boyst Posted October 6, 2018 Posted October 6, 2018 (edited) 2 minutes ago, /dev/null said: 50-48 https://goo.gl/images/F6eQ5Q Edited October 6, 2018 by Boyst62
Albwan Posted October 6, 2018 Posted October 6, 2018 (edited) PARTY DUDES ! Edited October 6, 2018 by Albwan
Cinga Posted October 6, 2018 Posted October 6, 2018 24 minutes ago, Boyst62 said: The gallery is brought in every 5 minutes to observe democracy in action as the guests of the congressional delegates. Watch Mr Smith goes to watching you ignorant swine. I've watched it a number of times, but I don't see the significance.... 2
Koko78 Posted October 6, 2018 Posted October 6, 2018 3 hours ago, LSHMEAB said: But that's not true. Bill Gates lives in a relatively populous state while the dude living under the overpass in Wyoming does not. So the dude living under the overpass in Cheyenne has MORE of a say than Bill Gates based on the electoral college. Not only that, the dude living under the overpass in Cheyenne is represented by the same number of senators as the overpass dwelling transient in Los Angeles despite the fact that 20 million people live in CA compared to 580k in Wyoming. The whole system has allowed Bridgy Bill in Cheyenne to choose our leaders; thus Trump. The fact that you continue to analyze the electoral college by individual votes shows that you really don't understand the US Constitution at all.
Doc Brown Posted October 6, 2018 Posted October 6, 2018 Prediction: If Democrats retake all three branches they will increase the number of Supreme Court Justices to give them a majority citing McConnell's refusal to hold a vote on Garland as the betrayal of 150 years of an unspoken agreement between the parties of the Supreme Court appointment process.
Cinga Posted October 6, 2018 Posted October 6, 2018 1 minute ago, Koko78 said: The fact that you continue to analyze the electoral college by individual votes shows that you really don't understand the US Constitution at all. Easy on him... As you know, kids are taught now that our nation is a democracy so the ignorance is only partially self inflicted.... 1
RaoulDuke79 Posted October 6, 2018 Posted October 6, 2018 Now we can sit back and watch people destroy.....ooops I mean protest their own communities.
Bray Wyatt Posted October 6, 2018 Posted October 6, 2018 2 minutes ago, Doc Brown said: Prediction: If Democrats retake all three branches they will increase the number of Supreme Court Justices to give them a majority citing McConnell's refusal to hold a vote on Garland as the betrayal of 150 years of an unspoken agreement between the parties of the Supreme Court appointment process. Except they can’t pack the court, FDR tried and it was ruled unconstitutional
Wacka Posted October 6, 2018 Posted October 6, 2018 (edited) C'mon Capitol police , bring out the tear gas, fire hoses and police dogs! Edited October 6, 2018 by Wacka
RaoulDuke79 Posted October 6, 2018 Posted October 6, 2018 1 minute ago, Wacka said: C'mon Capitol police , bring out the tear gas, fire hoses and police dogs! And batons.
boyst Posted October 6, 2018 Posted October 6, 2018 1 minute ago, Wacka said: C'mon Capitol police , bring out the tear gas, fire hoses and police dogs! Is it that bad? I turned it off
Taro T Posted October 6, 2018 Posted October 6, 2018 Who were the 2 that didn't vote? Assuming Manchin & Murkowski were a yea & nay respectively.
Bray Wyatt Posted October 6, 2018 Posted October 6, 2018 1 minute ago, Taro T said: Who were the 2 that didn't vote? Assuming Manchin & Murkowski were a yea & nay respectively. The montana guy didn’t show up and murkowski didn’t vote I believe 1
/dev/null Posted October 6, 2018 Posted October 6, 2018 1 minute ago, Taro T said: Who were the 2 that didn't vote? Assuming Manchin & Murkowski were a yea & nay respectively. Montana Senator at his daughter's funeral was one non-vote Murkowski voted an Obamaesque "present" 10 minutes ago, Doc Brown said: Prediction: If Democrats retake all three branches they will increase the number of Supreme Court Justices to give them a majority citing McConnell's refusal to hold a vote on Garland as the betrayal of 150 years of an unspoken agreement between the parties of the Supreme Court appointment process. And when the pendulum swings back again the Republicans follow suit When does it stop? 1
Koko78 Posted October 6, 2018 Posted October 6, 2018 6 minutes ago, Bray Wyatt said: Except they can’t pack the court, FDR tried and it was ruled unconstitutional It wasn't. The Democrats started to revolt against FDR, so he dropped it. The Constitution does not specify the number or makeup of federal courts (including the Supreme Court.) It's up to Congress to legislate how many district courts, circuit courts and supreme court justices there are.
RaoulDuke79 Posted October 6, 2018 Posted October 6, 2018 I'm floored by the number of extremely homely "victims" out there protesting. 1
Cinga Posted October 6, 2018 Posted October 6, 2018 2 minutes ago, /dev/null said: Montana Senator at his daughter's funeral wedding was one non-vote Murkowski voted an Obamaesque "present" FIFY
boyst Posted October 6, 2018 Posted October 6, 2018 3 minutes ago, /dev/null said: Montana Senator at his daughter's funeral was one non-vote Murkowski voted an Obamaesque "present" And when the pendulum swings back again the Republicans follow suit When does it stop? I'd consider a wedding to be the end of one person's life therefore a funeral. 1
Recommended Posts