LB3 Posted October 6, 2018 Posted October 6, 2018 11 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said: LESS controversial!? The guy is vanilla GOPe. There isn't a LESS controversial judge to be had. Any "controversy" you may feel is attached was ginned up by the Democrats. Period. What do you mean!?! He coaches his kids and likes beer and baseball! He's literally Super-Hitler!
KRC Posted October 6, 2018 Posted October 6, 2018 9 minutes ago, LBSeeBallLBGetBall said: What do you mean!?! He coaches his kids and likes beer and baseball! He's literally Super-Hitler! He also throws ice. Don't forget about the ice. #IceLivesMatter 1
LB3 Posted October 6, 2018 Posted October 6, 2018 Just now, KRC said: He also throws ice. Don't forget about the ice. #IceLivesMatter I had repressed the nightmare that was the ice throwing. 1
ALF Posted October 6, 2018 Posted October 6, 2018 22 minutes ago, LABillzFan said: You didn't answer the question. If the right holds the Senate in November, was the scorched-earth last-minute destruction of Kavanaugh worth it, or would you look back and suggest a better approach? To counter your next question, let me say what I've said quite a bit: I don't care much at all for Trump, but I'll take him if all he does is seat Gorsuch and Kavanaugh. Even if the GOP loses the Senate next month. If the right holds the Senate in Nov , then the left made a big mistake going after Kavanaugh. I want to know who revealed the Ford letter that her rep and senator received that Ford did not want made public if I followed that correctly.
MichFan Posted October 6, 2018 Posted October 6, 2018 Kavanaugh’s confirmation was largely accomplished through Lindsey Graham and Susan Collins. Who would have thought these two would champion anything that came from Trump. Makes me believe that Kavanaugh is no where near the extremist that the Democrats have made him out to be. Collins’ speech yesterday was the most effective explanation of the reasoning behind a vote I have ever witnessed. Extremely impressive. 1
IDBillzFan Posted October 6, 2018 Posted October 6, 2018 Just now, ALF said: If the right holds the Senate in Nov , then the left made a big mistake going after Kavanaugh. I want to know who revealed the Ford letter that her rep and senator received that Ford did not want made public if I followed that correctly. One day you are likely to learn the entire thing was orchestrated...starting with the truth that virtually all of Ford's online presence was scrubbed, which doesn't just happen for someone in her position. Meawhile the left needs to stop giving the right mid-term advertisements.
Deranged Rhino Posted October 6, 2018 Posted October 6, 2018 48 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said: Warning shot by Graham to John Kerry and his buds? The whole lot of conspirators. 13 minutes ago, ALF said: If the right holds the Senate in Nov , then the left made a big mistake going after Kavanaugh. I want to know who revealed the Ford letter that her rep and senator received that Ford did not want made public if I followed that correctly. The Senate is not in play anymore for the dems. The GOP will hold the Senate and now, likely, the House. Who leaked the letter? It was staffers on the committee who leaked it. Whether they came from DF's staff or Harris's staff, or both is really irrelevant. It was a political move by those on the left to expose Dr. Ford to the public (against her will) and throw her to the wolves of public opinion - not because they cared about Dr. Ford or the issue (or even believed it), but because they knew in the MeToo era the accusation alone would grind things to a halt and allow them to pressure Trump to drop Kavanaugh. They badly misjudged the situation. ***************** From a woman pushing sharia law.
Deranged Rhino Posted October 6, 2018 Posted October 6, 2018 ************************ More on the Doxxer ******************** 3
keepthefaith Posted October 6, 2018 Posted October 6, 2018 (edited) 13 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: The whole lot of conspirators. The Senate is not in play anymore for the dems. The GOP will hold the Senate and now, likely, the House. Who leaked the letter? It was staffers on the committee who leaked it. Whether they came from DF's staff or Harris's staff, or both is really irrelevant. It was a political move by those on the left to expose Dr. Ford to the public (against her will) and throw her to the wolves of public opinion - not because they cared about Dr. Ford or the issue (or even believed it), but because they knew in the MeToo era the accusation alone would grind things to a halt and allow them to pressure Trump to drop Kavanaugh. They badly misjudged the situation. I don't believe at all that Ford ever intended to keep this confidential. To me it seems that Feinstein referred her to Katz and the quiet period was used to refine the story, scrub her SM profiles, and prepare Ford to go public all while Feinstein and co waited for the confirmation hearings pass so that they could drop this last minute. The claim of Ford wanting to remain anonymous was simply the excuse for the delay and for planning the coming out party. Or I think it's possible Katz brought Ford to Feinstein. Edited October 6, 2018 by keepthefaith 2
Doc Posted October 6, 2018 Posted October 6, 2018 4 minutes ago, keepthefaith said: I don't believe at all that Ford ever intended to keep this confidential. To me it seems that Feinstein referred her to Katz and the quiet period was used to refine the story, scrub her SM profiles, and prepare Ford to go public all while Feinstein and co waited for the confirmation hearings pass so that they could drop this last minute. The claim of Ford wanting to remain anonymous was simply the excuse for the delay and for planning the coming out party. Or I think it's possible Katz brought Ford to Feinstein. I agree. Why would Ford go to the trouble of all this just to keep it confidential? She wanted the information to be known so she could stop his nomination. What I think happened is that they investigated it on their own and found nothing to it. But in this era of #metoo, they figured they could spring it last second and it would gum up the works. 3
Deranged Rhino Posted October 6, 2018 Posted October 6, 2018 6 minutes ago, keepthefaith said: I don't believe at all that Ford ever intended to keep this confidential. To me it seems that Feinstein referred her to Katz and the quiet period was used to refine the story, scrub her SM profiles, and prepare Ford to go public all while Feinstein and co waited for the confirmation hearings pass so that they could drop this last minute. The claim of Ford wanting to remain anonymous was simply the excuse for the delay and for planning the coming out party. Or I think it's possible Katz brought Ford to Feinstein. Just now, Doc said: I agree. Why would Ford go to the trouble of all this just to keep it confidential? She wanted the information to be known so she could stop his nomination. What I think happened is that they investigated it on their own and found nothing to it. But in this era of #metoo, they figured they could spring it last second and it would gum up the works. Possible/likely (my thoughts on Ford go darker). *************************** **********************
DC Tom Posted October 6, 2018 Posted October 6, 2018 14 minutes ago, Doc said: I agree. Why would Ford go to the trouble of all this just to keep it confidential? She wanted the information to be known so she could stop his nomination. What I think happened is that they investigated it on their own and found nothing to it. But in this era of #metoo, they figured they could spring it last second and it would gum up the works. I'm not even sure they would have investigated it on their own. Just a "Hey, we can use this! Let's time it properly..." Really, in the past couple weeks, have the Democrats shown any real evidence they care about victims' rights? All I've seen is Democrats using them to generate outrage.
Foxx Posted October 6, 2018 Posted October 6, 2018 1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said: 1 hour ago, Buffalo_Gal said: Warning shot by Graham to John Kerry and his buds? who would the enemies be and what armed conflict would they be referring to Kerry here with?
billsfan1959 Posted October 6, 2018 Posted October 6, 2018 Just now, DC Tom said: I'm not even sure they would have investigated it on their own. Just a "Hey, we can use this! Let's time it properly..." Really, in the past couple weeks, have the Democrats shown any real evidence they care about victims' rights? All I've seen is Democrats using them to generate outrage. The democrats are experts at exploiting real victims for political gain, as well as creating a perception of victimization and then exploiting that perception for personal gain.
Nanker Posted October 6, 2018 Author Posted October 6, 2018 22 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Caption this: If you're happy and you know it, clap your hands. If you're happy and you know it, clap your hands. If you're happy and you know it , then your face will surely show it. If you're happy and you know it, clap your hands. 1 minute ago, Foxx said: who would the enemies be and what armed conflict would they be referring to Kerry here with? The Ayatollah Kakamamie in Iranistan. 1
Deranged Rhino Posted October 6, 2018 Posted October 6, 2018 Just now, Foxx said: who would the enemies be and what armed conflict would they be referring to Kerry here with? It's better asked/answered in the deep state thread. Kerry was openly working to undermine Trump's policy with Iran just a few weeks ago... but the answer is much deeper/darker. 1
Recommended Posts