GaryPinC Posted August 11, 2018 Posted August 11, 2018 4 hours ago, Alphadawg7 said: Good points, but we got rid of TT cuz Cleveland parted with a premium pick for him. Right, I just think the FO had much more in mind when they made that decision. If they truly wanted to develop a rookie slowly, keeping TT made the most sense to me. 1
billsredneck1 Posted August 11, 2018 Posted August 11, 2018 11 hours ago, Wagon Circler said: Peterman decisive. McCarren and Allen indecisive. Guess we were watching different games. Peterman was great. We will see aj against some ones so we'll see how that goes and hope he doesn't turn into getsackedalot.
Fr. Jerk Posted August 11, 2018 Posted August 11, 2018 Ok, the OP wants Peterman to start. I was under the impression its about who McDermott wants to start.
The Process Posted August 11, 2018 Posted August 11, 2018 I'm elated that we have 3 QBs that have the skills to come from behind when needed. I think Allen's improv to this point is underrated. He's a cross between Big Ben and discount daaaable-check.
Alphadawg7 Posted August 11, 2018 Posted August 11, 2018 3 hours ago, GaryPinC said: Right, I just think the FO had much more in mind when they made that decision. If they truly wanted to develop a rookie slowly, keeping TT made the most sense to me. I agree and felt that way too. And I think they probably would have kept TT (as opposed to cutting him) as a bridge if they couldn’t trade him for something. But getting a draft pick, especially such a premium pick, was a no brainer since they had made their mind up to go after a high pick QB in the draft.
Recommended Posts