Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, Mat68 said:

 Friday night when Allen has Coleman tracking the deep ball instead of Foster the conversation may be mute. 

 

Really hope they have those 2 on the field at the same time.

 

I bet Daboll does, too.

Posted
4 hours ago, JohnC said:

Maybe bold for you but not for me.  I would gladly leave this board if I were wrong. On this issue I am supremely confident. Take my post and put it in your pocket. If I am wrong you can bring it to may attention so that I can act on my departure if it comes to pass. 

 

Didn't say you should, but absolute and definitive statements about things that have yet to pass like that are really ridiculous.

Posted (edited)
On 8/11/2018 at 6:33 AM, Dr. Who said:

Agreed. And Transplant was so against Allen before the draft. Open mind is a good thing, folks.

 

Absolutely loathed the pick.

 

I wanted Mayfield then Darnold then Rosen or Jackson.

 

Analytics absolutely hated our pick. 

 

But this was a true scouting pick. And after we drafted him and I took the time to dive deep into Allen's history and film from middle school on up (some post-scouting), I got more and more excited about a kid that just has one of the most unique stories you're going to see for a top 10 NFL QB prospect.

Edited by transplantbillsfan
  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
16 minutes ago, ScottLaw said:

If that is a screen shot of the first deep ball of the game from Allen then I completely disagree.

 

It was an inaccurate throw out of bounds. 

It is and you’re right. Allen led him right out of bounds. Would have taken a contortionist to get two feet in based on where the ball was delivered.

Posted
11 minutes ago, JoPar_v2 said:

It is and you’re right. Allen led him right out of bounds. Would have taken a contortionist to get two feet in based on where the ball was delivered.

Agreed, though his later attempt was pretty much perfect. Maybe he was too amped up on that first one, who knows. When seen from the other angle it wasn’t really catchable in bounds, though. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
28 minutes ago, transplantbillsfan said:

 

Absolutely loathed the pick.

 

I wanted Mayfield then Darnold then Rosen or Jackson.

 

Analytics absolutely hated our pick. 

 

But this was a true scouting pick. And after we drafted him and I took the time to dive deep into Allen's history and film from middle school on up (some post-scouting), I got more and more excited about a kid that just has one of the most unique stories you're going to see for a top 10 NFL QB prospect.

 

You weren't alone as I'd say about 90% of the board hated the idea of drafting Allen before the draft. Right after the Bills selected him most Bills fans here acted like they were gut shot with that pick.

 

I rejoiced when the Bills drafted him over Rosen as I had done some extensive research pre-draft on all this years QB's and fell in love with what Allen brings and not just with the arm. He wasn't the most polished QB of the bunch but had the highest ceiling. In his final year at Wyoming, he played with a bunch of rookies and carried them to an 8-5 record and a bowl win.

 

The biggest drawback everyone had with him was with his accuracy issues and then you realize he only played a full two seasons in college which should allow him to improve those accuracy issues over time. If you take the time to research it so many great QB's started out with a bad completion percentage only to improve over time.

 

Joe Montana started out with a 42.4 % and left ND with a 54.2 %. While finishing his NFL career with a 63.2%. Brett Farve was another with a horrific completion percentage in his first year at S Miss with a 40.7 % to see it rise to 54.5 in his senior year. Then finished his NFL career with a 62.0. 

 

Allen's accuracy issues mostly revolve around his footwork and he has worked very hard to improve that since he left college.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

Wow, even Lolphin fans are impressed. 

 

https://finheaven.com/threads/jets-bills-draft-qbs.347076/#post-7670647

 

I watched Josh Allen's dropbacks from last night's game and I'm going to be honest:

He played well. Everyone is laughing at that play where he got clowned on on the 4th and 3, but he made some real nice throws. One of his deep shots to Foster was juuuust a bit outside (but catchable), but the other one was pretty much on the money and Foster just short-armed it.

Posted
2 hours ago, transplantbillsfan said:

 

Didn't say you should, but absolute and definitive statements about things that have yet to pass like that are really ridiculous.

I will again state my position: I am absolutely confident that Allen will not be as accurate a passer as Brees or Brady. Even it Allen's career is barely starting I will again state with absolute confidence that Allen will not be as accurate as the two HOF qbs I mentioned. 

 

As another poster stated you hated the Allen pick. And you acknowledged that you had four other qbs in this draft rated ahead of him. Now you are touting him as being capable of being more accurate than two of the most accurate passers in the history of the game. That makes no sense. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, JohnC said:

I will again state my position: I am absolutely confident that Allen will not be as accurate a passer as Brees or Brady. Even it Allen's career is barely starting I will again state with absolute confidence that Allen will not be as accurate as the two HOF qbs I mentioned. 

 

As another poster stated you hated the Allen pick. And you acknowledged that you had four other qbs in this draft rated ahead of him. Now you are touting him as being capable of being more accurate than two of the most accurate passers in the history of the game. That makes no sense. 

Those are 2 of the most accurate QBs ever.  To expect that is ridiculous.  Heck Mayfield doesnt have that expectation.  No after seeing him play he is not inaccurate.  He is the purest thrower Buffalo may have ever had.  If Buffalo can coach him up and get him up to speed with the mental side he could be a franchise qb.

Posted
14 minutes ago, JohnC said:

I will again state my position: I am absolutely confident that Allen will not be as accurate a passer as Brees or Brady. Even it Allen's career is barely starting I will again state with absolute confidence that Allen will not be as accurate as the two HOF qbs I mentioned. 

 

As another poster stated you hated the Allen pick. And you acknowledged that you had four other qbs in this draft rated ahead of him. Now you are touting him as being capable of being more accurate than two of the most accurate passers in the history of the game. That makes no sense. 

Not exactly going out on a limb to state that Allen won’t be as accurate as two supremely accurate HOF QBs. Not sure why some are making that out to be some bold proclamation. We already know that the odds are against it. He can still be a franchise NFL QB though. 

Posted
22 minutes ago, JohnC said:

I will again state my position: I am absolutely confident that Allen will not be as accurate a passer as Brees or Brady. Even it Allen's career is barely starting I will again state with absolute confidence that Allen will not be as accurate as the two HOF qbs I mentioned. 

 

 

John

 

We heard you, and we get that you feel that way.   And I'm not here to argue with you, because you're entitled to your opinion. 

 

Most of the recent comments in response to you have simply been saying that we aren't willing to state with absolute confidence much of anything about how the guy will perform several years from now.  We aren't arguing with you, although we do wonder how one can be so certain about that.   

 

Tom Brady was a MUCH worse prospect coming out of college than Allen and if asked, MILLIONS of football fans would have said with absolute confidence that he would never become one of the greatest QBs in the history of the game.  The absolute confidence of those millions of fans had absolutely nothing to do with what Brady became, and your absolute confidence, right or wrong, has nothing to do with what Allen will become.  

14 minutes ago, Boatdrinks said:

Not exactly going out on a limb to state that Allen won’t be as accurate as two supremely accurate HOF QBs. Not sure why some are making that out to be some bold proclamation. We already know that the odds are against it. He can still be a franchise NFL QB though. 

Odds are one thing; certainty in predicting the future is quite another. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted

Is it just me or is it only Bill's fans that want Allen to succeed. I mean obviously we want a franchise QB, but I feel like the entire NFL wants him to fail, even some  analysts refer to him and start laughing like hes a joke. One podcast actually said " only Bill's fans would be excited about a qb that isn't good at throwing a football" and he got the lowest grade on pre season performance out of rookie QBs. Lamar looked lost and no confidence when it came to passing, but of course he looked awesome scrambling and everyone thinks hes the future of the ravens. I dont get it.

Posted
8 minutes ago, Norcalbillsfan said:

Is it just me or is it only Bill's fans that want Allen to succeed. I mean obviously we want a franchise QB, but I feel like the entire NFL wants him to fail, even some  analysts refer to him and start laughing like hes a joke. One podcast actually said " only Bill's fans would be excited about a qb that isn't good at throwing a football" and he got the lowest grade on pre season performance out of rookie QBs. Lamar looked lost and no confidence when it came to passing, but of course he looked awesome scrambling and everyone thinks hes the future of the ravens. I dont get it.

 

...realistically, the "17 year drought" galvanized the national urinalists to use Bflo as their dart board....and a cursory review of the band of misfits, unqualifieds, "over the hill gang with new tires", etc calling the shots, rightfully so...the organization post Polian was "F Troop" IMO......despite the "playoff schneid" being broken, they are and will continue to be luke warm to the "Mc Trio (McBeane, McD & McDaboll)".....I happen to like the trio as potentially equal to if not better than the Polian era and could give a rat's azz what the hell they think....

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, JohnC said:

I will again state my position: I am absolutely confident that Allen will not be as accurate a passer as Brees or Brady. Even it Allen's career is barely starting I will again state with absolute confidence that Allen will not be as accurate as the two HOF qbs I mentioned. 

 

As another poster stated you hated the Allen pick. And you acknowledged that you had four other qbs in this draft rated ahead of him. Now you are touting him as being capable of being more accurate than two of the most accurate passers in the history of the game. That makes no sense. 

 

Capable, yes.

 

Absolutely will OR will not, absolutely ridiculous--and that, in fact, is what makes no sense.

Edited by transplantbillsfan
Posted
4 hours ago, ScottLaw said:

If that is a screen shot of the first deep ball of the game from Allen then I completely disagree.

 

It was an inaccurate throw out of bounds. 

 

It was and how is it out of bounds when clearly he is IN BOUNDS with ball in hand ans one foot down. 

 

The WR drifted on his route. 

3 hours ago, ScottLaw said:

Yea.

 

The second deep ball should've been a TD. The first one was a bad throw out of bounds.

 

Not sure why people can't just call it like it is instead of fabricate things to make him look better. 

 

I dont have an end zone view. If I did I would be able to tell when Foster started Drifting his route ans where the Ball was delivered. But as I said I dont have endzone view of it. 

Posted
3 hours ago, Boatdrinks said:

Not exactly going out on a limb to state that Allen won’t be as accurate as two supremely accurate HOF QBs. Not sure why some are making that out to be some bold proclamation. We already know that the odds are against it. He can still be a franchise NFL QB though. 

You concisely state my position. I'm not diminishing Allen as a prospect. i like him and believe he will be a good franchise qb for us. As you described it I'm not making a bold prediction as much as I am stating the obvious. The circular discussions I seem to be having has run its course. There isn't much I can add to what I have already said. 

Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, Nihilarian said:

You weren't alone as I'd say about 90% of the board hated the idea of drafting Allen before the draft. Right after the Bills selected him most Bills fans here acted like they were gut shot with that pick.

 

I rejoiced when the Bills drafted him over Rosen as I had done some extensive research pre-draft on all this years QB's and fell in love with what Allen brings and not just with the arm. He wasn't the most polished QB of the bunch but had the highest ceiling. In his final year at Wyoming, he played with a bunch of rookies and carried them to an 8-5 record and a bowl win.

 

The biggest drawback everyone had with him was with his accuracy issues and then you realize he only played a full two seasons in college which should allow him to improve those accuracy issues over time. If you take the time to research it so many great QB's started out with a bad completion percentage only to improve over time.

 

Joe Montana started out with a 42.4 % and left ND with a 54.2 %. While finishing his NFL career with a 63.2%. Brett Farve was another with a horrific completion percentage in his first year at S Miss with a 40.7 % to see it rise to 54.5 in his senior year. Then finished his NFL career with a 62.0. 

 

Allen's accuracy issues mostly revolve around his footwork and he has worked very hard to improve that since he left college.

 

 

Here's the problem, from a research perspective. 

His completion percentage was still below 50 and he was against a vanilla D. 

You can cherry pick all the great QB's you like, but you really need to look at a larger sample size. There haven't been many, if any, QB's who have been able to improve upon a sub 60 per cent college completion percentage in the pros who were drafted in the last decade. Your looking at exceptions, not likely outcomes. That was the reasoning against drafting Allen, as a QB needs to hit at least 60 per cent to be able to start in the league (in today's pass happy era) and most rookies see an immediate drop in completion percentage in the NFL, and sometimes it never goes back up.

I get that your excited, but if you want to argue stats you can't just cherry pick from the greats who played during a time when passes were less frequent due to different pass interference rules.There are very good reasons to be concerned with his accuracy, and people who are concerned are doing there research. 

Edited by MURPHD6
Posted
3 hours ago, Mat68 said:

Those are 2 of the most accurate QBs ever.  To expect that is ridiculous.  Heck Mayfield doesnt have that expectation.  No after seeing him play he is not inaccurate.  He is the purest thrower Buffalo may have ever had.  If Buffalo can coach him up and get him up to speed with the mental side he could be a franchise qb.

Since Allen was in the draft pool with the other high end prospects I considered him to be not only a legitimate franchise qb prospect but beyond that a very good franchise qb prospect. It's not a slight to not believe that he will be as accurate as two of the most accurate qbs in modern history. I really don't see what the controversy is about. 

Posted
16 minutes ago, JohnC said:

Since Allen was in the draft pool with the other high end prospects I considered him to be not only a legitimate franchise qb prospect but beyond that a very good franchise qb prospect. It's not a slight to not believe that he will be as accurate as two of the most accurate qbs in modern history. I really don't see what the controversy is about. 

How was Brees his first few years?  Franchise QB material?

×
×
  • Create New...