DC Tom Posted October 25, 2018 Posted October 25, 2018 Just now, Foxx said: sorry Avenatti. it doesn't work that way. not to mention that the Kavanaugh thing, is, you know... over. your day in court is coming, be sure and yell, Squirrel all you want. Plus...he appears to think a criminal referral is yet another Senate Hearing. 2
Tiberius Posted October 26, 2018 Posted October 26, 2018 It would have been kind of funny, in hindsight, if Hillary had come out and claimed Kavanaugh had assaulted her while he was drunk at a DC party 1
Uncle Joe Posted October 26, 2018 Posted October 26, 2018 13 minutes ago, Tiberius said: It would have been kind of funny, in hindsight, if Hillary had come out and claimed Kavanaugh had assaulted her while he was drunk at a DC party 2
IDBillzFan Posted October 26, 2018 Posted October 26, 2018 Question: When you, as a news network, withhold critical information that shows someone is lying about rape allegations against a SCOTUS nominee, is that considered fake news? Or is there another name for that? Asking for a friend. 1
Deranged Rhino Posted October 26, 2018 Posted October 26, 2018 4 minutes ago, LABillzFan said: Question: When you, as a news network, withhold critical information that shows someone is lying about rape allegations against a SCOTUS nominee, is that considered fake news? Or is there another name for that? Asking for a friend. It's amazing how fast they're trying to bury Avenatti while trying to put distance between their network and the fake news they've been spreading on this issue.
DC Tom Posted October 26, 2018 Posted October 26, 2018 9 minutes ago, LABillzFan said: Question: When you, as a news network, withhold critical information that shows someone is lying about rape allegations against a SCOTUS nominee, is that considered fake news? Or is there another name for that? Asking for a friend. They were well within their rights. They weren't required to provide information to the Senate. It's not malfeasance on their part, it's editorialism. *****, biased editorialism. But still editorialism.
Doc Posted October 26, 2018 Posted October 26, 2018 This is no different than Leland Keyser destroying Ford's credibility by saying she never attended a party where both Ford and Kavanaugh were in attendance. It was never about the facts. 3
IDBillzFan Posted October 26, 2018 Posted October 26, 2018 6 minutes ago, DC Tom said: They were well within their rights. They weren't required to provide information to the Senate. It's not malfeasance on their part, it's editorialism. *****, biased editorialism. But still editorialism. I know. I just, y'know, this is the kind of stuff that I look at and think "Damn, a LOT of people got hurt unnecessarily over one portion that could have been totally avoided if only NBC has a shred of integrity." Heads should roll because of it.
DC Tom Posted October 26, 2018 Posted October 26, 2018 12 minutes ago, LABillzFan said: I know. I just, y'know, this is the kind of stuff that I look at and think "Damn, a LOT of people got hurt unnecessarily over one portion that could have been totally avoided if only NBC has a shred of integrity." Heads should roll because of it. From their point of view, a lot of people got hurt NECESSARILY because of what they did. When you're fighting Nazis, etc...
Foxx Posted October 26, 2018 Posted October 26, 2018 1 hour ago, LABillzFan said: I know. I just, y'know, this is the kind of stuff that I look at and think "Damn, a LOT of people got hurt unnecessarily over one portion that could have been totally avoided if only NBC has a shred of integrity." Heads should roll because of it. well, to be fair, they did just get rid of Megan Kelly. ?
Thurmal34 Posted October 27, 2018 Posted October 27, 2018 Didn't our nations press secretary release a statement saying that the Supreme Court under President Trump was now secured for decades? Under. One of these things is not like the other. Does this administration not understand who is in charge?
Foxx Posted October 27, 2018 Posted October 27, 2018 1 hour ago, Thurmal34 said: Didn't our nations press secretary release a statement saying that the Supreme Court under President Trump was now secured for decades? Under. One of these things is not like the other. Does this administration not understand who is in charge? com'on. it's all about context and reading comprehension. try reading what you posted again, "... the Supreme Court under President Trump was now ...". if you think she was saying that the Supreme Court was below the President or even that, Trump was above the SC, then you have no comprehension abilities. try reading it where she was referring to the fact that the SC, while under the President's tenure is now... you probably didn't get that though either....
3rdnlng Posted October 27, 2018 Posted October 27, 2018 14 minutes ago, Foxx said: com'on. it's all about context and reading comprehension. try reading what you posted again, "... the Supreme Court under President Trump was now ...". if you think she was saying that the Supreme Court was below the President or even that, Trump was above the SC, then you have no comprehension abilities. try reading it where she was referring to the fact that the SC, while under the President's tenure is now... you probably didn't get that though either.... He's drunk again and not worth your time.
4merper4mer Posted October 27, 2018 Posted October 27, 2018 20 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: It's amazing how fast they're trying to bury Avenatti while trying to put distance between their network and the fake news they've been spreading on this issue. Amazing? How about consistent with a well worn pattern? 1
Koko78 Posted October 27, 2018 Posted October 27, 2018 3 hours ago, Thurmal34 said: Didn't our nations press secretary release a statement saying that the Supreme Court under President Trump was now secured for decades? Under. One of these things is not like the other. Does this administration not understand who is in charge? Somebody's trying too hard.
Deranged Rhino Posted October 27, 2018 Posted October 27, 2018 https://mobile.twitter.com/johncardillo/status/1056239036187193345 1
B-Man Posted October 30, 2018 Posted October 30, 2018 Trump interviews Indian-American woman to replace Brett Kavanaugh on DC Circuit https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/trump-interviews-minority-woman-to-replace-brett-kavanaugh-on-dc-circuit
Koko78 Posted October 30, 2018 Posted October 30, 2018 19 minutes ago, B-Man said: Trump interviews Indian-American woman to replace Brett Kavanaugh on DC Circuit https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/trump-interviews-minority-woman-to-replace-brett-kavanaugh-on-dc-circuit Still more Native American than Elizabeth Warren. 2
Recommended Posts