Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

 

I am not necessarily a Jarvis Landry kind of guy so there is that... but if they were to sign Dez, who is going to throw the ball 40+ times a game to get them targets? 

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted

Sadly, Tyrod is not the qb to maximize the wrs talents.  And I’m so torn on Mayfield but he could be stepping into a very good situation.  I like their 2nd year TE and Duke Johnson a lot too.

Posted
12 minutes ago, Royale with Cheese said:

 

Has to be.  My first thought was something more must be up with Gordon.

There is more than meets the eye there 

 

also Ricardo Louis is out for the year with a neck injury. They don’t have much depth.

Posted
8 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said:

There is more than meets the eye there 

 

also Ricardo Louis is out for the year with a neck injury. They don’t have much depth.

 

I'm definitely pulling for Gordon after reading about how much he's struggling but I do have a feeling that he might not have failed a drug test but he recently used.....the extra counseling it to give him time to get it out of his system.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

Doesn't matter who they have at WR. They'll still finish bottom 20 in passing. Unless they bench Tyrod ...

Posted
36 minutes ago, MAJBobby said:

Good. Go make a play for Corey Coleman. 

Yup, heard they’re some possibility he is moved. I think he would be a guy you go for if available via trade. He’s shorter but has a ridiculous vertical and could stretch the field.

Posted
42 minutes ago, MAJBobby said:

Good. Go make a play for Corey Coleman. 

I wouldn’t hate the move. I think Coleman can be a pretty productive player if healthy.

Posted
4 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said:

No!! He won’t cost more than a 5th (at most). 

Not saying you’re wrong but besides being the Browns and they are stupid, why would Clevetdo that for a 1st round pick 2 years ago?  It’s kinda like us with Ragland.  Why not keep the higher round young player than just settle for a late round pick?  Coleman has more “upside” than a 5th.

Posted
4 minutes ago, C.Biscuit97 said:

Not saying you’re wrong but besides being the Browns and they are stupid, why would Clevetdo that for a 1st round pick 2 years ago?  It’s kinda like us with Ragland.  Why not keep the higher round young player than just settle for a late round pick?  Coleman has more “upside” than a 5th.

Their WR room is a lot different than it was then. They have Landry, Gordon (maybe), and are talking with Dez. Additionally, Coleman has battled injuries. It is a lot like a Ragland type of offer (with one less year of control). 

Posted
13 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said:

Their WR room is a lot different than it was then. They have Landry, Gordon (maybe), and are talking with Dez. Additionally, Coleman has battled injuries. It is a lot like a Ragland type of offer (with one less year of control). 

Ftr, I hope you’re right.  I love trading for high round pick guys who struggle with their first team. 

 

It it just blows my mind how quickly teams give up on guys.  If I was the Browns, I won’t trade him for less than a 3rd or I just keep him.  I do think an interesting trade would be a player for player, Shaq for Coleman.  Personally, I’d keep Shaq but this would be an interesting deal. 

×
×
  • Create New...