4merper4mer Posted September 18, 2018 Posted September 18, 2018 13 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Republicans fear allegation against Kavanaugh could shift dynamics of midterms The GOP had hoped that the appointment of Brett M. Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court could encourage turnout by the party's voters. Now some worry the sexual assault accusation could refocus attention on an issue that could drive up the Democratic vote in November. By Michael Scherer It's all most as if neither the Republican nor the Democrats care about the Supreme Court nominee from any perspective except how it impacts them personally. 2
Tiberius Posted September 18, 2018 Posted September 18, 2018 4 minutes ago, DC Tom said: Which is the entire purpose of the accusation. Hopefully, but you have no proof they are pulling an awesome trick like that. 5 minutes ago, 4merper4mer said: It's all most as if neither the Republican nor the Democrats care about the Supreme Court nominee from any perspective except how it impacts them personally. Sure. Same as it ever was, same as it ever was
BeginnersMind Posted September 18, 2018 Posted September 18, 2018 53 minutes ago, B-Man said: MICHAEL WALSH: With Kavanaugh Smear, Democrats Use Americans’ Innate Good Will Against Them. . Do you find talking in memes is conducive to dialog, or emotional reaction?
Deranged Rhino Posted September 18, 2018 Posted September 18, 2018 https://mobile.twitter.com/WiredSources/status/1042068438838116352 What are the odds she doesn't even show Monday? 2:1? 1
4merper4mer Posted September 18, 2018 Posted September 18, 2018 2 minutes ago, BeginnersMind said: Do you find Calling people nazis is conducive to dialog, or emotional reaction? I changed it a bit and now it's a question for you.
BeginnersMind Posted September 18, 2018 Posted September 18, 2018 (edited) 44 minutes ago, 4merper4mer said: I thought you wanted all of us to be polite. And then you start calling people Nazis. It's almost as if you're a phony. I called someone here a Nazi? Please tell me where I did that. To the extent that I insulted some of the white guys here who feel oppressed by mentioning Charlottesville, I definitely do NOT think you're Nazis,* and apologize for same. Truly. I was merely trying to say that the complaints of white male oppression strike me as absurd. The "Unite the Right" rally in Charlottesville was all about white male oppression. That's not some wild-eyed assertion. It's a fact. *I reserve the right to call LaDexter a Nazi, not as an insult, but an identifier. Edited September 18, 2018 by BeginnersMind
4merper4mer Posted September 18, 2018 Posted September 18, 2018 3 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: https://mobile.twitter.com/WiredSources/status/1042068438838116352 What are the odds she doesn't even show Monday? 2:1? That's the delay tactic. She has a busy life and should be able to testify based on her very hectic schedule. She frees up in mid-November. 1
Deranged Rhino Posted September 18, 2018 Posted September 18, 2018 5 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: https://mobile.twitter.com/WiredSources/status/1042068438838116352 What are the odds she doesn't even show Monday? 2:1? https://mobile.twitter.com/SaraCarterDC/status/1042070177750413313 2
4merper4mer Posted September 18, 2018 Posted September 18, 2018 1 minute ago, BeginnersMind said: I called someone here a Nazi? Please tell me where I did that. The "Unite the Right" rally in Charlottesville was all about white male oppression. That's not some wild-eyed assertion. It's a fact. You're a commie.
TakeYouToTasker Posted September 18, 2018 Posted September 18, 2018 2 minutes ago, BeginnersMind said: I called someone here a Nazi? Please tell me where I did that. The "Unite the Right" rally in Charlottesville was all about white male oppression. That's not some wild-eyed assertion. It's a fact. You're a hack and a liar, and you personally represent approximately zero of the characteristics you claim to champion.
donbb Posted September 18, 2018 Posted September 18, 2018 @BeginnersMind good luck having a rational conversation with any of these idiots
KRC Posted September 18, 2018 Posted September 18, 2018 8 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: https://mobile.twitter.com/WiredSources/status/1042068438838116352 What are the odds she doesn't even show Monday? 2:1? I expect that there will be a call to delay the Monday hearing so that she can "properly prepare" for it. Sometime close to/after the midterms. You know, because this is too important to rush. Forget that WaPo and DiFi had this information for months. 1
BeginnersMind Posted September 18, 2018 Posted September 18, 2018 2 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said: You're a hack and a liar, and you personally represent approximately zero of the characteristics you claim to champion. Lying about...? Are you all still on the theory about my Deep State paycheck and how I followed DR from other places?
TakeYouToTasker Posted September 18, 2018 Posted September 18, 2018 Just now, BeginnersMind said: Lying about...? Are you all still on the theory about my Deep State paycheck and how I followed DR from other places? I'm saying that in this very thread you have demonstrated that you are a hack and a liar, and have represented approximately zero of the characteristics you claim to champion. Did I stutter, mother!@#$er? 1
BeginnersMind Posted September 18, 2018 Posted September 18, 2018 Just now, KRC said: I expect that there will be a call to delay the Monday hearing so that she can "properly prepare" for it. Sometime close to/after the midterms. You know, because this is too important to rush. Forget that WaPo and DiFi had this information for months. That's what Feinstein hoped for, but the Rs called the hearing quickly. They will certainly push for a delay. WaPo probably didn't run with it because there was nothing verifiable. I swim upstream of the Niagara River here and believe that most journalists TRY to get stories right, and properly discarded this one. WaPo would have loved to run this if there was some "there" there.
Buffalo_Gal Posted September 18, 2018 Posted September 18, 2018 13 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: https://mobile.twitter.com/WiredSources/status/1042068438838116352 What are the odds she doesn't even show Monday? 2:1? Yeah, the surprise will be if she shows up. A "vague memory" and testimony under oath do not mix. 1
BeginnersMind Posted September 18, 2018 Posted September 18, 2018 1 minute ago, TakeYouToTasker said: I'm saying that in this very thread you have demonstrated that you are a hack and a liar, and have represented approximately zero of the characteristics you claim to champion. Did I stutter, mother!@#$er? I see you continue to be unwilling to have a dialog.
DC Tom Posted September 18, 2018 Posted September 18, 2018 Just now, BeginnersMind said: That's what Feinstein hoped for, but the Rs called the hearing quickly. They will certainly push for a delay. WaPo probably didn't run with it because there was nothing verifiable. I swim upstream of the Niagara River here and believe that most journalists TRY to get stories right, and properly discarded this one. WaPo would have loved to run this if there was some "there" there. I used to believe that. Until it became pretty clear a few years ago that they'd completely lost interest in doing so. 1
boyst Posted September 18, 2018 Posted September 18, 2018 Just now, BeginnersMind said: I see you continue to be unwilling to have a dialog. You're not doing yourself any favors and do come off like an !@#$. Him getting frustrated is questionable, thiugh
DC Tom Posted September 18, 2018 Posted September 18, 2018 1 minute ago, Buffalo_Gal said: Yeah, the surprise will be if she shows up. A "vague memory" and testimony under oath do not mix. They do when you're trying to entrap Kavanaugh. I mean...Democrats are accusing Kavanaugh of lying about not attending the party, when the accuser doesn't even remember which year the party took place. It's pretty easy to frame questions to Kavanaugh in such a way that he's lying about attending/not attending the indeterminate party under question.
Recommended Posts