Nanker Posted September 17, 2018 Author Posted September 17, 2018 14 hours ago, Buffalo_Gal said: Oh she seems tots legit: and one more, because why not? Her therapist notes DO NOT mention Kavanaugh So she had visits with Psycho The Rapist. That explains a lot.
Tiberius Posted September 17, 2018 Posted September 17, 2018 18 minutes ago, DC Tom said: That you equate "all consideration required" to "just desserts" is the perfect description off your assmudgeonry. Alls fair in love, war and politics
3rdnlng Posted September 17, 2018 Posted September 17, 2018 58 minutes ago, Tiberius said: And Kavenaugh is getting his just deserts as well I guess they're turning up the heat on him, eh?
Buffalo_Gal Posted September 17, 2018 Posted September 17, 2018 13 minutes ago, Nanker said: So she had visits with Psycho The Rapist. That explains a lot. Oh, it gets "better". Psycho chick now as a "motive":LinkMartha G. Kavanaugh, the mother of Brett Kavanaugh was a Maryland district judge in 1996. In an amazing coincidence, Martha Kavanaugh was the judge in a foreclosure case in which Christine Blasey-Ford’s parents were the defendants. /snip During a 1996 foreclosure case, Martha Kavanaugh ruled against the parents of Christine Blasey-Ford in a foreclosure case. 2
Nanker Posted September 17, 2018 Author Posted September 17, 2018 They don’t care that this would come out. They just don’t care. Resist by any and every means necessary.
Tiberius Posted September 17, 2018 Posted September 17, 2018 Kellyanne Conway declared: “This woman should not be insulted and should not be ignored. … She should be heard.” 1 minute ago, Nanker said: They don’t care that this would come out. They just don’t care. Resist by any and every means necessary. Yes! F you!!!
Buffalo_Gal Posted September 17, 2018 Posted September 17, 2018 12 minutes ago, Nanker said: They don’t care that this would come out. They just don’t care. Resist by any and every means necessary. Wellllll there seems to be a certain faction of the "new feminists" who are willing to do or say anything for "the cause". She may not care that her life is about to be a punchline and every crazy thing she has said and done is now going to become public knowledge. She willing to "take a stand" to fight for "what is right!" (Normal people do not make pink kitty hats, or dress up as walking vulva, or condoms and go out in public to promote "their cause" this way.) For as disinterested as the MSM and "the left" are in who she is and why she decided 40 years later to tell her story (and I am talking story in the fabled sense), there are plenty on "the right" who will not take her claims at face value, and will use public archives, research, etc to find out the truth, and spread the work via social media, phone trees, and rallies (no matter how disinterested the GOPe, left, and MSM may be).
boyst Posted September 17, 2018 Posted September 17, 2018 @Kemp anyone ask his take yet on this womans bimbo eruptions???
Koko78 Posted September 17, 2018 Posted September 17, 2018 48 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: I guess they're turning up the heat on him, eh? Meh, that was a little dry.
BeginnersMind Posted September 17, 2018 Posted September 17, 2018 Feinstein timed this to perfection. She had the entire process to ask about this, but chose to do it after, in the hopes to delay the vote until after the mid-term. Ford contacted the Washington Post back when he was nominated, and they chose to do nothing on the story. They have not said why, but probably because there was no corroborating evidence (the shrink's notes from 2012 are OK but of course the shrink didn't name names--which is smart). The real trick will be if the release will sway and of the fence-sitting Rs to move to delay.
Koko78 Posted September 17, 2018 Posted September 17, 2018 (edited) 9 minutes ago, BeginnersMind said: Feinstein timed this to perfection. She had the entire process to ask about this, but chose to do it after, in the hopes to delay the vote until after the mid-term. Of course it was calculated for maximum impact and disruption. This Ford lady isn't a 'victim' to the Democrats - she's a prop. Nothing more, nothing less. Yet the swamp cannot figure out why people are disgusted with them. Edited September 17, 2018 by Koko78 3
BeginnersMind Posted September 17, 2018 Posted September 17, 2018 Just now, Koko78 said: Of course it was calculated for maximum impact and disruption. This Ford lady isn't a 'victim' to the Democrats - she's a prop. Nothing more, nothing less. Yet the swamp cannot figure out why people are disgusted with them. Shrewd people use circumstances to their advantage. Trump, who is not part of the swamp in his supporter's POV, uses people as props all the time. She's the passed pawn and their only shot at derailing Kavanaugh, who would otherwise fly through.
Nanker Posted September 17, 2018 Author Posted September 17, 2018 Desperation time for the Libs. They're certifiable.
donbb Posted September 17, 2018 Posted September 17, 2018 17 hours ago, Buffalo_Gal said: Fake as Fake Lake That is Christine A. Ford, MSW, not Christine B. Ford, PhD, the accuser.
4merper4mer Posted September 17, 2018 Posted September 17, 2018 There are lots of issues here. People on both sides of any argument sometimes lie. When a lot of time has passed, it is hard to tell what is the truth. Sometimes people's memories lie to them. They think they are remembering the truth, but they are off. This presents problems when people are nominated to highly important positions. I think we'd all agree that the best solution is an objective one. We need a way for the government to record every moment of everyone's life and store it in case that person is nominated for something. A position like Supreme Court judge is just too important to leave if to memory, whether it is the memory of an accuser, or the nominee. I say record everyone's life now. 2
B-Man Posted September 17, 2018 Posted September 17, 2018 Several of you on here seem to be having a problem with comprehending the written word, I will stick with colorful cartoons for you, since common sense doesn't seem to be your strength.
B-Man Posted September 17, 2018 Posted September 17, 2018 Now that we have seen donbb's unfunny delay joke .......................here is some truth IT’S AS IF THIS IS REALLY JUST A PLOY TO DELAY THE VOTE UNTIL AFTER THE MIDTERMS: UPDATE: Democrats Have Made Sure That Brett Kavanaugh Will Never Get A Fair Hearing. It’s almost like that was the goal all along. 115Poste 2
IDBillzFan Posted September 17, 2018 Posted September 17, 2018 14 minutes ago, B-Man said: 115Poste It would seem to me Dr. Ford would be eager to get this going first thing tomorrow a.m. Why would she not cooperate? Why won't Feinstein cooperate? What are they hiding?
3rdnlng Posted September 17, 2018 Posted September 17, 2018 7 minutes ago, LABillzFan said: It would seem to me Dr. Ford would be eager to get this going first thing tomorrow a.m. Why would she not cooperate? Why won't Feinstein cooperate? What are they hiding? It's their drive-by MO. BTW, Tucker Carlson tonight is addressing why people are leaving CA.
Recommended Posts