Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Good piece  on how deep this Russian dark money situation goes:

 

Quote

 

If the N.R.A. as an organization turns out to be compromised, it would shake conservative politics to its foundation. And this is no longer a far-fetched possibility. “I serve on both the Intelligence Committee and the Finance Committee,” Senator Ron Wyden, Democrat of Oregon, told me. “So I have a chance to really look at this through the periscope of both committees. And what I have wondered about for some time is this whole issue of whether the N.R.A. is getting subverted as a Russian asset.

This is not a question that Republicans are eager to answer. Before Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee abruptly closed their investigation into Russian election interference, committee Democrats wanted to interview both Butina and Erickson. Their Republican colleagues refused. “If there were efforts towards a back channel towards the N.R.A., they didn’t want to know,” Representative Adam Schiff, a California Democrat who is the ranking member on the committee, told me. “It was too hot to handle.”

It is not surprising that Republicans would want to protect the N.R.A. According to an audit obtained by the Center for Responsive Politics, the N.R.A.’s overall spending increased by more than $100 million in 2016. “The explosion in spending came as the N.R.A. poured unprecedented amounts of money into efforts to deliver Donald Trump the White House and help Republicans hold both houses of Congress,” the center wrote.

Wyden said Republicans on the Intelligence Committee have thwarted his attempts to look deeply into the Russian money trail. “The Intelligence Committee has completely ducked for cover on follow-the-money issues,” he said. (As it happens, Richard Burr, the North Carolina Republican who heads the Senate Intelligence Committee, is one of Congress’s leading recipients of N.R.A. support.)

 

On Monday, a few hours after news broke of Butina’s arrest, the Treasury Department announced a new rule sparing some tax-exempt groups, including the N.R.A., from having to report their large donors to the I.R.S. Wyden called the move “truly grotesque,” saying it would “make it easier for Russian dark money” to flow into American politics. You might ask who benefits. The answer is: not just Trump.

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/20/opinion/republican-party-national-rifle-association-trump-russia.html?action=click&module=Opinion&pgtype=Homepage

 

Posted
25 minutes ago, westside said:

Absolutely beautiful, thinking about taking a half day.

It's going to be warm, so keep your kitty moist and cool.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
35 minutes ago, westside said:

Absolutely beautiful, thinking about taking a half day.

 

ain't nothing better in the world you know

than lying in the sun with your radio

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, row_33 said:

 

ain't nothing better in the world you know

than lying in the sun with your radio

 

 

 

 

You talked me into it.

 

?  ?

Posted

i hope this wasn't just a Canadian Content song, that you got to enjoy this in the US

 

 

 

where'd those 45 years fly by to....

 

Posted

Took the boat out today on the Vineyard Sound, down to Woods Hole and then over to Martha’s Vineyard. It was a beautiful day. 

Posted

All those candidates who received NRA money will be accused by Democrats of using Russian money. Well, because they are. 

 

Russia wants to former choas in the Democratic countries. That's why it throws hundreds of millions of dollars at NRA 

Posted
39 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

All those candidates who received NRA money will be accused by Democrats of using Russian money. Well, because they are. 

 

Russia wants to former choas in the Democratic countries. That's why it throws hundreds of millions of dollars at NRA 

You're such a choad.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

Stop trying to former his choading.

 

Tibs missed it by that much, 0 for 3,000,210

 

×
×
  • Create New...