reddogblitz Posted October 16, 2018 Posted October 16, 2018 46 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: "Asterisk". Nice try.
3rdnlng Posted October 16, 2018 Posted October 16, 2018 12 minutes ago, reddogblitz said: Nice try. Why would I try to cover for that idiot? The audio was cut off rather suspiciously. Asterisk makes sense in context. Ass does not.
reddogblitz Posted October 16, 2018 Posted October 16, 2018 Just now, 3rdnlng said: Why would I try to cover for that idiot? The audio was cut off rather suspiciously. Asterisk makes sense in context. Ass does not. I meant "nice try" to whoever posted it originally.
3rdnlng Posted October 16, 2018 Posted October 16, 2018 https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/oct/7/mazie-hirono-says-brett-kavanaugh-enters-supreme-c/ “He’s going to be on the Supreme Court with a huge taint and a big asterisk after his name,” said Ms. Hirono on ABC’s “This Week.” “The partisanship that he showed was astounding.” 3 minutes ago, reddogblitz said: I meant "nice try" to whoever posted it originally. It was that Russian Teddy KGB trying to upset our midterms. 1
reddogblitz Posted October 16, 2018 Posted October 16, 2018 (edited) 12 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/oct/7/mazie-hirono-says-brett-kavanaugh-enters-supreme-c/ “He’s going to be on the Supreme Court with a huge taint and a big asterisk after his name,” said Ms. Hirono on ABC’s “This Week.” “The partisanship that he showed was astounding.” It's stuff like this that keeps me from taking these people seriously. this is far from an isolated case. they think I'm stupid and will believe whatever they tell me. Edited October 16, 2018 by reddogblitz
DC Tom Posted October 16, 2018 Posted October 16, 2018 1 hour ago, reddogblitz said: It's stuff like this that keeps me from taking these people seriously. this is far from an isolated case. they think I'm stupid and will believe whatever they tell me. They don't think you're stupid. They think enough people are stupid to buy that story that they can win elections. And they're right. But they don't think that you're personally stupid. I can think you're stupid if you want, though.
4merper4mer Posted October 17, 2018 Posted October 17, 2018 4 hours ago, 3rdnlng said: https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/oct/7/mazie-hirono-says-brett-kavanaugh-enters-supreme-c/ “He’s going to be on the Supreme Court with a huge taint and a big asterisk after his name,” said Ms. Hirono on ABC’s “This Week.” “The partisanship that he showed was astounding.” Hirono has no business calling anyone a sexual predator if she is simultaneously mocking the size of their taint.
Doc Posted October 17, 2018 Posted October 17, 2018 Hirono defended Inouye from charges of sexual assault back in the early 90's. So chalk up another hypocrite.
IDBillzFan Posted October 18, 2018 Posted October 18, 2018 Cocaine Mitch on a mission. Interesting article.
Deranged Rhino Posted October 18, 2018 Posted October 18, 2018 3 hours ago, LABillzFan said: Cocaine Mitch on a mission. Interesting article. (it's almost like he knows there is going to be a busy docket soon)
Nanker Posted October 18, 2018 Author Posted October 18, 2018 3 hours ago, LABillzFan said: Cocaine Mitch on a mission. Interesting article. The comments are so over the top paranoid, and ill informed.
Buffalo_Gal Posted October 19, 2018 Posted October 19, 2018 Judicial Watch announced today that it filed a complaint to the Board of Professional Responsibility of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals of Debra S. Katz, Lisa J. Banks, and Michael R. Bromwich for violating the rules of professional responsibility in their representation of Dr. Christine Blasey Ford before the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee during the hearings on the nomination of the Honorable Brett Kavanaugh.Dr. Ford’s lawyers neglected to inform their client that she could have been interviewed by female staffers at home, in private rather than the formal hearing in Washington, DC According to the Judicial Watch complaint, by not informing their client Dr. Ford that Sen. Chuck Grassley, Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee offered in a letter to “fly female staff investigators to meet Dr. Ford… in California, or anywhere else, to obtain (her) testimony,” Katz, Banks, and Bromwich violated the following District of Columbia Rules of Professional Conduct: Rule l.4(a) – A lawyer shall keep a client reasonably informed about the status of a matter and promptly comply with reasonable requests for information. Rule 1.4(b) – A lawyer shall explain a matter to the extent reasonably necessary to permit the client to make informed decisions regarding the representation. Judicial Watch Files Bar Complaint Against Christine Blasey Ford’s Lawyers 1
Gary M Posted October 19, 2018 Posted October 19, 2018 Have they banned female reproductive rights abortion yet?
Koko78 Posted October 19, 2018 Posted October 19, 2018 2 hours ago, Gary M said: Have they banned female reproductive rights abortion yet? That's next week. This week the Court is focused on re-instituting slavery. November is take-away-grandma's-health-insurance month. The wholesale slaughter of women and blacks by the Court's executioners begins in the December term. 1
DC Tom Posted October 19, 2018 Posted October 19, 2018 1 minute ago, Koko78 said: That's next week. This week the Court is focused on re-instituting slavery. November is take-away-grandma's-health-insurance month. The wholesale slaughter of women and blacks by the Court's executioners begins in the December term. December is "Sterilize Gays" month. Slaughtering women isn't on the docket until March, after Kavanaugh rapes 'em all. 1
TakeYouToTasker Posted October 19, 2018 Posted October 19, 2018 5 minutes ago, DC Tom said: December is "Sterilize Gays" month. Slaughtering women isn't on the docket until March, after Kavanaugh rapes 'em all. Quickly, why would we need to sterilize gays? I could see genital mutilation and cauterization, but sterilization specifically doesn't make much sense.
Recommended Posts