Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

Latina Trotsky is going to have to know these things when she's on the Hill. 

 

She really has no grasp of what she's talking about, as if all she can do is try to repeat things she sees her friends post on Facebook.

 

 

The best way to promote her, I think, is to have everyone in the room first read 26's posts from PPP, and then bring her in, at which point she'll at least sound coherent by comparison.

 

Posted
2 minutes ago, LABillzFan said:

 

She really has no grasp of what she's talking about, as if all she can do is try to repeat things she sees her friends post on Facebook.

 

 

The best way to promote her, I think, is to have everyone in the room first read 26's posts from PPP, and then bring her in, at which point she'll at least sound coherent by comparison.

 

 

So basically, you want to read Twitter, then bring her in to misquote it?

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Kelly101 said:

joe would get crushed, way too many kiddie creep videos of ol unca joe out there 

i know dems are ok with that stuff, the rest of us not so much.

 

biden-hand-on-cops-leg.jpg

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, reddogblitz said:

 

He voted for the Iraq War so he's a total non starter for me.

Even if he ever so gently caresses your thigh?

Posted
5 hours ago, reddogblitz said:

 

Exactly. I guess all of the Move To Impeach zealots have a short memory.

 

 

I don't think it's a memory issue at all, it's just part of their emotional freakout. I know people that think that Clinton wasn't impeached because he was never thrown out of office. I also know people who are apparently unaware that criminal activity must be involved to impeach a sitting president, that it takes more than the simple belief that the president is a bad person.

 

I consider the continued digging into Trump's sexual conquests, the insistence of some kind of collusion with Russia, and everything else to be proof that Trump's detractors will not only stop at nothing to be rid of him, but that they have little desire to understand exactly what it takes to impeach a president.

Posted
14 minutes ago, Azalin said:

 

I don't think it's a memory issue at all, it's just part of their emotional freakout. I know people that think that Clinton wasn't impeached because he was never thrown out of office. I also know people who are apparently unaware that criminal activity must be involved to impeach a sitting president, that it takes more than the simple belief that the president is a bad person.

 

I consider the continued digging into Trump's sexual conquests, the insistence of some kind of collusion with Russia, and everything else to be proof that Trump's detractors will not only stop at nothing to be rid of him, but that they have little desire to understand exactly what it takes to impeach a president.

 

It's not like this is new.  Let's not forget that the Democrats filed articles of impeachment against Bush for such things as "climate change," "not armoring unarmored vehicles," "attempting to destroy Medicare," "failing to abide by the Congressional authorization to invade Iraq by invading Iraq without authorization," "falsely rescuing Jessica Lynch," "imprisoning children," "creating secret laws," "directing telecom companies to create a database of private telephone numbers," and "endangering the mental health of 9/11 first responders."  There's also a beautiful contradiction in the articles where they charge Bush with violating posse comitatus in one article, then in another charge him with causing the Katrina disaster by failing to violate posse comitatus.

 

I think "directing telecom companies to create a database of private telephone number" might be my favorite...y'know, since they hand out the phone numbers, so they already have the database.  But I have to give a shout out to "imprisoning children," because apparently the classics never die.  

Posted
3 hours ago, DC Tom said:

 

It's not like this is new.  Let's not forget that the Democrats filed articles of impeachment against Bush for such things as "climate change," "not armoring unarmored vehicles," "attempting to destroy Medicare," "failing to abide by the Congressional authorization to invade Iraq by invading Iraq without authorization," "falsely rescuing Jessica Lynch," "imprisoning children," "creating secret laws," "directing telecom companies to create a database of private telephone numbers," and "endangering the mental health of 9/11 first responders."  There's also a beautiful contradiction in the articles where they charge Bush with violating posse comitatus in one article, then in another charge him with causing the Katrina disaster by failing to violate posse comitatus.

 

I think "directing telecom companies to create a database of private telephone number" might be my favorite...y'know, since they hand out the phone numbers, so they already have the database.  But I have to give a shout out to "imprisoning children," because apparently the classics never die.  

 

:lol:

I remember most of those as issues, but I didn't realize that articles of impeachment were actually drawn up on any of them. I'm not saying that I'm surprised - the left absolutely hated GW Bush. 

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Azalin said:

 

:lol:

I remember most of those as issues, but I didn't realize that articles of impeachment were actually drawn up on any of them. I'm not saying that I'm surprised - the left absolutely hated GW Bush. 

 

Not any more! There’s nothing conservative about neoconservatives.

Edited by joesixpack
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
2 hours ago, joesixpack said:

 

Not any more! There’s nothing conservative about neoconservatives.

 

Neoconservatives for decades were defined as former Marxists who saw the light and were writing policy papers for conservative thinktanks.

 

then it was changed to anyone who supported the Papa Bush Gulf War, so it had no more meaning

 

 

 

 

Posted

These are the new faces of Neo-conservatives:

Screen-Shot-2016-10-08-at-7.27.39-PM-640150622_r26649.jpg

They must be driven out of the Dam Party. We need new flesh! [/#RESIST]

 

We want level-headed new leaders with principles like these!

maxresdefault.jpg5825fe07691e8820038b63b3-750-562.jpgwaters-ocasio-cortez457.jpg2015-09-02-gillibrandjpg-16db5c86395dd89

 

 

Posted
10 hours ago, Azalin said:

 

:lol:

I remember most of those as issues, but I didn't realize that articles of impeachment were actually drawn up on any of them. I'm not saying that I'm surprised - the left absolutely hated GW Bush. 

 

https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/110/hres1258/text

 

Yes, I exaggerated some.  But not much.  "Imprisoning Children" is the literal title of one of the articles.  As is "Creating Secret Laws."

2 hours ago, Nanker said:

 

 

 

That's much better if you stop watching at 1:40.

×
×
  • Create New...