Paul Costa Posted July 24, 2018 Author Posted July 24, 2018 51 minutes ago, dneveu said: I just look at MLB as a position we literally just addressed. Doesn't seem to fit the need. I'd be more inclined to take a flier on a receiver who's fallen down a depth chart - or an offensive lineman. Agree on most of your points but Edmunds can play both inside and outside. It’s a moot point signing Robinson. I like he also can play multiple LB positions
Gigs Posted July 24, 2018 Posted July 24, 2018 On 7/22/2018 at 11:42 AM, MJS said: If he wants to play in Buffalo. You can't just force free agents to sign. Plus, if Bowman can't make a 90 man roster around the enitre league, what does that say? Could say a couple things: 1) he wants too much money, 2) he doesn't want to go through all the off-season programs, like OTA's and training camp, 3) he is viewed as not very good anymore, 4) he is waiting for a team to have a starter injured so he can come in and be a starter. I don't think the Bills will make many moves until cuts start happening around the league. Wait....so real life isn’t Madden, like half the board BILLieves?
Bleeding Bills Blue Posted July 24, 2018 Posted July 24, 2018 4 hours ago, Paul Costa said: Agree on most of your points but Edmunds can play both inside and outside. It’s a moot point signing Robinson. I like he also can play multiple LB positions I think they want him inside though. We played about 60 percent nickel last year so they'd probably prefer a thumper SAM than moving Edmunds between positions depending on formation. Humber and the other guys will compete for that spot I think
3rdand12 Posted July 25, 2018 Posted July 25, 2018 6 hours ago, Paul Costa said: Agree on most of your points but Edmunds can play both inside and outside. It’s a moot point signing Robinson. I like he also can play multiple LB positions flexibility is the mantra at McBeanes OBD. good pickup
Recommended Posts