Jump to content

Alexandria, The New Direction Of The Democrats


Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

 

You, quite specifically, don't get the opportunity to bother me much at all.  You'll note that I don't respond to you often anymore.

 

That's because I have you on ignore, along with less than a handful of other useless posters and trolls who bring down the quality of the community, like gatorman/Tiberius.

 

If we're being completely forthright, however, you used to get under my skin.

 

I take strong issue with bright people who are content to behave stupidly, and are intellectually lazy.  That's who you are here, and I have no patience or time for people who aspire to be less than the sum of their parts.

 

Do better.

 

I.e., "You're an idiot."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/2/2018 at 6:05 AM, TakeYouToTasker said:

 

To summarize:  tax cuts are bad, Marxism is good, and conservatives are all secret racists.

 

What a refreshingly novel take.

 

 

 

 

I'm pretty sure you don't understand that story.

So instead of replying to the content, we're quibbling about the TRUE story of a MYTHICAL figure? That's rich.

 

You let me know about that time in the 20th/21st century when massive tax cuts didn't precede an epic collapse, chief.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LSHMEAB said:

So instead of replying to the content, we're quibbling about the TRUE story of a MYTHICAL figure? That's rich.

 

You let me know about that time in the 20th/21st century when massive tax cuts didn't precede an epic collapse, chief.

 

I'm sorry, you seem to have me confused with someone who cares what abject morons think.

 

There are posters here who might be willing to engage with you and your myopic and infantile "analysis", but I'm not one of them.

 

Going forward, please understand that if I choose to comment on any part of anything you've said, it's only to illustrate something for the rest of the board, not a direct reply to you.

 

I don't play in the mud.

 

Take care.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

 

I'm sorry, you seem to have me confused with someone who cares what abject morons think.

 

There are posters here who might be willing to engage with you and your myopic and infantile "analysis", but I'm not one of them.

 

Going forward, please understand that if I choose to comment on any part of anything you've said, it's only to illustrate something for the rest of the board, not a direct reply to you.

 

I don't play in the mud.

 

Take care.

 

you are very insulting and obnoxious on here, even by the usual fun and potshots we take here in good nature....

 

not sure why you find this kind of reply edifying

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, row_33 said:

 

you are very insulting and obnoxious on here, even by the usual fun and potshots we take here in good nature....

 

not sure why you find this kind of reply edifying

 

 

I guess he broke up with me. I didn't even realize we were dating! 

 

The man did make a pretty strong case though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, row_33 said:

 

you are very insulting and obnoxious on here, even by the usual fun and potshots we take here in good nature....

 

not sure why you find this kind of reply edifying

 

 

 

I will take a moment to respond to you this one additional time as a courtesy.

 

Do not expect the courtesy to be repeated unless/until you can demonstrate that your posts are worth reading.

 

As I told you before, I don't have time to spare for people who strive to be less than the sum of their parts; and I have zero respect or tolerance for liars and the intellectually lazy.

 

If you want to be treated better than shabby, then be better than shabby.

 

Further, you haven't been here long enough to make any sort of critiques regarding "what we do here".

 

In fact, since you arrived the quality of "what we do here" has been diminished by your presence.

 

Do better.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/2/2018 at 5:19 PM, TakeYouToTasker said:

 

He's being sarcastic.  Par for the course for another useless poster who adds zero value.

 

My point about Robin Hood being misunderstood by leftists who look to him as a variety of folk hero, is that he wasn't robbing from the rich.  He was robbing from tax collectors and crooked government officials, and returning the money to those whom government was abusing.

I thought even the Disney cartoon made that point clear.  Back when the Robin Hood story was created there was no justifiable way to accumulate vasts amount of wealth whereas today's  marketplace allows people to become wealthy and benefit society simultaneously.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Doc Brown said:

I thought even the Disney cartoon made that point clear.  Back when the Robin Hood story was created there was no justifiable way to accumulate vasts amount of wealth whereas today's  marketplace allows people to become wealthy and benefit society simultaneously.  

 

Correct.  

 

My purpose in point that out was that it's often misrepresented.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

Ted Kennedy was such an inspiring person he even baptized Mary Jo all by himself, and didn't even try to take credit for it.

 

One of the few to be expelled for copying his exam off someone even dumber than he was.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, B-Man said:

Socialism.jpg?resize=580%2C378&ssl=1......Cortez-kennedy.jpg?resize=457,600&ssl=1

Empowered them, lifted them up indeed. With what - his rooster? 

By his own admission, Ted slept with over 1,000 women. That makes him a licentious pig of a person in my view. Stormy Daniels probably slept with fewer people. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

INSIDE EVERY LIBERAL IS A TOTALITARIAN SCREAMING TO GET OUT: No Straw Man Here: The Mask Slips in Santa Barbara.

A little noticed detail in Santa Barbara’s recent drive to criminalize plastic straws, which culminated in the Santa Barbara city council taking testimony from a nine-year-old about the planetary menace, has come to light in recent days. During that council session, councilman Jesse Dominguez said to following in response to citizens who asked “what’s next?”:

Unfortunately, common sense is just not common. We have to regulate every aspect of people’s lives.”

 

Take that one in for a moment, for it expresses the core impulse of liberalism today.

 

 

As a famous lady once said, “We’re going to take things from you on behalf of the common good.”

 

 

 

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...