LeSean McCoy allegations

[x-BillzeBubba]

13 minutes ago, SouthNYfan said:

 

Exactly bubba.

He has the $$ why wouldn't he get the lawyer?

Maybe the real question should be why has SHE retained a lawyer to speak for her in this matter...is she not the innocent victim of this?

Also, if reports true about the jewellery loan, that the jewellery is not his to give her,  yet this lawyer made a written and potentially false statement that it is, so she needs to explain why she is lying on her clients' behalf, whether it was a lie by her client to her or otherwise

[eball]

6 minutes ago, LikeIGiveADarn said:

 

There is no reason to think that hiring an attorney in this situation is a bad idea. Shady is a public figure being accused of nasty stuff. It's smart to get an attorney and grt ahead of it regardless of whether he actually did anything or not.

 

Bingo.  There's a common misconception out there that hiring a lawyer means you did something wrong.  It's a preemptive move to protect himself.  Now, perhaps he did do something wrong but the act of obtaining representation should not by itself be considered evidence of that.

[dollars 2 donuts]

10 minutes ago, eball said:

 

Narcissism, entitlement, delusion -- take your pick.  She was living a lifestyle -- thanks to Shady -- she likely couldn't come close to living on her own.

 

 

...and if we are to believe Ripoffreport, and I am not saying we do, she has led this sort of nomadic life of living off pro athletes and leaving a trail of unpaid bills for at least the last 10 years.

 

That is not a good look for any woman, or any human.  Throw in the fact she is north of 30, has kids, and her only means of income maybe living off others and getting hits on instagram all starts to paint of picture of her life at this stage as being...desperate. 

 

The "good look" gravy train may be over, my residence is 1 or 2 court hearings away from being my car, and I am not sure I am going to be able to pull off becoming Vice President of Canadian GM...so what's my possible end game?

Edited July 13, 2018 by dollars 2 donuts

[CommonCents]

Just now, dollars 2 donuts said:

 

 

...and if we are to believe Ripoffreport, and I am not saying we do, she has led this sort of nomadic life of living off pro athletes and leaving a trail of unpaid bills for at least the last 10 years.

 

That is not a good look for any woman, or any human.  Throw in the fact she is north of 30, has kids, and only means of income maybe living off others and getting hits on instagram starts to paint of picture of her life at this stage as...desperate. 

 

The "good look" gravy train may be over, my residence is 1 or 2 court hearings away from being my car, and I am not sure I am going to be able to pull off becoming Vice President of Canadian GM...so what's my possible end game?

The answer shouldn’t be so hard. Give it a shot.

[x-BillzeBubba]

Just now, eball said:

 

Bingo.  There's a common misconception out there that hiring a lawyer means you did something wrong.  It's a preemptive move to protect himself.  Now, perhaps he did do something wrong but the act of obtaining representation should not by itself be considered evidence of that.

Hiring a good lawyer is a clear warning shot to the ex and/or authorities that they need to step carefully in their actions and statements

[dollars 2 donuts]

1 minute ago, Commonsense said:

The answer shouldn’t be so hard. Give it a shot.

 

 

I believe I know how you came up with your name.

[eball]

1 minute ago, x-BillzeBubba said:

Hiring a good lawyer is a clear warning shot to the ex and/or authorities that they need to step carefully in their actions and statements

 

Notice how after Shady hired his lawyer the victim/her lawyer immediately came forward with "I've never accused Shady of violence and I don't know what that IG post was about?"

[dollars 2 donuts]

1 minute ago, eball said:

 

Notice how after Shady hired his lawyer the victim/her lawyer immediately came forward with "I've never accused Shady of violence and I don't know what that IG post was about?"

 

 

ya know, eball, and no disrespect to anyone on this board/thread whose stated as much, but I can't believe anyone here, if they were hypothetically innocent in these same circumstances could say with a straight face:

 

"pfft...I'm not hiring a lawyer.  Why would I?  I'm innocent.  It's just going to make me look guilty."

 

 

[sodbuster]

1 hour ago, x-BillzeBubba said:

Just an interesting side-note, per Rodak, McCoy's real given name is LeShawn, he just prefers LeSean for some reason

Changing his name? Sounds like something a guilty man would do...

Edited July 13, 2018 by sodbuster

[DCOrange]

8 hours ago, transplantbillsfan said:

Hey... so the OP still isn't being updated, so I don't know if this has been posted, but can someone with a subscription to The Athletic tell us what the hell this says????

 

 

Cliff notes:

 

• Summary of the instagram/facebook posts that we all know about already
• Statement from Cordon's lawyer where he says the attacker demanded specific items that McCoy had also been requesting/hinting could be stolen
• Police statement that the attack was not random, but a specifically targeted attack
• McCoy had filed eviction papers roughly a year ago, but eventually he had the order dismissed as he and Cordon patched things up
• McCoy then had eviction papers filed again roughly one month ago; Cordon's lawyer says that this was illegally done because the papers were signed by McCoy's friend (who is not allowed to practice law) and the papers were served to a minor: Cordon's son.
• McCoy was in Miami at the time of the attack, so he could not have personally carried it out (though Cordon has not accused him of this anyways)
• Cordon claims that McCoy had their security cameras removed and replaced by a new system that only he had access to. McCoy claims that Cordon had the security cameras removed (not sure if this is referring to the new system McCoy had installed or the original system)
• In the aftermath of the attack, Cordon's son was missing. The window in his bedroom was open with a bedsheet tied and draped down the side of the house. The attacker walked out the front door, so either this window part is completely unrelated (maybe her son snuck out his room the night of the attack and it had nothing to do with anything at all) or this could have potentially been how the intruder got in. I'm guessing it's the former.
• Cordon says the neighbors have cameras, so they might have a view of the attacker, though she also says he was wearing all black and a mask. Seems to me that the only way they'll be able to identify the attacker is if they have a view of his license plates or if there's some physical evidence at the scene.
• Police released reports regarding all the other times they were called to the house. In July of 2017, they came to the house to find piles of clothing and stuff on the ground; Cordon had apparently followed McCoy to Vegas and caught him cheating and they were breaking up. At this time, McCoy mentioned that jewelers often loaned them high-value jewelry to wear at events and that Cordon hadn't returned some of the items. He also told Police that he was nervous about being around Cordon because of the climate of domestic abuse in the NFL. At this time, Police informed McCoy of the eviction process that they would have to go through.
• In April, Police arrived once again after hearing a heated argument over the phone, during which McCoy was trying to remove Cordon's belongings. By the time Police arrived, things had calmed down and they had worked things out between themselves.
• In June, Police arrived once again after Cordon called to inform them that McCoy was having her possessions removed again. When Police arrived, it turned out that it was McCoy's mom who had shown up to pick some things up for McCoy. The disagreement was regarding some furniture which both McCoy and Cordon viewed as their own personal property. The furniture was left at the house.
• They were supposed to show up in court on July 10th, but it was delayed to August 14th due to a medical emergency in Cordon's family (I think initial reports said it was her lawyer's family though; not sure which is true)

[JohnC]

3 minutes ago, eball said:

 

Bingo.  There's a common misconception out there that hiring a lawyer means you did something wrong.  It's a preemptive move to protect himself.  Now, perhaps he did do something wrong but the act of obtaining representation should not by itself be considered evidence of that.

As you noted hiring an attorney in a legal matter whether you are innocent or guilty of anything is the smart thing to do. People are naive if they believe that the police or criminal justice authorities deal with people the same when they are represented or not by counsel. That is not the case. 

 

Sometimes people believe that they don't need an attorney and act on their own behalf. Then they realize that they have unwittingly placed themselves in jeopardy. They then belatedly get an attorney. When you act belatedly you may have placed yourself in jeopardy and made your situation more complicated. 

 

 

[CodeMonkey]

1 hour ago, jaybee said:

Theory #1   Shady put someone up to the robbery.  (a popular theory)

 

Theory #2  The girl staged the whole thing and beat herself up, or had someone beat her up in a quest dor Shady dollars

 

Theory #3  Loose lips sink ships.  Shady was yakkin about the jewelry amongst friend / acquaintances and one of them decided he'd go after the jewelry.  

 

The more I think about it the more #3 seems most plausible but we are talking Shady here so anything goes.  The hiring of the prominent defense lawyer is very troubling to me if he indeed is innocent.

 

This sucks.

To me #3 seems the least likely. If someone was there for the jewelry they would have taken the jewelry.  There would be no need to beat the F out of her.

Lets face it, there are no rocket scientists involved here. #2 would require some intelligence on the part of the woman. So by default, that leaves #1.  

Occam's razor would also favor #1

 

One thing is certain.  Only a few people know for sure what happened, and none of them are on this board posting in this thread.

[x-BillzeBubba]

The gal says the intruder demanded the contested jewellery...but she has been lying about that jewellery thru her lawyer about who it belongs to, so who knows what the real story is.  The dude actually demanded her cash also

[YoloinOhio]

1 hour ago, SoCal Deek said:

Now THAT is one of the more interesting things that I’ve read about this whole caper. Could he not spell LeShawn as a young kid or something?

He knew he would one day live in Buffalo and wanted to make sure it was the authentic Irish spelling 

[Doc]

 

48 minutes ago, dollars 2 donuts said:

...and if we are to believe Ripoffreport, and I am not saying we do, she has led this sort of nomadic life of living off pro athletes and leaving a trail of unpaid bills for at least the last 10 years.

 

That is not a good look for any woman, or any human.  Throw in the fact she is north of 30, has kids, and her only means of income maybe living off others and getting hits on instagram all starts to paint of picture of her life at this stage as being...desperate. 

 

The "good look" gravy train may be over, my residence is 1 or 2 court hearings away from being my car, and I am not sure I am going to be able to pull off becoming Vice President of Canadian GM...so what's my possible end game?

 

She and Shady broke up a year ago and she still hasn't found another sugar daddy.  Some people will resort to desperate measures to keep living the lifestyle to which they've become accustomed/think they deserve. 

 

And had she not been flaunting the jewelry on social media, I'd be more inclined to believe it was set-up by Shady.  But it's there for all to see.

[eball]

I may have missed whether this was reported or not, but was the door unlocked or did the assailant have a key?  Or is that not known?

 

If the house has an automated door lock there should be a record of that.

[26CornerBlitz]

Just now, eball said:

I may have missed whether this was reported or not, but was the door unlocked or did the assailant have a key?  Or is that not known?

 

If the house has an automated door lock there should be a record of that.

 

Neither the POE nor the means have been publicly disclosed AFAIK. 

[DieHardBillsFan]

This could truly be bad luck and timing.

 

There was clearly a moving truck at the property. Many thieves steel closely to the time of a moving trucks arrival. It may have appeared to them that it was an easy hit and then she had that bracelet on and asked for the rest of the jewelry.

 

I know 3 people off the top of my head that this kind of thing has happened to after there was a moving truck. Luckily they were all away from home.

[Buffalo_Stampede]

1 minute ago, eball said:

I may have missed whether this was reported or not, but was the door unlocked or did the assailant have a key?  Or is that not known?

 

If the house has an automated door lock there should be a record of that.

I think read somewhere there was no forced entry. Not sure what if that answers the question or not. 

[Guffalo]

1 minute ago, eball said:

I may have missed whether this was reported or not, but was the door unlocked or did the assailant have a key?  Or is that not known?

 

If the house has an automated door lock there should be a record of that.

Well, if her kid had taken off using the bedsheet out the window, it would probably be smart to have the door unlocked so he could get back in. (just a thought)