Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
22 minutes ago, Chandler#81 said:

LB. I was QB and we were working on a gadget play in practice -shotgun inside handoff sweep right. I delay then peel out in the left flat. RB pulls up and throws back across the field to me. Neither of us saw each other til the last split second and I instinctively lowered my head, bracing for impact. Knocked out 2 of my LB’s teeth..

me? a broken neck.

 

Ouch!  -Brutal....  That's why I don't see how you can evenly enforce this.... So much of what you do out there is reacting to the laws of physics.

Posted
17 minutes ago, #34fan said:

 

:lol: Nah, our coach's last name was Murphy... He was a true sadist, though.

We had a football coach who was a science teacher vietnam vet in late 70s, early 80s who would lose it every once in a while... soft spoken until he would, felt for the guy but everyone backed off when he did... 

Posted
29 minutes ago, North Buffalo said:

We had a football coach who was a science teacher vietnam vet in late 70s, early 80s who would lose it every once in a while... soft spoken until he would, felt for the guy but everyone backed off when he did... 

 

Ours was a substitute math and science teacher...  Since he sucked at both, he would let kids sit in class and read whatever they wanted, as long  as they didn't talk..

 

As a coach, he thought the best place for a helmet was under a face-mask.

Posted (edited)

As it says in the article, people are freaking out about this for no reason.

 

And it's not like they have a choice. If they don't make rules like this, the game will likely be caught up in major legal troubles and the changing of society's mores. Boxing was huge not all that long ago. Now a lot of society considers it overviolent.

 

Entertainment must change with society.

Edited by Thurman#1
Posted
2 hours ago, oldmanfan said:

See what you hit.  Get back to basics.

 

I played football into HS, and I LOVED leading with my head, but it was face mask first. I must have a thick skull or something, because lots of targets got “dinged” while I never felt a thing. My kids were the same way. (Our family has “deceptively large” heads, meaning we are the only people wearing the different color helmet in whitewater rafting, etc.)

 

I played rugby in college, which I think in many ways is safer because you don’t act like a lethal missile launching head first. But ONE TIME was all it took. A guy broke loose down the far sideline and I had about a 30 yard sprint to push him OB. Dove head first to push him, he tried to cut back behind me and I took his thigh, as we’re both in full sprint, to the top of my head. Bad news! 

 

I came to in the grass with our coach standing over me yelling to get back on the field. (In rugby you had to be ON the field for them to stop play.) He had to point so I could find the field. (Crazy now that I think of it, I should have been immobilized on the spot!) I spent a steamy summer in a neck brace, and still have a tingle up the back of my head if I touch one little spot on the back of my neck/skull. They said it’s  scar tissue on the nerve at the base of my skull. And I was lucky! 

 

Yes, see what you hit! EVERY time! 

 

This just may explain some of the stuff I pollute this board with. It’s dain bramage! 

Posted (edited)
5 hours ago, #34fan said:

 

Putting your head down is kind of how your body naturally protects your eyes and vital organs from impact.

 

To me its like trying to tell a shark not to roll its eyes back when it attacks... Eons of natural selection has perfected this reflex... Shazier's injury, as awful as it was, is just

 

another "wrong place, wrong time" event we have to face sometimes... He was trying to hit a moving target, and something went wrong.

 

What an absolute load of crap. The human head and neck was not designed to take that kind of punishment or deliver a shot with the crown of the head as the impact point. There is no reflex action like a shark rolling its eyes, because our bodies weren't designed to run head-first at full speed into an object.

 

Just stop with this 'pussification of football' macho doomsday bullcrap. It doesn't make you a man to break your neck, especially when the far more effective (and intelligent) option to tackle is to keep your head up and use the parts of your body that can actually absorb the impact. Actually, I think it makes you a moron to use your head as the tip of a missile.

Edited by Koko78
  • Like (+1) 3
Posted
5 hours ago, #34fan said:

 

Putting your head down is kind of how your body naturally protects your eyes and vital organs from impact.

 

To me its like trying to tell a shark not to roll its eyes back when it attacks... Eons of natural selection has perfected this reflex... Shazier's injury, as awful as it was, is just

 

another "wrong place, wrong time" event we have to face sometimes... He was trying to hit a moving target, and something went wrong.

 

 

I'd argue leading with the shoulder is how your body naturally protects eyes and vital organs. 

 

But nearly every sport has sport-specific movements players are trained in that counter their natural instincts. You weren't born wearing a helmet, nor did cavemen evolve wearing a facemask. But that's how football is played, which is why players have been taught (mostly successfully) to lead with the facemask in a tackle, as that's the safest way to tackle with your head involved.

Posted (edited)

 

1 hour ago, Koko78 said:

 

What an absolute load of crap. The human head and neck was not designed to take that kind of punishment or deliver a shot with the crown of the head as the impact point. There is no reflex action like a shark rolling its eyes, because our bodies weren't designed to run head-first at full speed into an object.

 

Just stop with this 'pussification of football' macho doomsday bullcrap. It doesn't make you a man to break your neck, especially when the far more effective (and intelligent) option to tackle is to keep your head up and use the parts of your body that can actually absorb the impact. Actually, I think it makes you a moron to use your head as the tip of a missile.

 

I was starting to wonder when the "safe space" and padded playground-loving geeks of the board would show up to tell us all what terrible people we are

 

for suggesting that the best way to avoid a football injury is not to play the effing sport to begin with...  No one says you have to.... Fact is, there's absolutely no

 

safe way to run full speed into any object in any frickin' position... But don't tell that to the morons who would have you believe there's a safe way to bring down

 

a 250 pound animal running  toward you at 20 miles per hour :lol:    Don't like the risks, don't play the game... How hard is that?

 

 

 

Edited by #34fan
Posted
8 hours ago, #34fan said:

 

 

I was starting to wonder when the "safe space" and padded playground-loving geeks of the board would show up to tell us all what terrible people we are

 

for suggesting that the best way to avoid a football injury is not to play the effing sport to begin with...  No one says you have to.... Fact is, there's absolutely no

 

safe way to run full speed into any object in any frickin' position... But don't tell that to the morons who would have you believe there's a safe way to bring down

 

a 250 pound animal running  toward you at 20 miles per hour :lol:    Don't like the risks, don't play the game... How hard is that?

 

 

 

There is no absolutely safe way to play football but there certainly is ways which are safer than others. I’m sure you understand that but just need something to B word about. 

 

Do I think it will ruin the game? I hope not. I do think it might make betting on the games less enjoyable because the refs will now have even more control. That could hurt the buisness model, depending on how it is officiated. 

Posted
9 hours ago, #34fan said:

 

 

I was starting to wonder when the "safe space" and padded playground-loving geeks of the board would show up to tell us all what terrible people we are

 

for suggesting that the best way to avoid a football injury is not to play the effing sport to begin with...  No one says you have to.... Fact is, there's absolutely no

 

safe way to run full speed into any object in any frickin' position... But don't tell that to the morons who would have you believe there's a safe way to bring down

 

a 250 pound animal running  toward you at 20 miles per hour :lol:    Don't like the risks, don't play the game... How hard is that?

 

Yeah, I mean Kevin Everett was such a man when he broke his neck by using his helmet as a weapon instead of using proper tackling form.

 

But hey, it makes you feel all macho that his career was ended by being a dumbass, so that's all that matters. We certainly can't reduce your enjoyment of football by making sure that players can actually walk off the field.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Koko78 said:

 

Yeah, I mean Kevin Everett was such a man when he broke his neck by using his helmet as a weapon instead of using proper tackling form.

 

But hey, it makes you feel all macho that his career was ended by being a dumbass, so that's all that matters. We certainly can't reduce your enjoyment of football by making sure that players can actually walk off the field.

 

The crown of your head is the hardest part of your cranium. -Even if you don't know that, your body does... Muscles, and fluid-filled discs in the neck are there to absorb the impact... Unfortunately, they're not made of titanium, so there's only so much shock they can absorb without damage.

 

I am 100% all-in for safer football... What I am not for, is a 15 yard flag coming out every time a RB lowers his head to grind for a 1st down.

 

 

Posted

I think the confusion around the new rule is what's going to be detrimental to the game. I've seen a number of reports stating that teams are very unclear on how the rule will be imposed and how coaches can teach players how to adjust with the new rule in mind. And I think it's going to be difficult for officials to get right during games. Plays happen so fast, we see it all the time, a penalty is called but after seeing the replay, it's clear that it wasn't a penalty and the official had a bad angle to view it from and made a bad call. I can see that happening a lot here. A ball-carrier hits the seam and gets hit by a linebacker who drops his head past the ball-carrier's right hip and drives his shoulder into his midsection for a typical form tackle. The official on the right side sees that the helmet avoided contact but the official on the left side just sees a player who dropped his helmet to make a tackle, so does he throw a flag because he's uncertain if the helmet was involved or not? And then the zebras convene for a 3-hour conference (seems like it, anyway) to try and get the call right and still get it wrong. I think early on it's going to be rough and they're going to get it wrong quite a bit. As the season goes on, the hope would be that they get better at recognizing it and don't need to hold up the game with their little meetings and whatnot. It works both ways too, an offensive player can't drop their helmet and drive into another player, but, as someone already pointed out, when a ball-carrier has defenders closing in on him, what's he going to do? He's going to (usually) wrap both arms around the ball and get low, and there's going to be incidental contact with his helmet. That's the thing with this rule. How can they define when it's just part of the play or when it's intentional? That's why this rule sucks and that's why it's not going to go well, at least early on.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
18 hours ago, quinnearlysghost88 said:

Players have managed to play the game for decades without launching at opponents head-first like a missile to bring them down. This needed to be curbed a long time ago. 

So true. Maybe go back and teach players the correct way to tackle. With your arms. The NFL has become pinball with players bouncing off each other all the time. Or making perfect head contact and getting paralyzed. 

Posted
10 minutes ago, LABILLBACKER said:

So true. Maybe go back and teach players the correct way to tackle. With your arms. The NFL has become pinball with players bouncing off each other all the time. Or making perfect head contact and getting paralyzed. 

 

They started the 'Head's Up' training program a number of years ago to accomplish exactly that. Unfortunately, it will take another decade or more before it filters up to the NFL.

 

Until then, it's all about getting the big hits on SportsCenter.

Posted
17 hours ago, Fadingpain said:

Couldn't disagree more.

 

The league is attempting to eliminate the classic "using the helmet as a weapon" type of hit which has become in fashion in more recent years.  It is not basic human extinct to launch your head at an opponent.  

 

Whatever happened to proper tackling form being taught as "keep your head up and see the guy you are tackling" ???

 

As long as this rule is sensibly enforced, I don't see a problem with it.

 

This.  I have been deploring the "death of tackle football" for years.  Instead of learning and executing good tackling technique, players launch themselves helmet-first.  It leads to spectacular "big hits" when successful and extra yards after contact when not (see Whitner, Donte).   Can't tell you how many times I yell at the TV "WRAP HIM UP!"

 

What I want to know is if the league will 1) actually try harder to enforce this consistently 2) quit with the lip service where they write rules like this, while simultaneously issuing money-making videos celebrating the same big hits their rules purport to deplore

30 minutes ago, LABILLBACKER said:

So true. Maybe go back and teach players the correct way to tackle. With your arms. The NFL has become pinball with players bouncing off each other all the time. Or making perfect head contact and getting paralyzed. 

 

I believe the Seahawks tried this

https://www.businessinsider.com/seahawks-tackling-style-could-change-nfl-2017-1

 

×
×
  • Create New...