Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, whatdrought said:

 

He’d Have To be the biggest idiot ever to set that up. 

Does he impress you as being intelligent?

 

 

Posted
16 minutes ago, Boatdrinks said:

Do we even know that they were taken or just demanded ? Could be circumstantial. This woman isn’t a hermit and there are probably many acquaintances who know the origin of this loot. Many possibilities.

Exactly!  Could be quite circumstantial.

Posted
Just now, Boatdrinks said:

 Yep. Don’t underestimate these professional “ side chick” types. One thing she doesn’t appear interested in doing is working. A few minutes of being roughed up might seem better than getting a job.

 

I don't understand how you can put all that together from a couple instagram photos.

Posted
Just now, Mr. WEO said:

 

I've been a critic of McCoy's off filed stuff---but this level of apologist vigor, I haven't yet seen.  4D stuff..

 

Dude- seriously...? How is anything he or i said apologist? 

 

Have you you ever seen To Kill a Mockingbird? 

 

If mccoy did this, let him rot. If he didn’t, don’t ruin his life because someone got on social media and made false accusations. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Binghamton Beast said:

 

It happened to Dirty Harry.

 

 

That was a killer though.  Not someone who had McCoys "jewelry"

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
8 hours ago, BringBackOrton said:

You're wrong.  Read the actual statues.

 

They have domestic violence exceptions in those 3 states because they have mandatory reporting.  

 

It's really poorly written there.

 

I'm not wrong.  Depending on the state criminal activity must be reported.   Depends on the weapon in some states, in others it doesn't.  

 

Either way, how did this become part of this thread! 

Posted
1 minute ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

Both were directly involved in some capacity.  This is different with McCoy not being on the scene.  Apples to oranges. 

 

I guess by your definition Rae Carruth wasn't "directly involved" in the murder of his pregnant ex-girlfriend? He wasn't directly on the scene after all 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Fadingpain said:

Does he impress you as being intelligent?

 

 

 

I haven’t met him. No clue. I would believe that he did that, but man, that’s dumb.

Posted
Just now, whatdrought said:

 

Dude- seriously...? How is anything he or i said apologist? 

 

Have you you ever seen To Kill a Mockingbird? 

 

If mccoy did this, let him rot. If he didn’t, don’t ruin his life because someone got on social media and made false accusations. 

 

 

You've concluded that it is as likely that she intentionally had someone do that damage to her---or she did it herself!, in order to win a future lawsuit--than it is that it happened as she claims

Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, whatdrought said:

 

If mccoy did this, let him rot. If he didn’t, don’t ruin his life because someone got on social media and made false accusations. 

 

Agreed.

 

Totally OT, but a cautionary tale that is timely in this case:   https://buffalonews.com/2018/07/10/charges-dropped-in-wheatfield-child-snatching-because-of-mistaken-identity/

 

"There's always going to be people who say, 'You were charged,' and aren't going to read how the case got dismissed or thrown out. They'll think he got out on some technicality. I think you can't unring the bell. Once you've been charged and arrested, there's some stigma there," Viola said.

 

 

 

Edited by Lurker
Posted
3 minutes ago, fridge said:

 

I don't understand how you can put all that together from a couple instagram photos.

He hates women.  That's how he does it.

 

Probably divorced as well.

 

 

Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, DabillsDaBillsDaBills said:

 

I guess by your definition Rae Carruth wasn't "directly involved" in the murder of his pregnant ex-girlfriend? He wasn't directly on the scene after all 

 

Again. That was proven in a court of law.   As I 1st posted in response to you, it would have to be proven that McCoy orchestrated the attack on her. Absent that, there is nothing to suspend him for.  What are you missing? 

Edited by 26CornerBlitz
Posted
Just now, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

Again. That was proven in a court of law.   As I 1st posted in response to you, it would have to be proven that McCoy orchestrated the attack on her. Absent that, there is nothing to suspend him for.  What are you missing? 

 

How many suspensions are preceded by criminal convictions in  the NFL?

 

 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said:

 

 

You've concluded that it is as likely that she intentionally had someone do that damage to her---or she did it herself!, in order to win a future lawsuit--than it is that it happened as she claims

 

Thats actually exactly how that works.

 

We we have enough knowledge to know that we don’t have enough knowledge to know. 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

Again. That was proven in a court of law.   As I 1st posted in response to you, it would have to be proven that McCoy orchestrated the attack on her. Absent that, there is nothing to suspend him for.  What are you missing? 

 

I think you're missing the fact that Ezekiell Elliott was suspended for 6 games even though he never even faced criminal charges, let alone a conviction. 

 

If this story drags out and causes a black eye for the NFL then Shady will 100% be suspended. Regardless if he faces criminal charges or not. 

Posted
7 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said:

I've been a critic of McCoy's off filed stuff---but this level of apologist vigor, I haven't yet seen.  4D stuff..

 

Gee, ya think?  Seems like you would have learned your lesson after the nightclub incident.

Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said:

How many suspensions are preceded by criminal convictions in  the NFL?

 

Carrying over from the Philly cop thing huh?  You were worth the price of admission in that case. :lol:

Edited by 26CornerBlitz
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...