DC Tom Posted July 11, 2018 Posted July 11, 2018 9 minutes ago, fridge said: Having read the court document from her attorney, I think it's clear that shady is incredibly petty. A couple key points... 1. According to his ex, McCoy never broke it off, he just stopped communicating (this is provable, and seems like a weird thing to lie about... not a good look for shady) 2. According to his ex, McCoy had not asked her to move out (this... seems wrong, and what you might say if you're squatting...but that's what she's alleging) 3. According to his ex, McCoy hired movers to remove her stuff (again, bizarre that he did so without telling her to move out...allegedly) 4. According to his ex, McCoy turned off the electricity, despite her living there with her kids A few of those details, especially the bit about turning off her electricity, seem incredibly petty but not outside of the realm of an attempt to evict. The part that is most tricky to me is how it all started so suddenly and how little communication she alleges that she had with McCoy. McCoy's lack of empathy to the ex is a notable fact of the "case", and I feel like a clear motive is easily provable. I think it's entirely possible that McCoy could be responsible for sending someone to the house, but it seems unlikely he would've have left an obvious trail of communication. As of tonight there has been no evidence released that suggests McCoy is at all involved, and I think that conjecture from the original instagram post and the lack of empathy in this story overall could lead to a suspension as an investigation digs a little deeper. It does seem though, that apart from tying him to the beating/robbing, there would be any reason to assume any criminal charges will come about. I think it's clear Shady's ex's lawyer says he's incredibly petty. I also think the ex's-via-lawyer's story - "He wanted to marry me May 29th, then tried to kick me out June 1st" - is...let's say, incomplete. I'm thinking maybe the story begins sometime before the 29th.
Mr. WEO Posted July 11, 2018 Posted July 11, 2018 1 minute ago, 26CornerBlitz said: Neither can Ko Simpson. He made millions!
Augie Posted July 11, 2018 Posted July 11, 2018 Just now, 26CornerBlitz said: Neither can Ko Simpson. Hey! He’s a millionaire! Or, maybe, he was.....Has he filed bankruptcy yet? So many of his kind have....
NoSaint Posted July 11, 2018 Posted July 11, 2018 2 hours ago, MarlinTheMagician said: Some degree. But a good lawyer would tell her to keep her trap shut let the police do their work and sue him civilly if their is plausible evidence he did it. A press release is not the play. These people may lack the sophistication to know that - suggested by the misspelling of McCoy's name. On balance, I don't think he did it based on the limited facts that are out at this time. Im not sure what he did or didn’t do out of the array of accusations but the mere existence of the press release doesn’t sway me much. I think you may be over analyzing on that front
first_and_ten Posted July 11, 2018 Posted July 11, 2018 Just now, Augie said: ....one stupid piece of tape....so much trouble! Speaking of tape. Don't homes like that usually have surveillance tapes?
DC Tom Posted July 11, 2018 Posted July 11, 2018 Just now, first_and_ten said: Speaking of tape. Don't homes like that usually have surveillance tapes? Not when he - or she - rips out the cameras.
Tcali Posted July 11, 2018 Posted July 11, 2018 12 hours ago, Turbosrrgood said: I feel like this would have more credibility if it were posted on pornhub porn hub has a lot of scholarly articles 1
DC Tom Posted July 11, 2018 Posted July 11, 2018 2 hours ago, MarlinTheMagician said: Some degree. But a good lawyer would tell her to keep her trap shut let the police do their work and sue him civilly if their is plausible evidence he did it. A press release is not the play. These people may lack the sophistication to know that - suggested by the misspelling of McCoy's name. On balance, I don't think he did it based on the limited facts that are out at this time. I'm thinking maybe she doesn't have all that good a lawyer. Something about her (the lawyer) is giving me a real Saul Goodman vibe...
first_and_ten Posted July 11, 2018 Posted July 11, 2018 Just now, DC Tom said: Not when he - or she - rips out the cameras. Are you making that up ?
Lfod Posted July 11, 2018 Posted July 11, 2018 1 minute ago, first_and_ten said: Speaking of tape. Don't homes like that usually have surveillance tapes? I'm sure people with a lot of nice things should have surveillance. Add in a couple self defense things as well. At least they should.
Augie Posted July 11, 2018 Posted July 11, 2018 Just now, first_and_ten said: Speaking of tape. Don't homes like that usually have surveillance tapes? I read $800k, so no, tapes are generally unusual, but this one had a curious series of events with cameras removed and added, curious indeed. Security yes, video not so much.
DC Tom Posted July 11, 2018 Posted July 11, 2018 Just now, first_and_ten said: Are you making that up ? I've seen both reported: he removed the cameras and put up new ones, she removed the new cameras, he didn't put up new ones and she removed the old cameras, he removed the old cameras and didn't put up new ones. Who the hell knows what happened? But apparently, the cameras were removed.
Ol Dirty B Posted July 11, 2018 Posted July 11, 2018 6 minutes ago, DC Tom said: Not everyone wears all their jewelry all the time. Particularly expensive gifts. Most of these observations I make are not to say to people "You're wrong," but to point out "You're making assumptions, and in doing so discarding other plausible theories." Why would you assume she'd wear jewelry gifted to her, worth five figures, on a jaunt to London? For that matter...why the hell was she wearing it at 3:30 in the morning? Who wears expensive bracelets while they're sleeping? I agree. I lean towards he probably didn't do it. I was just saying that was the only detail that gave me any inkling that links him to it. I was taught never to travel with certain jewelry so I totally get your point. But I could see an Instagram model travelling with a bunch of jewelry she knows her ex wants back, on top of her just being an Instagram model who probably wears jewelry everywhere and takes dumb pictures. I also do work with some, rather unintelligent woman who said they wear bracelets while they sleep because of the way they fit and they don't latch. But I agree, I'd never sleep with my watch on. I was only saying it's the only detail of the story where it gives me the sense he could be involved. Like you and others have pointed out, so many different ways this could have played out.
Lfod Posted July 11, 2018 Posted July 11, 2018 After reading all this, this story has some strange depth to it.
first_and_ten Posted July 11, 2018 Posted July 11, 2018 Just now, DC Tom said: I've seen both reported: he removed the cameras and put up new ones, she removed the new cameras, he didn't put up new ones and she removed the old cameras, he removed the old cameras and didn't put up new ones. Who the hell knows what happened? But apparently, the cameras were removed. I'm sure getting to the bottom of the camera mystery might go a long way in solving this crime
Doc Posted July 11, 2018 Posted July 11, 2018 3 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said: I didn't say that. I was just indicating my surprise that it would be put out there as a plausible possibility in this case. It's a possibility, but not a plausible one. Sure it's plausible. Her cousin could have done it or she could have gotten someone else to do it. What seems implausible is that she's wearing all this jewelry in bed. 1 minute ago, first_and_ten said: Are you making that up ? Shady apparently had the security system changed on June 1st and she had the cameras removed.
Reed83HOF Posted July 11, 2018 Posted July 11, 2018 39 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said: I see nothing about jewelry being returned. Mistaken Identity. This is for LeShawn McCoy, not LeSean McCoy 2
xxxxxxxx Posted July 11, 2018 Posted July 11, 2018 (edited) 47 minutes ago, The Red King said: ...you're the only one jumping to conclusions, without evidence even. Many of us aren't ready to pass judgement either way without hard evidence, as it is just as possible he is being framed as he is guilty. You've certainly jugged the potential victim quite harshly. And no all of the situations that you are mentioning are not equally possible given precidents. You watch too many movies dude. People are rarely framed for crimes. People commonly beat the crap out if their exes though or do something ****ty to an exe that !@#$s them up to get back at them. Ask any one in law enforcement to offer an opinon on that one. Edited July 11, 2018 by MURPHD6
Misterbluesky Posted July 11, 2018 Posted July 11, 2018 2 minutes ago, DC Tom said: I've seen both reported: he removed the cameras and put up new ones, she removed the new cameras, he didn't put up new ones and she removed the old cameras, he removed the old cameras and didn't put up new ones. Who the hell knows what happened? But apparently, the cameras were removed. Who was holding the ladder...
Recommended Posts