Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Did no one want to talk about the fact that our nation's top law enforcement branch hired a guy that Fox News fired for covering up crimes?

 

So glad we support the rule of law!

Posted
1 hour ago, joesixpack said:

Sure! We can talk about how Hussein weaponized the FBI against political opponents!

Trump appointees are in charge of the DOJ and FBI. 

Posted
1 hour ago, joesixpack said:

Sure! We can talk about how Hussein weaponized the FBI against political opponents!

 

What does Obama have to do with the White House hiring a guy that was fired from Fox of all places for covering up sexual assault?

 

Can anyone actually have a conversation about a topic anymore?

 

 

18 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Trump appointees are in charge of the DOJ and FBI. 

  

Dont bite. Keep him on topic. 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted

Try not to make it an insult to Trump, Tiberius. That only stokes people’s emotions.

 

Instead, focus on why this guy is employed by the White House.

 

Are people ok with our government hiring someone who covered up abuse and assault?

 

If so, why?

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Thurmal34 said:

Try not to make it an insult to Trump, Tiberius. That only stokes people’s emotions.

 

Instead, focus on why this guy is employed by the White House.

 

Are people ok with our government hiring someone who covered up abuse and assault?

 

If so, why?

Suggestion---link to an article that is pertinent to the conversation you want to have. Don't make people Google the subject to find out about it---they won't.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
4 hours ago, 3rdnlng said:

Suggestion---link to an article that is pertinent to the conversation you want to have. Don't make people Google the subject to find out about it---they won't.

But you shouldn't have to Google the outrage du jour.  It should be common knowledge to all in the mainstream for Two Minute Hate

 

 

Posted (edited)
13 hours ago, Thurmal34 said:

Try not to make it an insult to Trump, Tiberius. That only stokes people’s emotions.

 

Instead, focus on why this guy is employed by the White House.

 

Are people ok with our government hiring someone who covered up abuse and assault?

 

If so, why?

 

Tens of millions of people were ok with voting for a Presidential candidate who spent decades covering up abuse and sexual assault by her husband and campaign officials.

 

 

 

 

Edited by KD in CA
  • Like (+1) 4
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, KD in CA said:

 

Tens of millions of people were ok with voting for a Presidential candidate who spent decades covering up abuse and sexual assault by her husband and campaign officials.

 

And then spent the following 18 months throwing a giant baby tantrum.

 

But oh, this is different, I'm sure.

Posted
14 hours ago, Thurmal34 said:

Are people ok with our government hiring someone who covered up abuse and assault?

 

If so, why?

 

"Bimbo eruptions."

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
2 hours ago, KD in CA said:

 

Tens of millions of people were ok with voting for a Presidential candidate who spent decades covering up abuse and sexual assault by her husband and campaign officials.

 

 

 

 

 

But things have changed over the last 20 years of what Bill was allowed to do to women against their will.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

"Mr. Shine was never accused of harassment himself. But his boss, Roger E. Ailes, was" - NY Times

 

So we are now holding individual employees accountable for their organization's and/or boss's activities?

 

Isn't he a victim of 'big business'?

Posted
14 hours ago, KD in CA said:

Tens of millions of people were ok with voting for a Presidential candidate who spent decades covering up abuse and sexual assault by her husband and campaign officials.

 

 

[/thread]

  • Like (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...