s a hint: “a little guy.” Gotta be a little guy to shimmy down that sheet-rope from your bedroom, right doc?
RocCityRoller Posted August 18, 2018 Posted August 18, 2018 Every OG knows you do not let a baby girl looking for a sugar daddy live in the house. Come on Shady, for a wannabe player you are naive. The jewelry is the payoff. Everyone knows this. This should be NFL rookie intro 'how to avoid gold digging hoes' symposium topic one. Get her an apartment, get her a cheap house, invite her out. Do not let her live with you. Rookie mistake.
Doc Posted August 18, 2018 Posted August 18, 2018 8 hours ago, Mr. WEO said: Gotta be a little guy to shimmy down that sheet-rope from your bedroom, right doc? Naw, it would make far more sense for Shady to send “a little guy” to commit armed robbery, right WEO?
Mr. WEO Posted August 18, 2018 Posted August 18, 2018 3 hours ago, Doc said: Naw, it would make far more sense for Shady to send “a little guy” to commit armed robbery, right WEO? McCoy is maybe 5'11". Her son is probably taller than him. But the son is still the most likely suspect...
Recommended Posts