Juror#8 Posted August 10, 2018 Posted August 10, 2018 3 minutes ago, LaDexter said: But then how would LBJ arm Israel and bill the US taxpayer for it??? LBJ needed a war, an endless war, to steal our weapons and give them to ISRAEL.... https://www.cia.gov/library/center-for-the-study-of-intelligence/csi-publications/csi-studies/studies/vol49no1/html_files/arab_israeli_war_1.html "Helms was awakened at 3:00 in the morning on 5 June by a call from the CIA Operations Center. The Foreign Broadcast Information Service had picked up reports that Israel had launched its attack. (OCI soon concluded that the Israelis— contrary to their claims—had fired first.) President Johnson was gratified that because of CIA analyses and Helms's tip, he could inform congressional leaders later in the day that he had been expecting Israel's move" Then Zionist Traitor LBJ got on TV and told the American people that Israel was attacked and was just defending itself... You quoted “me.” Well, you quoted a sentence I don’t recall typing. Where did that quote come from? I’ve had three glasses of Blantons but that’s enough to make me forget typing **** I don’t think.
DC Tom Posted August 10, 2018 Posted August 10, 2018 1 minute ago, Juror#8 said: You quoted “me.” Well, you quoted a sentence I don’t recall typing. Where did that quote come from? I’ve had three glasses of Blantons but that’s enough to make me forget typing **** I don’t think. Don't encourage him. He's an ass. Let the professional ass-responders like me deal with him. Wait...that didn't sound right... 5
3rdnlng Posted August 10, 2018 Posted August 10, 2018 1 hour ago, The_Dude said: Here's my NUMBER ONE rule for warfare. It supersedes all others. If you can't avoid a war, you have to win it. Now, we could have and should have avoided Vietnam. Depending on the day I may give you a different answer. But, if you get into a war, even a war you shouldn't have, you have to win. You cannot withdraw. I can point to countless examples, but after we failed to properly win the Korean War (we should have nuked China then and crushed them) we had to win Nam and didn't. The result embolden enemies of America. 'If we persist, they'll run away.' Beirut in 83 emboldened them even more. You have to win the wars you fight on your terms when possible. We paid dearly for not doing so in Nam and Korea. I've honestly only read two books on Nam, and one of them was written from the Soviet perspective and included fascinating primary sources. I have an obsession with winning wars. That's because I was in one. A small one, but I was in one. And I fought. And, I think the goal of each generation is to try and gain a little peace for the next generation. I don't want my kids fighting in the deserts of Arabia, or the Jungles of SE Asia. But when fights come, you cannot back down. You have to win. Honestly, if I could go back to the end of WWII I'd beg Truman to have handled the Soviets then, and broken them up into numerous countries. I'd have advocated for letting MacArthur nuke whatever he wanted to nuke in China. We should have never accepted Nuclear Proliferation. Yet we did. The 20th century was brutal on everybody. It is what it is, and we must move forward. But damn, I wish we won Korea and Vietnam. Anyways, you make some fascinating points and as a guy obsessed with history it was enjoyable. But I do believe we could have, and should have won Vietnam. ...I like Jews. Theyve never bothered me. And the fact they keep the Muslims busy makes me appreciate them even more. And by being an anti-Zionist what do you oppose? Zionism was not a reaction to the diaspora, but it was a desire for a Jewish home -- let them have a home! It was other powers that gave them Israel. Sheesh, nutty guy. Conservatives fail to blitz black areas with campaigning because they tactically concede the demographic without a fight. I say, fight for the black vote. Traditional conservatism is way healthier than handouts. According to a recent poll, Trump's support among blacks has doubled in the last year. He's doing what you are asking for and not conceding that demographic. The growing economy is making it possible for our country to reduce handouts. Pretty good job by the president, eh?
reddogblitz Posted August 10, 2018 Posted August 10, 2018 6 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: According to a recent poll, Trump's support among blacks has doubled in the last year. He's doing what you are asking for and not conceding that demographic. The growing economy is making it possible for our country to reduce handouts. Pretty good job by the president, eh? If Trump did it's BAD. It's not complicated.
row_33 Posted August 10, 2018 Posted August 10, 2018 All those greedy people wanting a job and some money and paying less taxes
Juror#8 Posted August 10, 2018 Posted August 10, 2018 1 hour ago, DC Tom said: Don't encourage him. He's an ass. Let the professional ass-responders like me deal with him. Wait...that didn't sound right... Hahahaha!!!! That’s even funnier because I’m drunk.
/dev/null Posted August 10, 2018 Posted August 10, 2018 2 minutes ago, Juror#8 said: Hahahaha!!!! That’s even funnier because I’m drunk. I'd say you're a little early but then I remembered that you're probably on Colored People Time
Juror#8 Posted August 10, 2018 Posted August 10, 2018 14 minutes ago, /dev/null said: I'd say you're a little early but then I remembered that you're probably on Colored People Time Cp time, baby!!! But that would mean I’d start my 5:00 happy hour drinking at 11:00 pm. But it’s 7:30 on a Friday and I have a new “man cave.” So it’s bourbon and “Game of Thrones” binging.
/dev/null Posted August 10, 2018 Posted August 10, 2018 6 minutes ago, Juror#8 said: Cp time, baby!!! But that would mean I’d start my 5:00 happy hour drinking at 11:00 pm. But it’s 7:30 on a Friday and I have a new “man cave.” So it’s bourbon and “Game of Thrones” binging.
row_33 Posted August 10, 2018 Posted August 10, 2018 (edited) 2 hours ago, Juror#8 said: Read about how Nixon sabotaged one of the peace accords that could have brought Nam to an end in 68ish just so he could win political office. Brilliant man. An interesting political actor. Irredeemably corrupt like I said on page two in my rebuke of “The Dude’s” post. Not sure there’s ever been self-serving treachery like that, from a political actor, before or since. 1. It was seen as another cynical gimmick by LBJ to pretend for peace talks, yet again and going nowhere 2. There was never a move by the North to ever give up its steel desire to overtake the South, not for a second 3. The talks when they began were an endless disaster, couldn’t even agree on the table shape for a long time and it crawled when it even began, and see point 2 for the farce it was as the North was never showing up in good faith. 4. Every time the GOP wins it has to be a stolen election caused by treason and horrible evil actions. Whaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhh...... lost again.... Edited August 10, 2018 by row_33
Joe Miner Posted August 10, 2018 Posted August 10, 2018 7 minutes ago, Juror#8 said: Cp time, baby!!! But that would mean I’d start my 5:00 happy hour drinking at 11:00 pm. But it’s 7:30 on a Friday and I have a new “man cave.” So it’s bourbon and “Game of Thrones” binging. Bourbon time. Best time of the day. Whatcha drinkin?
/dev/null Posted August 11, 2018 Posted August 11, 2018 11 minutes ago, Joe Miner said: Bourbon time. Best time of the day. Whatcha drinkin? J#8 is black so either Colt 45 or Hennesey
Juror#8 Posted August 11, 2018 Posted August 11, 2018 1 hour ago, row_33 said: 1. It was seen as another cynical gimmick by LBJ to pretend for peace talks, yet again and going nowhere 2. There was never a move by the North to ever give up its steel desire to overtake the South, not for a second 3. The talks when they began were an endless disaster, couldn’t even agree on the table shape for a long time and it crawled when it even began, and see point 2 for the farce it was as the North was never showing up in good faith. 4. Every time the GOP wins it has to be a stolen election caused by treason and horrible evil actions. Whaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhh...... lost again.... Huh? What does his have to do with Nixon winning the office? The talks you were mentioning starting crappy, was resolved after a few weeks, and was resolved when some foreign power (can’t remember) suggested a round table. But you’re ahead of yourself ... what about the ****ty tone of the proposed peace process had anything to do with Nixon’s responsibility not to meddle in foreign affairs while he was still not an empowered elected official? There is a word for that. But I’ll let you put some color to it. Anyway, it may have been a Logan Act issue, maybe not. Not going going to relitigate it. What I do know is that Nixon endeavored to stop the South Koreans from negotiating until he was in office for his own political gain. In the meantime, soldiers were being slaughtered. Please dont countenance that noxiousness with ****ty platitudes. 48 minutes ago, /dev/null said: J#8 is black so either Colt 45 or Hennesey Dude I only drink Henny when I’m watching “Good Morning Black America.” Its the new show on b.e.t. that starts at noon. 1 hour ago, Joe Miner said: Bourbon time. Best time of the day. Whatcha drinkin? Blantons pretty much exclusively. If im drinking rye, I like Sagamore (Maryland rye) or Bullitt Rye or Knob Creek.
/dev/null Posted August 11, 2018 Posted August 11, 2018 6 minutes ago, Juror#8 said: Dude I only drink Henny when I’m watching “Good Morning Black America.” Its the new show on b.e.t. that starts at noon. Breakfast is the most important meal
Joe Miner Posted August 11, 2018 Posted August 11, 2018 17 minutes ago, Juror#8 said: 17 minutes ago, Juror#8 said: Blantons pretty much exclusively. If im drinking rye, I like Sagamore (Maryland rye) or Bullitt Rye or Knob Creek. Nice. Good stuff. Got some EH Taylor small batch tonight. Cheers
3rdnlng Posted August 11, 2018 Posted August 11, 2018 21 minutes ago, Juror#8 said: Huh? What does his have to do with Nixon winning the office? The talks you were mentioning starting crappy, was resolved after a few weeks, and was resolved when some foreign power (can’t remember) suggested a round table. But you’re ahead of yourself ... what about the ****ty tone of the proposed peace process had anything to do with Nixon’s responsibility not to meddle in foreign affairs while he was still not an empowered elected official? There is a word for that. But I’ll let you put some color to it. Anyway, it may have been a Logan Act issue, maybe not. Not going going to relitigate it. What I do know is that Nixon endeavored to stop the South Koreans from negotiating until he was in office for his own political gain. In the meantime, soldiers were being slaughtered. Please dont countenance that noxiousness with ****ty platitudes. Dude I only drink Henny when I’m watching “Good Morning Black America.” Its the new show on b.e.t. that starts at noon. Blantons pretty much exclusively. If im drinking rye, I like Sagamore (Maryland rye) or Bullitt Rye or Knob Creek. No wonder it took so long to negotiate a deal. 1
row_33 Posted August 11, 2018 Posted August 11, 2018 There has never been a credible source that Nixon halted any alleged “peace talks”. LBJ and his goons would stoop to anything to make him look good.
Recommended Posts