Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Quote

 

People who make up stories don’t ask the FBI to investigate those stories.

 

 

 

 

Quote

 

Have you found Joy Reid's hackers yet?

 

 

 

 

.

Let's pretend that the FBI is going to investigate..................... Tell me one verifiable detail the FBI could start an investigation with.................... ONE.

.

 

 

 

 

It’s never “believe the women” where a prominent Dem is concerned. It’s “drag a hundred dollar bill through a trailer park, you never know what you’ll find.” 

 

Or, as with this story, they just pretend it never happened and move on.

 

 

  

KEITH ELLISON’S ACCUSER, KAREN MONAHAN: Dems “smeared, threatened, isolated” me.

 

 

.

 
Posted
2 minutes ago, donbb said:

 

Not only shouldn't the alleged victim be heard, BeginnersMind should never be heard either!

 

TAKE YOU TO TASKER HAS DROPPED THE HAMMER... (from his basement wi-fi while wiping Cheeto dust on his pajama pants)

 

Gary with more lies.

 

The accuser should absolutely be heard, under oath; in order that the accused can meet his accuser, per the hallmarks of liberal jurisprudence.

 

Also, BeginnersMind should feel free to voice his/her thoughts; but should do so with no expectation that he/she is insulated from his/her own actions and choices when it comes to tone and civility.  IE.  When you act like a !@#$, expect to be treated like a !@#$.

Posted
1 hour ago, DC Tom said:

 

As I am aware.  And as the legal guardian of a mentally disabled adult...he's not retarded, he's mentally disabled.

 

Baskin, however....he's retarded.

You adopted Ryan L Bills?

Posted
6 minutes ago, Boyst62 said:

Got banned for !@#$ing with mods too much. 

Isn't he back under a different name? I could swear he pops in here occasionally.

Posted
Just now, LBSeeBallLBGetBall said:

Isn't he back under a different name? I could swear he pops in here occasionally.

What name??  Pm me if you want.  I hope he is. He was a favorite.  For a homo.

Posted
1 hour ago, LABillzFan said:

 

They picked a day, time and place for her to testify. If she somehow is unable to be there short of being in the hospital in traction, then it's time to vote. Period. 

 

Lets not give #theresistance any ideas, please.

Posted
2 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Oh, I'm certain her lawyer grilled her pretty severely.

Question 1. "What is your favorite color?"

Question 2. "What day of the week is it?"

Question 3. "What is your full name?"

Question 4. "Have you ever eaten chocolate cake?"

 

RESULTS: She passed with flying colors. 

 

 

1 hour ago, baskin said:

You make a lot of assumptions about me....kind of like completely subverting a process....in a way....without evidence.... 

 

Listen....I am as sure he is guilty as you are sure that the accuser is a democrat liar who is doing it to scuttle his nomination....

 

I say the odds of someone from K's past somehow leveraging that to produce a concocted story 35 years in the past and laying the groundwork with her husband and therapist to go before congress and testify to such  are long...whereas a self confessed drunk at prep school clumsily trying to make it with a chick....that is something I believe....

 

of course he did it.....

 

carry on with your circle jerk....

 

I am WAY over my 2 post a month limit

 

 

:lol:

Her father is a CIA Assassin Paymaster.

She's a Bernie supporter

She oversees THIS - CIA Undergraduate Internship Program

From her WaPo Article 

"Ford said she does not remember how the gathering came together the night of the incident. She said she often spent time in the summer at the Columbia Country Club pool in Chevy Chase, where in those pre-cellphone days, teenagers learned about gatherings via word of mouth. She also doesn’t recall who owned the house or how she got there."

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

 

 This is exactly why I called you a liar, and mother!@#$ed you.

 

The post you made, which I responded to, contained absolutely no civility, and was steeped in passive aggressive horseshit, and dismissive and intentionally prejudicial language;  after which you had the unmitigated gall to a use me of not being willing to engage.

 

Again, you reap what you sow; and you sowed mistreatment, then stooped to blaming others for for treating you in the same manner you behave.

 

Your act is tired.

 

Best of luck to you brother. I don't feel that I sowed mistreatment of others, and apologized for comparing anyone here to LaDexter. I don't believe anyone here is anti-Semitic--except him, of course. 

 

Posted
Just now, 3rdnlng said:

You have favorite homos?

 

Don't we all?  Mine is Elton John, but Collin Martin is a close second.

Posted

Grassley's last line in that letter are kind of funny.

 

Oh, and by the way, if she's going to testify on Monday, we need her bio and testimony on Friday.

 

Should be an interesting Friday.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, LeviF91 said:

 

Don't we all?  Mine is Elton John, but Collin Martin is a close second.

You must enjoy Sir Elton John's music on your 8 tracks up there in Wasilla.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, LABillzFan said:

Grassley's last line in that letter are kind of funny.

 

Oh, and by the way, if she's going to testify on Monday, we need her bio and testimony on Friday.

 

Should be an interesting Friday.

 

Don't believe they will provide it. If I'm the Ds and she will testify, I'd keep the Rs guessing. Not that they won't be ready, but at least keep the unpredictability factor higher. 

 

 

Posted
11 minutes ago, BeginnersMind said:

 

Don't believe they will provide it. If I'm the Ds and she will testify, I'd keep the Rs guessing. Not that they won't be ready, but at least keep the unpredictability factor higher. 

 

 

 

Plus...they don't provide it, committee only reinterviews Kavanaugh (or Republicans cancel Monday's hearing completely), Democrats scream how unfairly the accuser is being treated - and Democratic base is too damned stupid to know that the committee is only acting according to Senate rules - and Democrats get yet another "win" going in to the mid-terms.

 

Probably with the complaints of "Why is this being rushed?" and "Friday isn't enough time!"  And asking the hearing be delayed for another week or two - more likely two - so they can prepare properly.  (That Feinstein sat on this for two months is completely irrelevant - no longer part of the story.)  Which the Republicans won't do, which will be portrayed as completely unfair and "War on Women" of them...and again, a "win" going in to mid-terms.

 

She's not testifying.  It's actually better for Democrats if she doesn't.  

×
×
  • Create New...