President Donald J. Trump's Supreme Court Associate Justice Kavanaugh

[LB3]

2 minutes ago, Magox said:

What's funny about this utterly retarded statement is that it's right out of the Democratic playbook.

 

This is the best they have which is why the Republicans control more governorships,  Republican state congresses, conservative supreme court, Republican Congress, Republican U.S Senate and the presidency.

 

Maybe if you guys stepped away from this stupidity for a few you'd win a few more elections.

It was sarcasm. It's scary that we can post the most asinine things and it be totally believable that liberals would legitimately think that way.

Edited October 6, 2018 by LBSeeBallLBGetBall

[/dev/null]

8 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

 

Believe in something, even if it means sacrificing everything

[RochesterRob]

9 hours ago, DC Tom said:

 

Because it's a sane anti-democratic concoction, and not the least bit archaic.  To remove it would be to allow the urban coastal population to dominate the rural population.  That would be truly disastrous.  

 

The Constitution designs a system of government that specifically curbs authority.  That includes the authority of the people, and there is good reason for that: the Founding Fathers had a sound classical education, and thoroughly understood the problems with pure participative democracy, as it was practiced in classical Athens and led to chaos and the ultimate downfall of that city.  Don't take my word for it, read Thucydides.

 

The EC isn't the problem.  The people who don't understand that their Congressman represents them and not the President are the problem, as they scream for imperial executive powers and forget that curbs on powers - which they don't vote for, as they don't vote for representation - exist for a very good reason.

 

Won't happen.  If they vote to confirm they will be put up against the wall and shot.  

 

And I mean that literally.  That vote will cause violence.

  The liberals only see things through the lense of a socialist or communist state where the head of government controls the government.  Any parliamentary body is just for show and is impotent in terms of creating or installing policy.

[GG]

2 hours ago, ALF said:

If Kavanaugh becomes the cause of flipping the Senate next month , would he still be worth gridlock with E.O. rest of way  ?

 

The outcome may be the exact opposite due to the Kavanaugh process

[RochesterRob]

2 minutes ago, GG said:

 

The outcome may be the exact opposite due to the Kavanaugh process

  Yep, there is reason to believe that the Republican voter is now energized after the attempted smear of Kavanaugh.

Edited October 6, 2018 by RochesterRob

[ALF]

The midterms will be very interesting to follow whichever way it goes.

[Foxx]

10 hours ago, LSHMEAB said:

How about we just get rid of the archaic nonsensical EC that got Trump elected in the first place.

 

It's a ridiculous, anti-democratic concoction designed to throw people who chose to live in sh*tty states a bone. They've given them the whole damn steak.

 

One person. One vote. I'm sorry they chose to live in Alatucky. Tough luck buttercup.

not only are you an idiot but your a !@#$ing idiot.

 

those people who choose to live in ****ty states as you so delicately state, are the one who grow and raise the food to feed your stupid ass. how 'bout along with abolishing the EC, we just abolish any notion that they have any obligation to the feed the uppity !@#$s who live in the state of affluenza?

 

dickhead

Edited October 6, 2018 by Foxx

[MILFHUNTER#518]

11 hours ago, LABillzFan said:

Post of the day!?

[bbb]

2 hours ago, LBSeeBallLBGetBall said:

It was sarcasm. It's scary that we can post the most asinine things and it be totally believable that liberals would legitimately think that way.

 

Are you saying that it was double reverse sarcasm?  I think he gets that it was sarcasm to begin with.

[MILFHUNTER#518]

10 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:

I still cannot stand her

[ALF]

11 hours ago, LABillzFan said:

 

The day after losing West Virginia's Republican Senate primary, ex-convict and coal baron Don Blankenship took one more shot at Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell.

 

During the campaign, Blankenship had called McConnell "Cocaine Mitch" in a bizarre attack that seemed to reference drugs being found in 2014 aboard a ship that was owned by the father of McConnell's wife, Transportation Secretary Elaine Chao.

 

https://www.cnn.com/2018/05/09/politics/don-blankenship-last-jab-at-mcconnell/index.html

 

The midterms and 2020 will be something else 

 

 

[LB3]

4 minutes ago, bbb said:

 

Are you saying that it was double reverse sarcasm?  I think he gets that it was sarcasm to begin with.

Maybe sarcasm wasn't the right word. My post was mocking what liberals think conservatives are like. 

[boyst]

37 minutes ago, LBSeeBallLBGetBall said:

Maybe sarcasm wasn't the right word. My post was mocking what liberals think conservatives are like. 

Dafuq?  Are you thinking liberals have the ability to think?

 

Not unless they're told by their overlord Federalists.

Edited October 6, 2018 by Boyst62

[Buffalo_Gal]

26 minutes ago, ALF said:

 

The day after losing West Virginia's Republican Senate primary, ex-convict and coal baron Don Blankenship took one more shot at Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell.

 

During the campaign, Blankenship had called McConnell "Cocaine Mitch" in a bizarre attack that seemed to reference drugs being found in 2014 aboard a ship that was owned by the father of McConnell's wife, Transportation Secretary Elaine Chao.

 

https://www.cnn.com/2018/05/09/politics/don-blankenship-last-jab-at-mcconnell/index.html

 

The midterms and 2020 will be something else 

 

 

One of the best tweets ever:
 

 

[3rdnlng]

1 minute ago, Boyst62 said:

Dafuq?  Are you thinking liberals have the ability to think?

 

Not unless they're told by their overload Federalists.

Their ability to think is overshadowed by their ability to feel.

[Doc]

5 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said:

One of the best tweets ever:
 

 

 

I missed this when it happened.  Interesting that he took ownership of it like that.

[billsfan1959]

3 hours ago, ALF said:

If Kavanaugh becomes the cause of flipping the Senate next month , would he still be worth gridlock with E.O. rest of way  ?

Yes, IMO, for a number of reasons, to include:

(1) When you have the opportunity to fill a position on the Supreme Court, you do it

(2) This may have been an all time low in regard to behavior by Democrats on the confirmation committee. It was important to not legitimize that behavior.

(3) The fundamental principles of due process and the presumption of innocence are always worth fighting for

(4) The need to fight against the hijacking of legitimate sexual assault issues by radical ideologs. 

[Dr. Who]

3 minutes ago, billsfan1959 said:

Yes, IMO, for a number of reasons, to include:

(1) When you have the opportunity to fill a position on the Supreme Court, you do it

(2) This may have been an all time low in regard to behavior by Democrats on the confirmation committee. It was important to not legitimize that behavior.

(3) The fundamental principles of due process and the presumption of innocence are always worth fighting for

(4) The need to fight against the hijacking of legitimate sexual assault issues by radical ideologs. 

(5) The premise is likely wrong. Kavanaugh has made it crystal clear to traditionalists just how cruel and devious the Left is. If anything, there is greater incentive and passion to keep the Senate GOP.

[Buffalo_Gal]

This gives new meaning to the term ❄️
 

Mark Zuckerberg held a meeting to try and calm Facebook employee outrage after an exec attended the Kavanaugh hearing (FB)
 

Facebook has been battling an employee revolt after a senior exec, Joel Kaplan, attended the Brett Kavanaugh Senate hearing in support of the US Supreme Court nominee.
On Friday, the company held an internal "town hall" meeting with employees to discuss the issue, with CEO Mark Zuckerberg in attendance. 
Zuckerberg reportedly talked about the importance of supporting diverse viewpoints at Facebook.
Facebook has held a company "town hall" meeting with employees to try and quell outrage after a senior executive attended the recent Senate hearing of US Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh. CEO Mark Zuckerberg and COO Sheryl Sandberg were both in attendance. 

[RochesterRob]

4 minutes ago, billsfan1959 said:

Yes, IMO, for a number of reasons, to include:

(1) When you have the opportunity to fill a position on the Supreme Court, you do it

(2) This may have been an all time low in regard to behavior by Democrats on the confirmation committee. It was important to not legitimize that behavior.

(3) The fundamental principles of due process and the presumption of innocence are always worth fighting for

(4) The need to fight against the hijacking of legitimate sexual assault issues by radical ideologs. 

  Even if the Senate flips in 2018 there is a good chance of flipping back over the next several years.  SC justices are for a much longer haul.  I still think that the underhanded measures taken during the nomination process have as much chance to motivate Republicans as having Kavanaugh on the bench energizing Democrats.